pixelpusher
Well-Known Member
A bunch of idjits? Likely under Romans 1 effect.
World Health Organization Upcoming Vote in May Threatens Nations' Sovereignty
- Thread starter Andiamo
- Start date
GHoe
Well-Known Member
I've seen some news that Australia will embrace a pandemic treaty. I've also seen news that Brazilian president has come out saying he will not sign it. Hoping that holds true.
The American contingent will include 25 politicians and Biden Administration officials. U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo will join Climate Czar John Kerry as the White House representatives there. They will be joined by 12 democrat and 10 republican politicians, including 7 senators and two state governors. There is a pdf of the full list of attendees on the site.
Dossier.substack.com is reporting
The American contingent will include 25 politicians and Biden Administration officials. U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo will join Climate Czar John Kerry as the White House representatives there. They will be joined by 12 democrat and 10 republican politicians, including 7 senators and two state governors. There is a pdf of the full list of attendees on the site.
lightofmylife
Blessed Hope-Prepare To Fly!
Thanks for the info. Don't you just love that climate czar ridiculous remark. They try to make it sound so important. Just a bunch of jibberish.
ing it backfires! 
madcat
Well-Known Member
So THAT’S where the pox came from !!!!!!
madcat
Well-Known Member
So far only Israel is refusing to sign. Sanhedrin has voted against it for religious reasons. But as I under it, it’s a majority vote that will pass it. Not sure how Israel will be able to be independent and not be sanctioned by the World Homicide Organization. The parameters O’BIDEN (Gates, et.al.) submitted to the WHO really does take away ALL nation’s sovereignty without a reason - just a whim. If Tedros says there is an epidemic of ingrown toenails, he can lock down ANY nation (and force all to wear snow boots in your house).
UN forces can come in and force all citizens to comply with whatever mandates they make. RIP America.
It was fun while it lasted——-Only Jesus can stop this, because the world’s demonic leaders have their plans cemented at this point.
NewWine2020
Well-Known Member
I filmed an "instructional video" on how to wash a cat (my tortoiseshell Cat, Mocha) for school back in the day...it ended up being rated PG-13 for "some blood, some language."
Instead of "funny outtakes" at the end was an unplanned for but very useful segment on "how to sterilize and treat punctures and/or lacerations."
Yeah, she just cleans herself by herself now.
madcat
Well-Known Member
Not to mention being reported to the police for torture due to the sounds of blood-curdling screams/howls coming from your bathroom!!!!!I filmed an "instructional video" on how to wash a cat (my tortoiseshell Cat, Mocha) for school back in the day...it ended up being rated PG-13 for "some blood, some language."
Instead of "funny outtakes" at the end was an unplanned for but very useful segment on "how to sterilize and treat punctures and/or lacerations."
Yeah, she just cleans herself by herself now.
Been there, done that !!!!! The most I ever did after trying the tub, was wipe off a necessary “body part“ with a wet washcloth!!!!!!
Telos
New Member
I just read the Thinking Conservative article from the OP, including the proposed amendments. I'm not the smartest guy in the world, and I am not familiar with the organizational documents of the WHO, so some clarification would help me out greatly. Could someone explain exactly how the amendments would undermine national sovereignty (specifically the items in Article 12, sections 2, 3, and 5 that are struck-through, as the article states)? Additionally, where is authority granted to the WHO to enact and enforce mandates within a nation's territory?
Kerbluey
Well-Known Member
Wouldn’t it require full Senate approval? Which he (Biden) won’t get.
Our leaders don't seem to let something silly like constitutional law get in the way of their dreams.
JimFromOhio
Well-Known Member
From what I read, they don’t need Senate approval. Since the treaty itself was already approved and these are just amendments, no approval is needed.
ByFaithIFly
Member
I heard that if a country does NOT follow their mandate, that country can and will use their own military to push back any UN troops sent in to enforce it. That could get very out of control especially if more than one country say's NO. I also heard that if it passes, it would not become effective till Sept/Oct. Hopefully we will all be gone by then Lord willing...So far only Israel is refusing to sign. Sanhedrin has voted against it for religious reasons. But as I under it, it’s a majority vote that will pass it. Not sure how Israel will be able to be independent and not be sanctioned by the World Homicide Organization. The parameters O’BIDEN (Gates, et.al.) submitted to the WHO really does take away ALL nation’s sovereignty without a reason - just a whim. If Tedros says there is an epidemic of ingrown toenails, he can lock down ANY nation (and force all to wear snow boots in your house).
UN forces can come in and force all citizens to comply with whatever mandates they make. RIP America.
Only Jesus can stop this, because the world’s demonic leaders have their plans cemented at this point.
Jan51
Well-Known Member
I read that 12 of the 13 amendments were dropped.
What does that mean? I find this so hard to follow.
lightofmylife
Blessed Hope-Prepare To Fly!
I am thinking the same what does this mean please explain?
Telos
New Member
Thirteen articles of the International Health Regulation are affected by the proposed amendments. The rumor probably states that the amendments in twelve of those articles have been thrown out. That is my best guess. I have not seen any news about it.
Jan51
Well-Known Member
The first article is about the amendments, the second is about the 12 dropped.
Biden Seeks Powers for WHO Chief to Declare Public Health Emergencies
Byterrazetzz
Friday, 20 May 2022, 21:32 PM
The logo of the World Health Organization is seen at the WHO headquarters in Geneva, on June 11, 2009. (Anja Niedringhaus/AP Photo)
Source: Zero Hedge | By TYLER DURDEN
FRIDAY, MAY 20, 2022 – 05:00 AM
Biden Seeks New Unilateral Powers For WHO Chief To Declare Public Health Emergencies
Authored by Mark Tapscott via The Epoch Times,
President Joe Biden’s administration is pushing amendments to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) governing regulations to give Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus unilateral authority to declare a public health emergency in any nation based on whatever evidence he chooses.
The proposed U.S. amendments were forwarded to the WHO in January for consideration next week by the UN’s 75th World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland.
In a Jan. 26 letter to a virtual meeting of WHO’s executive board, Loyce Pace, Assistant Secretary for Global Affairs of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) described “the importance of equity and equitable access to medical countermeasures and the negative impacts of misinformation and disinformation related to the pandemic. We agree that we must all do better.
“The United States led an inclusive and transparent process to develop this decision, as we are mindful that updating and modernizing the IHR [International Health Regulations] are critical to ensuring the world is better prepared for and can respond to, the next pandemic.”
Among the proposed U.S. amendments, one removes an existing requirement in Section 9 that WHO “consult with and seek to obtain verification” from officials in a nation in which a health crisis is suspected before making any public declarations. The same amendment provides that “WHO may take into account reports from sources other than notifications or consultations” from the nation with the suspected problem.
A proposed change to Section 5 would direct WHO to establish “early warning criteria for assessing and progressively updating the national, regional, or global risk posed by an event of unknown causes or sources.”
A proposed amendment to Section 10 requires that the WHO, in the event the nation with the suspected problem doesn’t cooperate within 48 hours, shall “when justified by the magnitude of the public health risk, immediately share with other [nations] the information available to it.”
Nowhere do the amendments or accompanying documents explain how or why U.S. public health officials believe the equity issue in health care would be addressed by giving Tedros the authority to declare a public health emergency on the basis of information provided by a source other than the affected nation.
A search of the White House Press Office website found only one veiled reference to the WHO amendments. That reference was in a Feb. 2 Fact Sheet issued by the White House saying the U.S. “will continue to advance health security and pandemic preparedness abroad, including through strengthening WHO, working with partners towards targeted IHR amendments.”
The proposed amendment Section 5 of the WHO regulations also appears to parallel the Biden administration’s reference in a fact sheet on its proposed 2023 federal budget that was issued in April.
That reference commits the Biden administration to support “global threat detection innovations through a globally connected network of public health surveillance systems that optimizes disease prevention and health promotion as we strengthen surveillance initiatives to provide necessary actionable data before, during, and after a pandemic.”
“The budget includes $2.47 billion in mandatory funding for CDC to include enhancements to domestic sentinel surveillance programs, expansion of domestic and global wastewater surveillance, and investments in global genomic surveillance approaches, as well as global respiratory disease surveillance platforms,” the fact sheet states.
Respiratory surveillance platforms include video cameras and recorders that alert authorities when members of the public are seen coughing or otherwise acting in a manner that could indicate the presence of an infectious disease or help spread one already present in a population. Such equipment is widely used in China.
The Biden WHO amendments are the latest step in the current president’s efforts to reintegrate the U.S. with WHO after his predecessor, President Donald Trump, slashed U.S. funding to the international health organization and then gave notice of U.S. withdrawal.
One of Biden’s first acts as president was to withdraw Trump’s withdrawal notice and to restore U.S. funding, which accounts for half of WHO’s budget. Trump’s dissatisfaction with WHO stemmed from what he saw as the international health organization’s excessive deference to China regarding the origin of the CCP virus, which causes COVID-19.
A White House spokesman didn’t respond to The Epoch Times’ request for information on the amendments and the administration’s rationale for the proposals. An HHS spokesman also didn’t respond to The Epoch Times’ request for comment.
Critics of the amendments such as Dr. Peter Breggin, however, have not been reluctant to comment on the proposed amendments.
“The amendments would give WHO the right to take important steps to collaborate with other nations and other organizations worldwide to deal with any nation’s alleged health crisis, even against its stated wishes,” Breggin said in a May 4 post under a byline shared with his wife, Ginger Ross Breggin.
“The power to declare health emergencies is a potential tool to shame, intimidate, and dominate nations. It can be used to justify ostracism and economic or financial actions against the targeted nation by other nations aligned with WHO or who wish to harm and control the accused nation,” Breggin wrote.
Peter Breggin is a Harvard-trained psychiatrist, former U.S. Public Health Service officer, and former National Institute on Mental Health (NIMH) consultant. Ginger Ross Breggin is a journalist, author, and medical reform advocate.
Travis Weber, vice president for policy and government affairs at the Washington, D.C.-based Family Research Council, told The Epoch Times that “the American people need to express concern with the White House, especially as our president representing us on the world stage—we need an explanation of what you are doing here and why.”
Weber said Biden administration officials have “not really talked about this, so we need reporters to ask them at a press conference what are they proposing and really get them to explain it. People can express their concern about that to the White House and express concern to their members of Congress, and we need Members of Congress to challenge the administration to explain themselves. Part one of this is: ‘What is going on, what are you proposing, and why.’”
Similarly, Mat Staver, founder and chairman of the Florida-based Liberty Counsel public interest law firm, told The Epoch Times that if the U.S. decided not to cooperate with WHO on a possible health emergency, and “say you had Trump back in office who wants to pull out, or you have somebody else who doesn’t want to deal with WHO, they could bring it before the International Court at the Hague for fines or some other form of restriction. They could coordinate with their other member nations to take actions with regards to supplies, sharing data or other documentation for trade, and who knows what the consequences of that would be.”
Liberty Counsel also pointed out in a statement on May 12 that a UN report claimed in May 2021 that the pandemic would have been avoided had the international health organization had greater authority.
That report also recommended that WHO be given “an adaptable incentive regime, [including] sanctions such as public reprimands, economic sanctions, or denial of benefits” to nations that don’t cooperate with it.
https://operationdisclosureofficial...o-chief-to-declare-public-health-emergencies/
------------
WHO VICTORY UPDATE: 12 of the 13 amendments have been removed from Consideration
By Sarah Westall | SarahWestall.comAccording to journalists closely watching the developments occurring in the 2022 WHO annual meeting this week in Geneva Switzerland, 12 out of 13 amendments have been removed from consideration. This is fantastic news for citizens of the world, even for the majority of citizens everywhere that don’t realize what is actually occurring. The fight for freedom is a burden that must be taken on by those that have the awareness and knowledge to see the treachery as it unfolds.
Activist James Roguski is one of those freedom fighters who has made a huge difference by taking on this fight to expose the WHO for what it is. On his website, he states the victory that has appeared to have occurred and also warned that our fight is not over:
| PARTIAL VICTORY? – NOT GOOD ENOUGH!!! The massive response from people all over the world in opposition to the amendments to the International Health Regulations, along with legal actions in the UK (and a whole lot of prayer) seems to have resulted in 12 of the 13 amendments to the International Health Regulations being REMOVED FROM CONSIDERATION. I wonder why? The last remaining amendment that may be considered by the 75th World Health Assembly is below… https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https://bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/8d86a471-f4f5-4d2f-94da-1c42e8fd3d33_800x819.jpeg This matters because it has a direct impact on Article 61.  NOW IS NOT THE TIME TO RELAX. NOW IS THE TIME TO WORK HARDER THAN YOU EVER HAVE. |
We will have to monitor this situation and see why they did not vote on the amendments and also ensure that these amendments do not come up for vote at a later date. It is imperative that we do not let our guard down. Our freedom relies on it, literally.
That’s why it has been very important that many more news outlets and journalists have been bringing the WHO power grab to the attention of the American people on a wider scale. For example, on May 19th, Tucker Carlson reported on the amendments and the Orwellian power grab. It’s worth a listen: [video]
One American News, a fast growing network who has proven to be more trustworthy than any mass media network, also did a report on this subject on May 18th, a day before Tucker and Fox news. You can see it here: [video]
Even though we reported on this last month, URGENT: Health Treaty Taking Eyes Away from Immediate & Critical WHO Amendment Vote in May, it has been critical that many listeners, readers, and other journalists also shared this information. We must all unite to fight the globalist power grab that will surely only continue. We can celebrate our victory today, but tomorrow they will be even more crafty and will not stop. Either can we.
https://sarahwestall.com/who-victor...ndments-have-been-removed-from-consideration/
Epieikes
Active Member
Harbinger Daily's synopsis...love the title. Praising God for that "first-year law student"...!
“A first-year law student in the U.K.” objected to the amendments, Alexander explained on “Washington Watch.” He “asked the courts to review these amendments, and the court rejected him summarily. So he appealed. And then he got a letter from the government that said 12 of 13 international health regulation amendments have been taken off the table and will not be addressed at this Assembly, at least at this time.”
It’s unclear how or why the amendments were tabled. It seems they were considered by a working group comprised of member states, but the group is “not transparent,” Alexander said. “We don’t know who’s on it and who’s saying what,” or even how many nations are members—although there are rumors that Brazil and Russia opposed the amendments.
It’s also unclear whether their tabling was permanent. We also “don’t know how the approval process works. … The 12 amendments are off the table right now,” Alexander continued, but “maybe … they’ll come back on in a day or two, and they’ll be approved in some way that is not transparent to us. So we have good news for the moment, [but] we have to keep an eye on what’s happening there.”
https://harbingersdaily.com/power-g...trations-controversial-who-amendments-tabled/
“A first-year law student in the U.K.” objected to the amendments, Alexander explained on “Washington Watch.” He “asked the courts to review these amendments, and the court rejected him summarily. So he appealed. And then he got a letter from the government that said 12 of 13 international health regulation amendments have been taken off the table and will not be addressed at this Assembly, at least at this time.”
It’s unclear how or why the amendments were tabled. It seems they were considered by a working group comprised of member states, but the group is “not transparent,” Alexander said. “We don’t know who’s on it and who’s saying what,” or even how many nations are members—although there are rumors that Brazil and Russia opposed the amendments.
It’s also unclear whether their tabling was permanent. We also “don’t know how the approval process works. … The 12 amendments are off the table right now,” Alexander continued, but “maybe … they’ll come back on in a day or two, and they’ll be approved in some way that is not transparent to us. So we have good news for the moment, [but] we have to keep an eye on what’s happening there.”
https://harbingersdaily.com/power-g...trations-controversial-who-amendments-tabled/
Everlasting Life
Through Faith in Jesus
This strikes me as very unconstitutional.
One of the articles shares that contacting our representatives can be effective as some have brought this more out in the open, leading to most of the ammendments being struck. However it would be prudent for our reps to receive links to these articles and asked how they are protecting the US from this.
Prayerful action is important and we the people still have some sway, lets use it as best we can.