Spartan Sprinter 1
Formerly known as Shaun
LOL i think he was making an indirect dig at Bill Salus without him outright saying itwell he may have a point.
I like how he used the wider context of both those passage and explained that those related context passages were also fulfilled in the past.
But as we see with Daniel and Antiochus Epiphanes, there is a past fulfillment, that points to a future one with the Antichrist, so I don't think he can say just because it was fulfilled in the past, that it can't roll around again for a future fulfillment particularly when it includes those "in that day" type of statements that often point to the Tribulation.