The United Nations wants a one-world government in less than twelve years

Discussion in 'One World Government and Economics' started by Kaatje, Nov 8, 2018.

  1. Kaatje

    Kaatje Well-Known Member

    November 5, 2018 (American Thinker) – In the 1960s, an informed but naïve undergraduate, I was walking across the campus of the University of Pennsylvania with the Chairman of the Chemistry Department, Prof. Charles C. Price. He told me that he was president of the United World Federalists, and asked if I knew what that organization was. When I said that I did not, he replied that they believed in a one-world government that would grow out of the United Nations. I was nonplussed as I had never heard anyone suggest that idea before. To me, the United Nations was a benevolent organization dedicated to pressuring the world community in the direction of peace, and to operating charitable programs to help the struggling, impoverished peoples of the world. I imagined the UN as a kind of United Way on a worldwide scale.

    How would Prof. Price's vision of a new world government emerge? Although there was a socialistic thread in its founding document, the United Nations was formed based on a vision of human rights presented in the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" (UDHR) which placed the concept of rights at the forefront for the progress of the world body. And rights are the mainstay for uplifting human freedom and the dignity of the individual. The UDHR document followed many amazing documents that presented rights as the central concept of the post-feudal world: the English Declaration (or Bill) of Rights of 1689, the U.S. Declaration of Independence with its important and forceful assertion of inalienable natural rights, the powerful U.S. Bill of Rights enacted in 1791, and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen (1789).

    The word "rights" appears in almost every sentence of the 1869-word UN document. The document is literally obsessed with rights, and one must assume they are likewise obsessed with the rights successes as manifested in the United Kingdom, the U.S., and France. However, there are some deviations from the rights usage we are all familiar with. In Article 3, Instead of the inalienable rights of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" found in our Declaration of Independence, the UN declares everyone's right to "life, liberty and security of person." Are they implying that security will bring happiness? Or are they implying that happiness is too ephemeral a value, and too Western? Perhaps more mundane survival goals are needed by most of the world.

    We see a reprise of items from our Bill of Rights such as condemnation of cruel and unusual punishment (Article 5), due process (Articles 6,7,8,9, 10, 11, 14, 17), illegal search and seizure (Article 12), and freedom of speech and assembly (Articles 19,20). But there are new rights introduced which, as early as 1945, were pointing the way towards intervention by the UN in the daily lives of people throughout the world. Throughout the document, they assert the right to food, clothing, medical care, social services, unemployment and disability benefits, child care, and free education, plus the right to "full development of the personality," (imagine, the UN says I have the right to be me) and the "right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community… and to enjoy the arts" (we each have the right to enjoy a painting or a movie). However, they do not state the right to appear on the "Tonight Show" or "Saturday Night Live", so there were limits to their largesse.

    In 2015, seventy years after their original rights-based document, the UN took a giant step towards the global government that was only hinted at in their first organizing document. They issued a document entitled "Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development." This document has 91 numbered sections of the UN's program for world government. The UDHR is only referenced once in the entire document in Article 19. Unlike the original "mother document" that was under 1900 words, this document is 14,883 words. The 91 items are addressing issues under the five headings of People, Planet, Prosperity, Peace, and Partnership. Additionally, the document provides 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to improve life on the planet.

    What is meant by the term "sustainable?" The most often quoted definition comes from the UN World Commission on Environment and Development: "sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." The earlier ideas and ideals of rights, freedom, equality, and justice are subsumed under meeting of needs and an explicit environmentalism which emphasizes preventing the depletion of scarce planetary resources. Of course, the takeoff is the Marxist axiom that society should be organized around the idea of "from each according to his ability to each according to his needs." Thus, Marxism is implicit in sustainability, but is nuanced by its alliance with seemingly scientific adjustments and goals related to environmentalism. A technical jargon is welded to Marxist intentionality to produce a sense of fittingness and modern progress.

    The entire "Transforming Our World" document is cast in a stream of consciousness of pious platitudes for a utopian future. It is an outsize utopian dream. Five of the 17 items pertain to the environment. There are goals for the cities, for women, for the poor, and even for life under the water. Absolutely no sphere of human activity is exempt from control by the UN. The key word of course is no longer "rights" except the oblique reference in Article 19. In fact, this writer did not see the word rights even once in this document even though that word appeared in practically every sentence of the original UN document.

    The one-worlders of the 1950s and early 1960s are now in the UN driver's seat, and they have made their move. The overlay of Marxist talk about "meeting needs" has moved to center stage. The UN has assigned itself a time frame for moving forward in its plan for planetary hegemony.

    This projected transformation detailing (yet without details) a new world order of environmental responsibility and a significant reduction of poverty and hunger never speaks to the practical dimension of vast manipulations of people by cynical leaders and ignorant bureaucrats who hold their positions through terrorism and bribery. They never discuss incompetence and corruption, twin brothers in the family of venality. The document portrays a sincere world where all those in power want to help humanity despite the daily evidence of the selfishness, corruption, murderous intents, devilish manipulations, thefts, personal immoralities, hatreds, and utter depravity of many governmental leaders in every country in the world, and among the leaders of business as well. Is not the Agenda for Sustainable Development itself one of those devilish manipulations?

    The sustainability ideal is not wedded to a Christian worldview; instead, individual liberty is submerged in a scientifically determined collectivist mindset with final decisions in the hands of the devilish, all-knowing Big Brothers. The relevance of the individual is downplayed. It is being put forward by a UN that is no longer pro-western, a much larger body than existed in 1945. Will you accept it, or is it time, more than ever before, to begin rethinking our membership in that unsustainable body?
  2. Tall Timbers

    Tall Timbers Imperfect but forgiven

    I think Trump has thrown a wrench in their timeline. We were moving quite quickly in that direction. We'll eventually have a single global government. Whether or not it is birthed out of the UN remains to be seen, although it would be logical for it to happen that way.
  3. RonJohnSilver

    RonJohnSilver Well-Known Member

    As others have noted, Trump delayed the inevitable. Had Hillary won, we would be well on our way to one world.
    RobinMc, Kaatje, sara ann and 18 others like this.
  4. madcat

    madcat Well-Known Member

    As for the UN getting their wish, they will surely get it, just not in the way the think. With the escalation in the vitriol on the left in just the last few days, I wonder if we will survive the next 12 months, let alone 12 years. Soros has activated a gazillion of his "terror cells" and is calling for the murder of Republicans, prominent pro-Trump news personalities, etc.
    It won't be pretty, especially here in the south where most conservatives are armed to the hilt.
  5. DanLW

    DanLW Well-Known Member

    I dont see a one world government happening this side of the rapture. It would take a major catastrophe (like the rapture) to do it. Why would leaders like the Saudis and other Arab princes willingly cede power? Why would the dozens and dozens of countries with highly corrupt governments be willing to cede power? They would have to want to give up power.

    The UN wants a lot of things that are pie-in-the-sky. But they have no power. They are a think tank that writes nasty-grams, mainly to Israel. That's why they tried to do a world tax a couple decades ago - so they could have their own independant military, which would give them actual power.
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2018
  6. Jeri minton

    Jeri minton Well-Known Member

    I think it will only take one or two more presidents president's to move our country in the one world direction...and they don't have to be Democrats, either...the Bushes, Clinton's, and Obama's are all in favor....George HW Bush has been in favor of it and talked about The New World Order for years..
    I don't know how much of it we will see, and I hope we are taken out before we see the legal start of it.
  7. TRex2

    TRex2 Well-Known Member

    Don't be so sure. The Saudis might not be a part of it, but Iran, Russia, and China and all of their allies around the world would actually gain power, as they would get a slice of the One World Government (OWG). I think it is quite possible it could happen this side of the Rapture, and they have a couple of templates to go by.

    One must ask: why would a bunch of sovereign states willingly cede much of their sovereignty to a central government? I don't know, but that is exactly what happened in the past 165 years in the US. Virtually all of the powers the states and he people were supposed to have has been taken by the federal government. (Mirror image happened in European Union, in 30 years.)

    And further, why would 535 legislators allow the judicial branch to usurp so very much of their authority, as has happened since 1955?

    It is man's natural tendency, to allow the encroachment of powerful governments to rule their lives. Most of mankind is naturally a herd animal, and is easily corralled by a government of wolves.
    This was shown in the appointment of Saul in the first book of Samuel, and was echoed in the writings of Machiavelli. Further, we need to remember Lord Acton's maxim: Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power tends to corrupt, absolutely.
  8. Tall Timbers

    Tall Timbers Imperfect but forgiven

    It began happening after WW I with the League of Nations. The UN is release 2 of that. Sure they don't have much in the way of power, though they're not completely powerless. What is is that the framework and structure of a Sovereign global govmint is in place visavis the UN. It might be that the global govmint that the antichrist rises to lead is "release 3".
    RobinMc, Kaatje, chaser and 10 others like this.
  9. Jan51

    Jan51 Well-Known Member

    If the rapture happens soon, as we hope/think, they may be surprised to find it fall into their laps sooner than they planned (and, more easily). :rapture
    Cindy S., RobinMc, chaser and 14 others like this.
  10. TRex2

    TRex2 Well-Known Member

    I will agree that when the Rapture happens, that will pull out all of the stops,
    and the OWG will come crashing down on whoever is left behind, but I think
    if the Rapture is several years off, we will see more of it than we would like.
  11. Betty

    Betty Well-Known Member

    The UN is all about being in control. By the time they have figured out they have making plans for the anti-Christ, it will be too late. They will have to bow down to his demands are be killed.
    Kaatje, Zade, chaser and 7 others like this.
  12. DanLMP

    DanLMP Well-Known Member

    I have always figured that the UN is in on it.
    RobinMc, Kaatje, Zade and 6 others like this.
  13. athenasius

    athenasius Well-Known Member

    I agree with all of your post, but this excerpt here really stands out. I think both Russia and China would see it as a way to gain full power over the entire world. Promise everyone they'd cede power to the UN or whatever the global entity will be called, and immediately work at cross purposes to gather all the power within the global power structure to themselves. It's how communists gain power and their attitude to holding power.

    Both Russia and China have had to let go of aspects of Communism (economics of failure eventually crashed and burnt Russia, while China has always seen the benefits of providing the West with cheap goods, while stealing all the technology of those companies foolish enough to set up factories on Chinese soil or employ cheap Chinese labour)

    but they hung onto the Communist power over their people with zero human rights in actual practice within their countries.

    I have been watching the Chinese build the Silk Road or whatever they call it, One Belt or something, and the Russians invade Syria on the terminal end of these Silk Road plans. Both powers have been cooperating with each other to topple the US petro dollar. But Russia and China BOTH have an end game in view and it's world domination. Of everything and everyone. And eventually they each want to dominate the other one.

    I can see both of them thinking they could use the one world system to their advantage by appearing to comply, then working from within to take over. It's how their twisty little brains work.
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2018
    chaser, Kem, Romans10:9 and 4 others like this.
  14. Carl

    Carl Well-Known Member

    ((new world order of environmental responsibility and a significant reduction of poverty and hunger)) This is what the dreamers want to make. I guess they figure that once everything is ready it will just materialize.

    Meanwhile the rest of the quote is what will actually happen. How they can see what is happening around the world and not realize that it will not work. Unless they use more muscle than the other dictators have. Duh, isn't that what Revelations says is going to happen?

    Come quickly Lord Jesus!
    RobinMc, chaser, John Romans and 5 others like this.
  15. Len

    Len Well-Known Member

    hmmm, and whose twisty little brain thought all of that then athenasius???? LOL
  16. TRex2

    TRex2 Well-Known Member

    And why would that surprise you?

    It isn't like we are saying they planned all of this from the start. More like this is the next logical step, and their twisty little brains think they can control the outcome of building a one world government, so they will be behind it all the way to the consummation.
  17. athenasius

    athenasius Well-Known Member

    LOL I expect the originator was the same twisty little mind that thought he could challenge God and win, and has been trying --and failing ever since.
  18. Sojourner414

    Sojourner414 Well-Known Member

    If you think about it, this planet will never be "one world" without the Lord. In prophecy, it is described that the "kings of the east" would march towards Jerusalem, and opposing them would be the Antichrist and his forces. It would seem then that the world is divided into two regimes: the AC's realm and the "kings of the east". Were they on the same side, they wouldn't be having a showdown in the Valley of Jezreel.
  19. Anewcreationinjesus

    Anewcreationinjesus Well-Known Member

    I reckon this agenda 2030 is very significant, it says it all that even my daughter's high school certificate (they get certificates as well dones for different things) described the schools emphasis on preparing the young people to be "global citizens"...I've warned my daughter about new age agenda, having researched the lucis trust etc...yep it's definitely the tower of Babel all over again! The media no doubt will continue to brainwash the public about "saving our planet" and "peaceful new humanity in a better world" - when we stick to the truth of the word, the world in its current form is actually passing away, evil men and deceivers wax worse and worse, and the lord Jesus is the only one who will bring peace! Meantime, I keep spotting phrases that pop up everywhere, from social justice to NAR to agenda 2030 ...key ones seem to be "change the world", "pioneers", "a better world", "Gods dream", "transformation"...yep, my research folder just gets bigger and bigger! I do wonder as the 190 something nations have signed this "transform our world" agenda, how they will attempt to move towards phasing it in - and the big question - how much pre rapture are we actually going to see??!
  20. luvjc

    luvjc Member

    Adding to the quoted terms associated with this:
    Sustainable Development
    Sustainable Growth
    Smart Technology
    Green Energy
    Social Justice
    Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

    They implement this agenda via I.C.L.E.I. - global government instituted at the local through ordinances and zoning laws. Pay close attention to who you elect in your local and state governments. This is where they are instituting this plan in a major way.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.