Pete, Since You Brought it Up, How “Gay” Are You?

Chris

Administrator
Staff member
Pete, Since You Brought it Up, How “Gay” Are You?
By Don Boys, PhD

In the south, it has been traditional for a young lady (debutante or “female beginner”) of high status to “come out” into adulthood. It’s a formal rite of passage into society of an educated, wealthy, sophisticated young lady now ready for the privileges and responsibilities of adulthood. It is a recognition of her availability of being a wife and mother—in that order. This coming out takes place at a ball and elegant dinner. During the evening, the debutante displays her ability to walk, sit, dance, and eat without tripping over her gown or dropping a croissant down the front of her dress.

Homosexuals also have a “coming out” but not as elaborate as the southern ladies. Most southerners pay little or no attention to the social elites’ fancy affairs since they are busy making a living. However, arrogant homosexuals seem to think that all of us want to know about when they “became aware of their sexuality” and feel a need to announce it to the world. As if we care.

Pete Buttigieg is mayor of South Bend, Indiana and is “married” to Chasten Glezman, a teacher at Montessori Academy near South Bend. Pete calls Chasten his “husband” but since that is asinine, aberrant, and not accurate, I will refer to him as his “lover.” I do that knowing I will be reminded that Time magazine gave him some credibility with a cover photo of Pete and his lover. However, Time’s rush to gush is typical of the leftist media who are willing to promote anything that is anti-biblical, anti-common sense, and anti-decency.

Glezman admitted that he and Pete met online, had their first date in South Bend in September of 2015, then he “moved to Indiana and started living with Buttigieg in 2016.” Obviously, they lived together before “marriage.”

In December of 2017, the “couple” announced their engagement and were “married” in June 2018 in the Cathedral of St. James (Episcopal) in South Bend. (That says much about everyone involved.) Following their ceremony, the couple stopped by for a short visit at a LGBTQ Pride Week block party; and then went to their wedding reception where they danced the night away with 200 guests.

Their ceremony was livestreamed on YouTube and featured a reading from Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion in the landmark 2015 same-sex “marriage” decision that made perversion legal if not moral.

I don’t hate Pete or his lover or any other homosexual, but I will not give them a pass when they or others suggest that “gayness” is not perversion, that it is normal, maybe even admirable. Nor is it bigotry to explain to uninformed readers what “gayness” is. However, with my demand to know the extent of Pete’s “gayness,” I will become the object of ridicule and rebuke, and rejection. Maybe, even more death threats. But if you love homosexuals more than you fear retaliation, you tell them the truth.

And this article will be rejected by some of the sites that normally publish my articles—for telling the truth! No doubt, I will be held in more disdain for revealing the disgusting things that homosexuals do than the homosexuals who do those disgusting things! You can expect the homosexual crowd to have a hissy fit because of this article. That is as predictable as tomorrow’s sunrise.

To emphasize my point: Pete and his lover chose to make their perversion a very public matter. They really worked at it. Pete said:

“I’m gay as a—I don’t know, think of something really gay—that’s how gay I am.”

Remember, Pete brought this up so I, as a voter, have a right to know just how “gay” Pete is. After all, he wants to be President of the United States and I want to know where he stands on important issues.

Since studies show that about half of homosexuals were seduced into perversion by age 14, I wonder if Pete would totally renounce and repudiate such a revolting practice. Just a simple disavowal with appropriate disgust thrown in will suffice.

All homosexuals are aware that their lifespan is about 20 years less than for normal people so voters should know that a homosexual president may not live to finish his term. Moreover, 70% of homosexuals admit to having at least one STD plus they are infected with other contagious diseases such as tuberculosis, pneumonia, etc. About 20% of homosexual men are infected with HIV and about half of them do not know it. Don’t voters have a right, even an obligation, to know a candidate’s health status since the candidate’s health is always an issue? Is a homosexual candidate an exception? If so, why?

Will he release his complete medical records?

Since homosexuals do many dangerous things it seems wise, considerate, thoughtful, and loving to suggest they cease such dangerous activities. After all, we strongly suggest that one should not smoke, eat much red meat, not drink, and not gain weight since those are deadly activities. Why is it unreasonable, unkind, or untoward to demand the same of homosexual candidates?

Pete admits to using marijuana while at Harvard and wants to make smoking weed legal, but does he still use marijuana, use tobacco, drink hard liquor, overeat, lose sleep, and refuse to exercise?

Homosexuals are notoriously promiscuous as reported in a six-month study of daily sexual diaries by Corey and Holmes in the New England Journal of Medicine. In that study, homosexuals “averaged 110 sex partners and 68 rectal encounters a year.” It is known that even the most devoted and long-lasting homosexual relationships are usually not monogamous. Each partner normally reserves a night out each week to “play the field.” Will Pete admit that that is too “gay”?

Studies show that almost all homosexuals practice oral sex and about half ingest semen which is as dangerous as ingesting raw blood exposing them to hepatitis A and B, gonorrhea, and HIV. Moreover, about 90% of homosexuals practice rectal sex and two-thirds do so on a regular basis. Furthermore, 17% of homosexuals admit to rubbing or ingesting the feces of homosexual partners. Will Pete admit that too is too “gay”?

About 23% of “gays” (according to the largest study ever conducted) participate in golden showers where they urinate on each other, splash each other with urine or drink urine. Now, it is a person’s own business if he has a taste for urine, but we have a right to know what Pete thinks about that. Is he “that gay”?

Will Pete repudiate the 41% of “gays” who practice fisting where one rams his fist into the rectum of his partner? Or, at times, they use carrots, bottles, flashlights, (even gerbils!) or other objects often requiring a trip to the hospital for removal. Surely, Pete will repudiate that.

Will Pete repudiate the 90% of “gays” who practice rimming which is so disgusting that I won’t continue to explain it? In doing research for my book, AIDS: Silent Killer!, the owner of a chain of homosexual bathhouses told me that often the same man is “rimmed” 20 times in a single night. Will Pete repudiate such a disgusting practice?

Surely, Pete will repudiate the 37% of homosexuals who practice sadomasochism, the 90% of homosexuals who use illegal drugs, and the 66% who admit to restroom sex.

Franklin Graham was right when he said about Pete, being gay is:

“something to be repentant of, not something to be flaunted, praised or politicized.”

In declaring that fact, Graham was showing love and concern for the mayor because God judges sin—all sin even the sin that shouldn’t even be named. Perversion results in judgment with horrible, eternal results.

If you haven’t noticed, they are no longer “gay” in Sodom.

Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives, who ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for eight years. Boys’ book, Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! is available here. Follow Dr. Boys on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D. and TheGodHaters, Twitter, and visit his blog.

https://www.raptureforums.com/politics-culture-wars/pete-since-you-brought-it-up-how-gay-are-you/
 

Chris

Administrator
Staff member
I know this thread is a little graphic in the OP, but I think people need to know the stats, health hazards, etc. of this LGBT stuff. The LGBT don't want to talk about this they would just rather focus on the "love is love" part, but there is a serious danger in this lifestyle and we should warn them. JMHO.

BTW, I think I'm going to order this book this weekend by MassResistance - http://www.healthhazardsofhomosexuality.info/

We could probably use it to give people real world info and facts on this destructive lifestyle.

ETA: Yep, I just ordered. :)
 
Last edited:

athenasius

Well-Known Member
The TRUTH sets people free. People like to have some happy little daydream about the reality of the horrors of "gay" sex. It's anything but the old definition of gay, being happy and giggly.

It's deadly and people are dying because of it. I was an RN, BEFORE the AIDS epidemic. At least in the start of that we were able to talk freely. Then the Gay Lobby began to shut down any speech, including medical people discussing ways to save lives. Because it became HOMOPHOBIC.

I noticed a lot of things. This article is truthful and it's quite mild.

The TRUTH is the ONLY thing that can set people free, from the gay man or woman (oh and btw, let's pause a moment and consider suicide rates, "spousal" abuse and "divorce" or abandonment for a fresh lover which is rife in lesbian circles)

on down to the harried doctors and nurses who are trying to A: save lives and B: prevent public health emergencies.

And Truth is the only way to get saved.
 

TrustinHim

Well-Known Member
Yes, I think it's necessary to be informed about how depraved that lifestyle is. The truth is ugly but people are more likely to reject those who practice such things for public office and any kind of close contact with their children. Boy scout leaders comes to mind. I once told a "diversity " trainer that no parent would want to send a young boy out in the woods at night with a sexual deviant. They didn't like that much, but a lot of us were not shy about rejecting the ideology that they were selling. I heard one went home with a headache.
 

Goodboy

Well-Known Member
Good article with what needs to be said!!!
Homosexuality is not about love, it is about sex, sex, sex ,sex and more sex!!!

I went to a men's college that had a whole dorm floor of homosexuals. One thing that I learned while there, is that most homosexual men will have sex with women, they just prefer men as it is more deviant!
 

JSTyler

Well-Known Member
I asked Pete on Twitter what the answer was. That America really should know. I'm probably working on getting banned there. But hopefully it will get people to think.
If they ban you @Chris , report them here;

https://whitehouse.typeform.com/to/Jti9QH

This link goes directly to the White House. It is being monitored and was created just for that sort of bias against conservatives and Christians in the public square.
 

Goodboy

Well-Known Member
I just thought about the fact that I am 65 and there is a lot in the OP article that I did not know. Well what about children? They probably don't know any of the facts presented. They probably believe the lie that homosexuality is all about love.

There is so much deception going on right now! I am just so glad that my kids are grown and really feel sorry for any parent raising young kids right now! With God's help and good sound teaching parents it can be done, but oh what a task!
 
Last edited:

ShilohRose

Well-Known Member
I know this thread is a little graphic in the OP, but I think people need to know the stats, health hazards, etc. of this LGBT stuff. The LGBT don't want to talk about this they would just rather focus on the "love is love" part, but there is a serious danger in this lifestyle and we should warn them. JMHO.

BTW, I think I'm going to order this book this weekend by MassResistance - http://www.healthhazardsofhomosexuality.info/

We could probably use it to give people real world info and facts on this destructive lifestyle.

ETA: Yep, I just ordered. :)
I ordered one, too.
 

Rocky Rivera

Well-Known Member
They deleted my post on Twitter. I posted it again. LOL
Yes, we are to tell people the truth. But, I think you're casting your pearls before swine there. These people are uninterested in the ways of the LORD. They WANT to continue in their sin, and I think only extreme adversity can change their opinions. Of course there will be people who will "curse God and die" despite the fact that He offers mercy in the midst of judgment, being satisfied with their sinful condition. Sometimes we have to let go and let God.
 

Rocky Rivera

Well-Known Member
Geez i had to skip over most of that article but got the general gist of it, another example of demonic/depraved behaviour yet society is happy to encourage this and accept as normal , i'd hate to see how much worse these acts would get once the restrainer is removed from his role
I've heard someone say before that if God does not judge San Francisco, He would have to apologize to Sodom and Gommorah. I used to agree with that, but now I don't think so. God is not obligated to do anything He does not wish. God said that He will have mercy on whom He will have mercy. Perhaps the thing that is also keeping San Francisco afloat and not sunk to the bottom of the ocean like Atlantis is the number of Christians still living in the city. The LORD did say to Abraham that He would spare the city if He found ten righteous there, therefore if you posit that He has to destroy San Francisco for committing the same abominable acts as Sodom, then you also posit that He would extend San Francisco the same mercy as Sodom -- the condition being at least ten righteous persons in the target city. Which begs the question -- what will happen to San Francisco ten minutes AFTER the Rapture? The answer is obvious -- it will be neighbors with Atlantis.
 

Spartan Sprinter 1

Well-Known Member
I've heard someone say before that if God does not judge San Francisco, He would have to apologize to Sodom and Gommorah. I used to agree with that, but now I don't think so. God is not obligated to do anything He does not wish. God said that He will have mercy on whom He will have mercy. Perhaps the thing that is also keeping San Francisco afloat and not sunk to the bottom of the ocean like Atlantis is the number of Christians still living in the city. The LORD did say to Abraham that He would spare the city if He found ten righteous there, therefore if you posit that He has to destroy San Francisco for committing the same abominable acts as Sodom, then you also posit that He would extend San Francisco the same mercy as Sodom -- the condition being at least ten righteous persons in the target city. Which begs the question -- what will happen to San Francisco ten minutes AFTER the Rapture? The answer is obvious -- it will be neighbors with Atlantis.
Ahh Good Point my friend
 

Kerbluey

Well-Known Member
I went to a men's college that had a whole dorm floor of homosexuals. One thing that I learned while there, is that most homosexual men will have sex with women, they just prefer men as it is more deviant!

Really?? That’s very interesting. I was watching an interview with Milo Yiannopolis long ago, and he basically confirmed what you said. He was discussing his efforts to go straight and admitted he gave up and preferred homosexuality. I admired his honesty as he came across as very sincere and kind of disappointed but resigned. I struggle with a sugar addiction. I can’t imagine struggling with something like this.
 
Top