Will the US ambassador move to Jerusalem without the embassy?

Discussion in 'Israel & Middle East News' started by Chris, Jan 10, 2017.

  1. Chris

    Chris Administrator Staff Member

    Will the US ambassador move to Jerusalem without the embassy?
    Report claims Trump Administration to allow ambassador to live, work in Jerusalem while keeping embassy in Tel Aviv following Arab protests.
    Gary Willig, 10/01/17 20:51
    Amb. David Friedman

    David Friedman, President-elect Donald Trump's pick for the post of Ambassador to Israel, may work out of Jerusalem while the US embassy remains in Tel Aviv, according to a report by Channel 2. Friedman and Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway had stated that the incoming Trump Administration would move the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

    The pledge to relocate the embassy to Israel's capital pleased Israelis. However, Arab leaders attacked the move. Jordan said that moving the embassy to Jerusalem would "cross a red line" while PA President Mahmoud Abbas said that the move would "have a disastrous impact on the peace process."

    In addition, outgoing Secretary of State John Kerry warned that moving the embassy to Jerusalem could cause an "explosion" of violence in the Middle East. According to the report by Channel 2, the Trump Administration has decided, after extensive talks with all parties, to implement a compromise solution.

    Under the proposed compromise, incoming Ambassador David Friedman would take up residence near the American Consulate in Jerusalem and work there, while the US embassy remained in Tel Aviv. This would be an unusual step, as Ambassadors normally live in proximity to their embassies.

    Friedman already owns an apartment in Jerusalem, and he has expressed his desire to perform his duties as the US Ambassador to Israel in Jerusalem.

  2. Chris

    Chris Administrator Staff Member

    If this is true, then Trump has already compromised before he has taken office. All because of "verbal threats" of this and that. Not looking good if this article is true.
    Tall Timbers likes this.
  3. daygo

    daygo Well-Known Member

    Wouldn't surprise me but hope he goes the whole hog.
  4. DanLMP

    DanLMP Well-Known Member

    I agree that I don't like the compromise but from the perspective of Islam, having the Ambassador living in Jerusalem might be seen as defacto
    having the embassy in Jerusalem.
    Potentially the same effect without the bother of a physical move.

    What truly defines the embassy? The building or the Ambassador in it?
  5. daygo

    daygo Well-Known Member

    Good point, I'd say having the man in Jerusalem.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.