Skip to content

U.S. Embassy in Moscow Defiantly Celebrated LGBT “Pride” Month in Russia

U.S. Embassy in Moscow Defiantly Celebrated LGBT “Pride” Month in Russia
By Julio Severo

To mark LGBT “Pride” Month, the US Embassy in Russia defiantly and prominently displayed the flag of the homosexual movement outside its building on June 2020 and posted a message written in Russian on its Instagram saying: “Today, the US Embassy in Russia honors the LGBTI Pride Flag during the #PrideFlagDay celebration.”

It was a provocative maneuver for two reasons. In 2013 Russia passed a law banning homosexual propaganda to children and teens.

Secondly, Russia is advancing constitutional amendments, introduced by President Vladimir Putin, defining marriage as being between one man and one woman only.

John Sullivan, U.S. Ambassador to Russia, said,

“This year, I’m honored to lead the team at the US Embassy in Moscow, in commemorating the history of the fight for LGBTI rights in the United States, and looking forward to a better future for LGBTI persons across the globe. LGBTI rights are human rights, and human rights are universal. It’s as simple as that. Pride Month recognizes that every individual deserves to live a life free from hate, prejudice and harassment.”

Even though some naïve Christians — including Tony Perkins, from the Family Research Council — have believed that the effort of the Trump administration to make homosexuality legal around the world is only to protect homosexuals, the move of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow shows clearly that such protection is just a strategy to promote the full gay agenda.

The Trump administration, as the Obama administration had done, has targeted Russia not because Russia kills homosexuals, but because Russia protects homosexuals from killings and, at the same time, protects children from homosexual propaganda and indoctrination and protects marriage from homosexual attacks.

In my article about the U.S. Embassy in Brazil celebrating LGBTI “Pride” Day, I had also explained that the language about protection of homosexuals is just a façade. Nothing else. Left-wingers have always used such façade. It just does not make sense that right-wingers are now imitating left-wingers.

To prove further my point, I visited the website of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow on June 30. Sure enough, there was an official message there saying:

“Today, the U.S. Embassy in Russia displays the LGBTI Pride Flag. The LGBTI flag was created by American artist and activist Gilbert Baker and was first raised as a symbol of hope and diversity on June 25, 1978, during the Gay Freedom Day parade in San Francisco. June is Pride Month and we celebrate that everyone deserves to live a life free from hatred, prejudice, and persecution. As Ambassador Sullivan has said, ‘LGBTI rights are human rights. And human rights are universal. It’s as simple as that.’”

The U.S. Embassy in Moscow also included this statement, “This June, we celebrate Pride Month by applauding LGBTI activists and their allies.” The U.S. embassy is applauding homosexual activists who often work to indoctrinate children.

So the Trump administration has such offensive messages in Russia, which does not kill homosexuals.

Next, I visited the website of the U.S. Embassy in Riyadh, capital of Saudi Arabia, in the same day, June 30. Sure enough, there was no message from the Trump administration about celebrating June as homosexual “pride” month. The respect the U.S. has for Saudi Arabia and its Islamic laws surpasses any respect the U.S. has for the gay agenda.

Saudi Arabia, a close U.S. ally, kills homosexuals.

So if the U.S. effort is about protecting homosexuals, why does the Trump administration target Russia, not Saudi Arabia?

The fact that the Trump administration is defiantly provoking Russia, which does not kill homosexuals, by displaying a homosexual flag in its embassy in Moscow while its embassy, which displays no homosexual flag in its building, in Saudi Arabia remains silent over Saudi killings of homosexuals is enough evidence that the U.S. government in its promotion of the gay agenda will not forgive Russia for protecting children from homosexual propaganda and indoctrination, but it will give special allowances to Saudi Arabia that kills homosexuals, as it has already given.

The Obama administration, which was left-wing, launched several actions against Russia because of the Russian law protecting children against homosexual propaganda and indoctrination.

The Trump administration, which does not consider itself left-wing, was supposed to praise and support the excellent Russian law, which was praised by Franklin Graham, who condemned Obama’s homosexualist policies.

Some could wonder why U.S. conservative Christian leaders are silent about such policies in the Trump administration. The answer is simple: Trump’s White House is open to hear some parts of the Bible, but no biblical condemnation of sex of men with men. Christian leaders who attacked Obama’s homosexualist policies were not invited by the Obama administration for anything.

Similarly, Christian leaders who want to attack Trump’s homosexualist policies will not be invited by the Trump administration for anything.

Just as the Obama administration did, the Trump administration and its embassies are making sodomy great around the world defying above all God, who makes no exception to this sin which he calls “abomination” in His Word, which says:

“You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.” (Leviticus 18:22 NKJV)

The Deep State, dominated by neocons, is homosexualist. So it does not matter anymore if the U.S. government is under a Democratic (left-wing) or Republican (right-wing) president, they will do the will of the Deep State, as far as the homosexual agenda and endless wars are concerned.

State Secretary Mike Pompeo, who controls U.S. embassies and has celebrated June as gay “pride” month, is considered a “devout” evangelical. In the Obama administration, conservatives would call him devout liberal and left-winger. But today, conservatives just go silent while the Trump administration and its embassies continue doing exactly what the Obama administration was doing: promoting the gay agenda.

Under Richard Grenell, the Trump administration launched a global campaign to decriminalize homosexuality around the world. Grenell, who is a Republican homosexualist married to another homosexual, made it clear that condemnation of violence is just one of the steps the U.S. government is taking to normalize homosexuality around the world and that there are more 21 steps. So there is a much bigger plan and strategy.

This article stems from my conviction, as a devout evangelical Christian, in the Bible that homosexuality should never be granted any status of normalcy. If governments and their officials can talk about violence against homosexuals as an excuse to advance normalcy of homosexuality and other items of the gay agenda, why not to talk also about violence by homosexuals, including the psychological violence of homosexual propaganda and indoctrination to children and physical violence against boys who are victims of predatory homosexual rapists?

This is not the first time I have called the attention for the homosexualist policies of the Trump administration. My public stance has been mentioned by the largest U.S. homosexual magazine.

Planned Parenthood, the largest network of abortion facilities in the U.S., recognized decades ago that homosexuality is one of the most effective forms of population control.

The most drastic policy of population reduction ever promoted by the U.S. government was not made by a socialist Democratic administration, but by a “conservative” Republican administration in the 1970s. Its name is NSSM 200, which specifically mentions Brazil and other nations as special targets for population control measures through birth control or “family planning” to advance U.S. interests.

I do not know if the Trump administration and its embassies are continuing Obama’s homosexualist policies or the traditional population control policies of Republicans. I only know that such policies are detrimental for children.

Original Article

Back To Top