Today I was studying something related to the 2 Witnesses of Revelation 11. Afterwards, while discussing it with a friend, it suddenly occurred to me that there could be a parallel between the 2 Witnesses in Revelation 11 and the tradition of having 2 witnesses testify on Rosh Hashanah about the new moon. I've never heard or read any commentary that may link the appearance of the two Revelation 11 Witnesses that will begin their 1,260 day ministry presumably at the beginning of the Tribulation with the Jewish tradition of having a pair of witnesses testify on Rosh Hashanah to the appearance of the new moon.
From what I can find online:
How do they examine the witnesses who come to testify about the new moon? They deal with them in order, as the pair of witnesses that arrives first they examine first. They bring in the greater of the two witnesses, and they say to him: Say how you saw the moon. Was it in front of the sun or behind the sun? To its north or to its south? How high was the moon over the horizon, and in which direction did it tilt? And how wide was it? If, for example, he said that he saw the moon in front of the sun, he has not said anything of substance, as this is impossible and therefore he is either mistaken or lying. And after they finish hearing the first witness’s testimony, they would bring in the second witness and examine him in a similar manner. If their statements match, their testimony is accepted and the court sanctifies the New Moon. And the court then asks all the other pairs of witnesses certain general matters, without probing into all the details.
Could it be that God is sending His own 2 witnesses to testify to what has happened on this particular Feast?
I imagine a Feast of Trumpets rapture, the 2 Witnesses appear in Jerusalem immediately to testify about what has happened, and what will happen.
If anyone has seen this theorized anywhere else please let me know. I'd love to hear more.
Thoughts?
From what I can find online:
How do they examine the witnesses who come to testify about the new moon? They deal with them in order, as the pair of witnesses that arrives first they examine first. They bring in the greater of the two witnesses, and they say to him: Say how you saw the moon. Was it in front of the sun or behind the sun? To its north or to its south? How high was the moon over the horizon, and in which direction did it tilt? And how wide was it? If, for example, he said that he saw the moon in front of the sun, he has not said anything of substance, as this is impossible and therefore he is either mistaken or lying. And after they finish hearing the first witness’s testimony, they would bring in the second witness and examine him in a similar manner. If their statements match, their testimony is accepted and the court sanctifies the New Moon. And the court then asks all the other pairs of witnesses certain general matters, without probing into all the details.
Could it be that God is sending His own 2 witnesses to testify to what has happened on this particular Feast?
I imagine a Feast of Trumpets rapture, the 2 Witnesses appear in Jerusalem immediately to testify about what has happened, and what will happen.
If anyone has seen this theorized anywhere else please let me know. I'd love to hear more.
Thoughts?