Turkey Rekindles the Armenian Genocide

Chris

Administrator
Staff member
Turkey Rekindles the Armenian Genocide
And the U.S. unwittingly aids its NATO ally’s jihad.
By Raymond Ibrahim

Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

As it has done in other arenas where “extremists” are attacking moderates or Christians—from Syria to Libya to Nigeria—Turkey is spearheading another jihad, this time against Christian Armenia.

Context: Fighting recently erupted in the region of Nagorno-Karabakh, which borders Armenia and Azerbaijan. Although it is ethnically Armenian, after the dissolution of the USSR, the territory was allotted to Muslim Azerbaijan. Since then, hostilities and skirmishes have erupted, though the current one, if not quenched—an Azerbaijani drone was shot down above the Armenian capital and Azerbaijan is threatening to bomb Armenia’s unsecure nuclear power plant—can have serious consequences, including internationally.

By doing what it does best—funding, sponsoring, and transporting terrorists to troubled regions—Turkey has exacerbated if not sparked tensions. Several reports and testimonials, including by an independent French journalist, have confirmed that Turkey is funneling jihadi groups that had been operating in Syria and Libya—including the pro-Muslim Brotherhood Hamza Division, which kept naked, sex slave women in prison—to this latest theater of conflict.

The “quality” of these incoming “freedom fighters”—as the Western mainstream media, particularly during the Obama era, was wont to call them—is further evidenced by their attempts to enforce sharia, Islamic law, on some of their more secularized hosts in Azerbaijan.

After asking, “Why has Turkey returned to the South Caucasus 100 years [after the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire]?” Nikol Pashinyan, Armenia’s prime minister, answered in a statement: “To continue the Armenian Genocide.” This is a reference to the well documented massacre of an estimated 1.5 million Armenians, 750,000 Greeks and 300,000 Assyrians—a total of 2.5 million Christians—slaughtered at the hands of Turks and in the name of jihad.

While Pashinyan is correct in characterizing the latest hostilities as a reflection of Turkey’s attempt “to continue the Armenian Genocide” of the nineteenth-twentieth centuries, in fact, the continuum of Turkic attacks on Armenia stretch back more than a thousand years ago, when the Turks first cleansed the Armenians from their ancient homeland, also in accordance with jihadi ideology.

Then and now, Azerbaijanis participated. During one of the eleventh century jihads on Armenia, the great cross of an ancient church was torn down, mocked and desecrated, and then sent to adorn a mosque in Azerbaijan; more recently, after hostilities erupted, Azerbaijanis surrounded the Armenian embassy in Washington, D.C. this last summer, while chanting about jihad.

The Armenian prime minister continues:

For Turkey, however, continuing a genocidal policy is not only a means of implementing Armenophobia, but also a pragmatic task. Armenia and the Armenians of the South Caucasus are the last remaining obstacle on the way of continued Turkish expansion towards the North, the North East, and the East, and the realization of its imperialistic dream.

It is no longer merely the Karabakh issue, nor a security issue of the Armenian people. It is now an issue of international security, and today, the Armenian people are defending also international security, assuming what may be a new historic mission.


In other words, he is saying that only Christian Armenia (Georgia would be included too) stands between Turkey and some sort of unification with the many Muslim nations to its east (the “Stans,” e.g., Turkmenistan).

Certainly Turkey’s ambitions are not to be doubted. Whether by citing history’s most sadistic jihadis as paragons of virtue and emulation, or by transforming the Hagia Sophia into a mosque, or by helping to destabilize moderate Muslim governments and slaughter Christians with its jihadi militias, Turkey’s imperialistic dreams of resuccisitating the Ottoman Empire have been increasingly on display.

The editor-in-chief of Yeni Safak, a Turkish newspaper, recently called for as much in an article partially titled “Turkey is a global power. Now it’s time for Azerbaijan to rise.” After saying that Turkey had taken “a century-long hiatus” from its “geopolitical” ambitions and its “region-builder mind that founded very powerful empires on earth,” the Turkish daily claimed that “Our aim is not to spread conflicts but to replace, reinstate what rightfully belongs to us. Our aim is to keep alive and maintain our region, our people, our resources, our identity, and belonging.”

Despite all this and as it was during Obama’s role in the “Arab Spring,” the U.S. finds itself on the side of the jihad, even if unwittingly. “The international community, especially the American society,” Pashinyan warned, “should be aware that U.S.-made F-16s are being used to kill Armenians in this conflict.” Because both the U.S. and Turkey are NATO members, Turkey is acquiring and using against Armenians weapons from the U.S.

And so history continues to repeat itself—in all ways.

https://www.raptureforums.com/israel-middle-east/turkey-rekindles-the-armenian-genocide/
 

Chris

Administrator
Staff member
From the article:

In other words, he is saying that only Christian Armenia (Georgia would be included too) stands between Turkey and some sort of unification with the many Muslim nations to its east (the “Stans,” e.g., Turkmenistan).

I think this bears watching as it will provide the necessary alignment for the Gog/Magog situation. I am hating to think what this means for Armenia. Please pray for them. :pray
 

athenasius

Well-Known Member
The word genocide was invented because of the Turks attempt to wipe out all of Armenia. They are back at it, as Erdogan tries to recapture the borders of the ancient Ottoman Empire. Sickening.
 

Uturn9319

Member
The word genocide was invented because of the Turks attempt to wipe out all of Armenia. They are back at it, as Erdogan tries to recapture the borders of the ancient Ottoman Empire. Sickening.
For someone no one pins as "Gog", there's times I wish it would be him...
 

athenasius

Well-Known Member
For someone no one pins as "Gog", there's times I wish it would be him...
He may not be Gog but it would not be a stretch if the AC arose from someone in his bureaucracy or even his family. Erdogan is not the AC, at least not so far but there are possibilities looking at Turkey and Syria and people coming from there. I have nobody in mind, although it is interesting to me that Erdo's oldest lives a life of total obscurity that cost a LOT of money to achieve and he doesn't seem to enjoy his father's dreams of the revived caliphate. But we won't know till after because the actual AC doesn't show up till after we go up.

Daniel 11 covers a lot of history. The "king of the north" in that chapter in the past refers to the Seleucid Empire which covered Syria and Turkey. The break from past to future as far as we are concerned happens around vs 36 and onwards.

But here in the future Trib Daniel is still talking about the "king of the north". Yet this king is the Antichrist.

So taking into consideration that Rome ruled over this area, the Roman troops that torched Jerusalem CAME FROM TURKEY AND SYRIA and that the far north refers to someone else-- Daniel 11: 44 suggests that Russia has begun to recover it's threatening abilities some time after the whole Gog Magog thing is over but that separates this king of the north-- the Seleucid area from the farthest north.

we could possibly see a future AC rising from the area fulfilling all the prophecies exactly to the letter. I am NOT suggesting a muslim AC merely that one man may arise from that area, who doesn't follow the belief of his fathers (Islam or Christianity, because this is the area of the early and later the Byzantine church) and is "Roman" because Rome covered a lot of area in those days including Turkey and Syria.

There is one other interesting point-- that is how the whole Gog Magog thing influences the rise of the AC. Russia gets taken out. Turkey gets bumped back. Damascus is missing yet somehow, someone rises in the ashes of the area of the old Assyrian empire (one of the names of the AC elsewhere is "the Assyrian").

Probably no longer a muslim due to the way things went with Gog Magog, which might possibly put the milder versions of Islam in line with the post Rapture remnants of church beaurocracy under the leadership of some Pope or other.

Maybe the future AC will become an atheist or agnostic at that point or decide worshipping the "god of forces" is more his thing. Interesting to think about.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top