UK Govt Prosecutors Argue Parts of Bible ‘No Longer Appropriate in Modern Society’

Tall Timbers

Imperfect but forgiven
Lawyers for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) of England and Wales tried to have a Christian street preacher convicted for quoting the Bible to a lesbian couple, insisting that scripture is “no longer appropriate in modern society “.

The extraordinary case, mounted in what is still nominally a Christian church, with an established church in which the head of state serves as Supreme Governor, was brought against armed forces veteran and throat cancer survivor John Dunn, after the police referred him to prosecutors for telling a lesbian couple that it “says in the Bible that homosexuals will not inherit the kingdom of God” in Swindon.

“Whether a statement of Christian belief or not, the court is being asked to consider whether the language has the potential to cause harassment, alarm or distress,” the CPS wrote to the courts when pursuing the case, in a document quoted by the Belfast News Letter.

“This document is not the forum for religious debate, but the bible contains other material recognising slavery (Exodus 21:7), the death sentence (Exodus 35:2 and Leviticus 24:16) and cannibalism (Deuteronomy 28:27),” the prosecutors asserted — sloppily, as it turns out, as Deuteronomy 28:27 actually makes no reference to cannibalism.

“There are references in the bible which are simply no longer appropriate in modern society and which would be deemed offensive if stated in public,” the CPS insisted.

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/20...s-bible-no-longer-appropriate-modern-society/

What a dark and foolish world we live in. It's becoming easy to see thow the majority will openly war against God they know exists during the Tribulation period.
 

Aiyanna

Well-Known Member
If they reject the Word of God, why do they care that they won't be inheriting the Kingdom of God? If the courts of England or whatever, claim the Bible is outdated, why do they care what it says? If it's so outdated, why would it be offensive?

Of course, we know the answer is because, in their hearts, they know the truth, they just reject it and don't like it... But still... I like asking the questions. It just proves they put still put weight in the Bible's words even if they try to say they don't.
Kinda like when some lady told me to "keep my religion out of her body"... Why? Is it uncomfortable?
 

Everlasting Life

Through Faith in Jesus
“This document is not the forum for religious debate, but the bible contains other material recognising slavery (Exodus 21:7), the death sentence (Exodus 35:2 and Leviticus 24:16) and cannibalism (Deuteronomy 28:27),” the prosecutors asserted — sloppily, as it turns out, as Deuteronomy 28:27 actually makes no reference to cannibalism.

Shakespeare has some disturbing material as well.......
 
Back
Top