These Quotes Reveal The Credulity Of Evolutionists:

mattfivefour

Administrator
Staff member
I agree.

Now, in some cases the quotes above ARE from scientists trying to argue FOR evolution. But their quotes are still relevant because they demonstrate in their own words that they are arguing for evolutionary theory DESPITE the lack of evidence for it. Their reasoning, as the Huxleys admit, is because they simply cannot accept the existence of God.
 
Richard Lewontin, who had served as the Alexander Agassiz Professor of Zoology and Professor of Biology at Harvard, observed the following:

Our willingness to accept scientific claims that are against common sense is the key to an understanding of the real struggle between science and the supernatural. We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door. The eminent Kant scholar Lewis Beck used to say that anyone who could believe in God could believe in anything. To appeal to an omnipotent deity is to allow that at any moment the regularities of nature may be ruptured, that miracles may happen.
(emphasis mine)

Source: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1997/01/09/billions-and-billions-of-demons/

Apparently, there is a preference for explanations that do not involve the Lord and that must adhere to "materialistic" causes (i.e. "no creator").
 

mattfivefour

Administrator
Staff member

DanLMP

Well-Known Member
Richard Lewontin, who had served as the Alexander Agassiz Professor of Zoology and Professor of Biology at Harvard, observed the following:



(emphasis mine)

Source: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1997/01/09/billions-and-billions-of-demons/

Apparently, there is a preference for explanations that do not involve the Lord and that must adhere to "materialistic" causes (i.e. "no creator").
Yet, when you do a rational review of the positions of the evolutionists, naturalists and atheists, you find they need to rely even more on supernatural causes of the universe.

They claim that we rely on unscientific supernatural causes yet all of their claims are unscientific and supernatural too.

So one question that I have is, how does an extremely long string of extremely improbable events transition dumb chemicals into thinking man?

It requires a complete abandonment of rationality to believe what evolutionists believe. I don't recommend that any of them go anywhere near Vegas or they will loose their pants.
 

Kerbluey

Well-Known Member
I had to study anatomy and medical stuff a few years ago. At the end of it I realized in order to believe it’s all random takes work. The logical, natural, effortless conclusion is to be astounded by the way the body works. It takes an intentional effort to suppress that response and conclude it’s random.
 
Top