Skip to content

Why is an Afghan Muslim Rapist Given Police Protection in Germany?

Why is an Afghan Muslim Rapist Given Police Protection in Germany?
What’s wrong with this picture? Everything.
By Hugh Fitzgerald

Two and a half years ago, Mukhtar N., a 29-year-old Afghan, took part in the gang-rape of a 14-year-old German girl by four Muslim migrants who had been allowed into Germany. Apparently free housing, medical care, and education (to the extent that these economic migrants would want it), food allowances, and more, were not enough; they also felt entitled to make free with Infidel girls who, by their dress and manner, are in their Muslim view “just asking for it.” Now that Afghan rapist is out on the streets. He served two and a half years in prison. Why was he given such a light sentence? Was it because, as an Afghan, he didn’t understand German mores, and couldn’t be expected to follow rules that were so foreign to his way of thinking? He was supposed to be deported after finishing his sentence. But that hasn’t happened. No police have arrived to take him to the airport. Nor has he been punished for ignoring one of the conditions of his freedom: that he check in daily at the Town Hall, so the authorities can keep track of his whereabouts. And because the local government fears that he might be harmed by someone – say, the father or brother of the 14-year-old girl who was raped by four Muslim men over many hours – it has provided him with round-the-clock police protection. What’s wrong with this picture? Everything. The story is here: “Outrage after Afghan gang rapist given police protection in Germany; interior ministry refuses to deport him,” by John Cody, ReMix News, December 16, 2022:

After just two and a half years in prison for gang rape, Afghan Mukthar N. is back out on the streets of Illerkirchberg, but this time he enjoys taxpayer-funded police protection. The fact that he is in Illerkirchberg is also notable, given it is on the outskirts of Ulm, a city that made national headlines recently after an Eritrean migrant murdered the 14-year-old girl Ece S.

Authorities say they are “concerned” for the gang rapist’s safety due to growing resentment in Illerkirchberg, which has a troubled asylum home where gang rapists and murderers have menaced the small community.

Just think of that. There is an asylum home where gang rapists and murderers apparently live, or are prepared for a life of such crime, and from where they emerge to “menace the small community.” Why aren’t they being picked up right now by the police? Or better yet, why hasn’t this “asylum home” simply been shut down for good?

The police protection detail reportedly began on the same day of the funeral for Ece S.

The 29-year-old Mukthar N. was already supposed to have been deported, but due to intervention from left-wing Interior Minister Nancy Faeser (SPD), the man has been allowed to stay in Germany. The district continues to try to deport the sex offender, who drugged and raped a girl, also 14 years old at the time, with three other asylum seekers. The ordeal lasted for hours for the young girl.

However, Faeser’s interior ministry argues that such a deportation is not possible due to Taliban rule in Afghanistan.

But why would the Taliban be any threat to Mukthar N.? He sounds like a perfectly good Muslim. The Taliban wouldn’t mind that he had been involved in the drugging and gang-rape of a 14-year-old kuffar girl. Far from it – they’d be proud of him for showing the Infidels in Germany what real Muslim men are made of. And besides, such girls are only asking for it. No, he’d fit right in in today’s Afghanistan. Interior Minister Nancy Faeser needn’t worry about his safety.

After Mukthar N.’s prison sentence, the state government sent him back to the scene of the crime, Illerkirchberg, where he now has taxpayer-funded police protection. However, the community was never informed the convicted gang rapist was sent back into their area, despite police saying the man continues to represent “high potential danger of committing further sexual offenses to the detriment of unknown young women.”

Why not? Did the police not want to set too many people against Mukhtar N. without giving him a chance to prove what a swell fellow he really is, once you get to know him? What conceivable reason did the police have in not letting everyone know about this extreme sex offender, this once-and-likely-future rapist?

Mukthar N. is supposed to report daily to the town hall of the village as a part of his release conditions, but the rejected asylum seeker has fundamentally violated this requirement. Despite this violation, he has faced no consequences.

That was his only requirement – check in daily at the Town Hall. A most modest task for someone who managed to be sentenced to only 2½ years in prison, despite being convicted of the gang-rape of a minor. But even that was apparently too much for Mukhtar N. to comply with. There have been no consequences for his violation of this requirement. Why?

After the murder of Ece S [another German 14-year-old, murdered by another Muslim migrant], who was stabbed to death on her way to school by a migrant from the local asylum home, police fear there will be retribution against asylum seekers in Illerkirchberg. As a result, once news leaked that Mukthar N. was back in Illerkirchberg, police began guarding his home.

His home? He has a home? Why isn’t he back in the asylum with his fellow migrants, enduring collective living with people just like himself?

According to Bild newspaper, the Ulm police headquarters announced, “We also have to worry about his safety. If there is a recommendation we can give him, then of course we will give it to him.”…

Why was Mukhthar N. ever allowed into Germany in the first place?

Why was Mukhtar N. allowed to live on the dole, happily unemployed, for so many years?

Why was Mukhtar N. sentenced to only 2½ years in prison for the gang-rape of a minor?

Why was Mukhtar N. not deported to Afghanistan once he had served his time, as his original sentence required?

Why was the Interior Minister Nancy Faeser not severely reprimanded for her decision to keep Mukhtar N. from being deported, on the absurd grounds that he would not be safe in Taliban-dominated Afghanistan?

Why was Mukhtar N. not sent back to prison for violating the sole condition of his release, which was to check in at the local Town Hall every day?

Why are the German taxpayers paying for police protection for a convicted rapist?

Why? Pourquoi? Warum?

Our minds are not subtle enough to understand. So please help us out. Please explain.

Original Article

Back To Top