Chinese Scientists Claim to Impregnate Male Rat

benmcd

Well-Known Member
https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2021/06/21/chinese-scientists-claim-impregnate-male-rat/

Chinese Scientists Claim to Impregnate Male Rat​

A research paper submitted by two Shanghai-based scientists on June 16 described how they were allegedly able to impregnate a male rat and guide it through the delivery of ten healthy cubs.

The paper, currently in pre-publication status and not yet peer-reviewed, is entitled “A Rat Model of Pregnancy in the Male Parabiont.” China’s state-run Global Times summarized how the scientists were able to induce a male rat to give birth:

Male pregnancy is a unique phenomenon in syngnathidae, which refers to embryo or fetus incubation by males. However, whether male mammalian animals have the potential to conceive and get pregnant remains a mystery, said the paper.
First, the scientists conducted a surgery to produce a heterosexual parabiotic pair by joining a castrated male rat and a female one. After eight weeks, uterus transplantation was performed on the male parabiont. Then they transplanted blastocyst-stage embryos to the grafted uterus of the male parabiont and the native uterus of the female parabiont. Later they performed a Caesarean section on embryonic day 21.5, according to the paper.
The success rate of the entire experiment was very low at only 3.68 percent, but 10 cubs were successfully delivered from male parabionts by Caesarean section which grow to adulthood.
A “parabiont” means two organisms fused together so they share a common bloodstream. In other words, the scientists stitched a male and female rat together, kept them alive in that state for eight weeks, and then transplanted a uterus from the female to the male. Once the results of that surgery were stabilized, they moved embryos from the female’s natural uterus to the one implanted in the male.

According to the paper, this process was repeated with 163 pairs of surgically fused rats. Six of the males became pregnant and a total of ten pups were born, surviving into adulthood.

The authors of the paper, Zhang Rongia of Second Military Medical University and Liu Yuhan of Changhai Hospital, anticipated their achievement “may have a profound impact on reproductive biology.”

The South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported Saturday that “heated debate has erupted on the Internet in China” over the experiment. A hashtag related to the paper on Weibo, China’s version of Twitter, swiftly racked up 330 million views.

Most of the feedback appears to be negative, ranging from members of the public who found the experiment horrifying to scientists who questioned the conclusions and methodology of the paper:

“This is against the laws of nature. What is the significance of this kind of research?” one commenter wrote.
“The process is quite cruel. It’s like turning both the male and female rats into incubators,” another person said.
Ge Wei, chair professor of the faculty of health sciences at the University of Macau, said the claim that the researchers had created offspring in males was “totally wrong and misleading.”
Ge went on to explain that even with all of these surgical alterations, the female rat in each parabiontic pair did all of the work, including nursing the embryos until they could survive being extracted and relocated to the surgically implanted uterus in the male rat body.

“The animals they used in the study are actually females although the carriers are a male body. The embryos were obtained from females, developed in the transplanted female’s uterus, and supported by female hormones through the connected circulatory system. This study has little impact on reproductive biology,” he said.

Ge added that while the experiment did not really prove anything about male pregnancy, it could have some helpful ramifications for in vitro fertilization, serving as a proof-of-concept for the possibility of connecting a mother’s body to an external artificial uterus.

Emily McIvor, science policy advisor for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), saw no redeeming qualities in the experiment. She denounced the paper as “vile Frankenscience” to the UK Daily Mail, noting that “rats have nervous systems just like those of humans,” so the test subjects were subjected to incredible torment for no good reason.

“These shocking experiments are driven solely by curiosity and do nothing to further our understanding of the human reproductive system. Animals deserve to be respected and left in peace, not bred in laboratories, experimented on, and treated like disposable objects,” McIvor said.
 

TimeWarpWife

Well-Known Member
Just like Obama's phone and pen needed to be taken away from him, the Chinese government really needs to have its labs taken away from them. They've already murdered millions around the world thanks to their need to play God ~ the same One they claim not to believe in ~ when they created and unleashed their Wuhan virus. :furious Hopefully, they'll never get their hands on a frozen Mastadon like the Russians found because they couldn't resist the urge to merge its DNA with an elephant. Then we'd all be running for our lives from ginormous wooly elephants trying to kill us. :doh Like their American Democrat counterparts, they are incapable of taking a thought to its logical conclusion or consider the consequences before doing stupid things like this. Although, I will guarantee that if there was a first man to give birth the non-C section way and reports on it, I seriously doubt there'll be a second volunteer. :lol
 
Last edited:

Batman

Well-Known Member
Humans may have a biblical approval of dominion over the earth but this was a sick and twisted thing to do and definitely not contributing anything beyond being sick and twisted. I am not a whacko animal first person but absolutely believe animals should not be tortured and abused. This is disgusting.
 

Wings Like Eagles

Well-Known Member
https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2021/06/21/chinese-scientists-claim-impregnate-male-rat/

Chinese Scientists Claim to Impregnate Male Rat​

A research paper submitted by two Shanghai-based scientists on June 16 described how they were allegedly able to impregnate a male rat and guide it through the delivery of ten healthy cubs.

The paper, currently in pre-publication status and not yet peer-reviewed, is entitled “A Rat Model of Pregnancy in the Male Parabiont.” China’s state-run Global Times summarized how the scientists were able to induce a male rat to give birth:


A “parabiont” means two organisms fused together so they share a common bloodstream. In other words, the scientists stitched a male and female rat together, kept them alive in that state for eight weeks, and then transplanted a uterus from the female to the male. Once the results of that surgery were stabilized, they moved embryos from the female’s natural uterus to the one implanted in the male.

According to the paper, this process was repeated with 163 pairs of surgically fused rats. Six of the males became pregnant and a total of ten pups were born, surviving into adulthood.

The authors of the paper, Zhang Rongia of Second Military Medical University and Liu Yuhan of Changhai Hospital, anticipated their achievement “may have a profound impact on reproductive biology.”

The South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported Saturday that “heated debate has erupted on the Internet in China” over the experiment. A hashtag related to the paper on Weibo, China’s version of Twitter, swiftly racked up 330 million views.

Most of the feedback appears to be negative, ranging from members of the public who found the experiment horrifying to scientists who questioned the conclusions and methodology of the paper:


Ge went on to explain that even with all of these surgical alterations, the female rat in each parabiontic pair did all of the work, including nursing the embryos until they could survive being extracted and relocated to the surgically implanted uterus in the male rat body.

“The animals they used in the study are actually females although the carriers are a male body. The embryos were obtained from females, developed in the transplanted female’s uterus, and supported by female hormones through the connected circulatory system. This study has little impact on reproductive biology,” he said.

Ge added that while the experiment did not really prove anything about male pregnancy, it could have some helpful ramifications for in vitro fertilization, serving as a proof-of-concept for the possibility of connecting a mother’s body to an external artificial uterus.

Emily McIvor, science policy advisor for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), saw no redeeming qualities in the experiment. She denounced the paper as “vile Frankenscience” to the UK Daily Mail, noting that “rats have nervous systems just like those of humans,” so the test subjects were subjected to incredible torment for no good reason.

“These shocking experiments are driven solely by curiosity and do nothing to further our understanding of the human reproductive system. Animals deserve to be respected and left in peace, not bred in laboratories, experimented on, and treated like disposable objects,” McIvor said.
My first question would be: "And WHY is it that you would do this, again??"
 
Last edited:

Wings Like Eagles

Well-Known Member
Just like Obama's phone and pen needed to be taken away from him, the Chinese government really needs to have its labs taken away from them. They've already murdered millions around the world thanks to their need to play God ~ the same One they claim not to believe in ~ when they created and unleashed their Wuhan virus. :furious Hopefully, they'll never get their hands on a frozen Mastadon like the Russians found because they couldn't resist the urge to merge its DNA with an elephant. Then we'd all be running for our lives from ginormous wooly elephants trying to kill us. :doh Like their American Democrat counterparts, they are incapable of taking a thought to its logical conclusion or consider the consequences before doing stupid things like this. Although, I will guarantee that if there was a first man to give birth the non-C section way and reports on it, I seriously doubt there'll be a second volunteer. :lol
Yeah--this whole "experiment" falls under the category of "Stupid Human Tricks". I agree that if men had to give birth, they would have done everything to avoid it and THAT would have been the end of the human race a long time ago. LOL
 

hopefilled

Well-Known Member
What a phenomenal waste of time and resources.
The earth and its people are ripe for judgement and wrath.
It pains me to hear of such abuse of power.
Those poor wee animals....

How terrible for those who have been given such brilliant minds and surgical skills to use them for such purposes.

Please Father- send Jesus soon to extract the believers....How much more should your children witness of this evil and corrupt world.
We long for something far greater than what we see playing out before us.
Hold us in Your peace until that perfect time arrives. In Jesus name I pray. Amen.
 

Flyfisher

Well-Known Member
We surely can’t be too far away as we have too many people trying to play god. On that note and just a guess from other stuff I have read, it would not surprise me that this is china’s attempt to create an artificial womb. This would allow them to control procreation at the government level. This would make it possible for absolute control of population.
 

Ghoti Ichthus

Pray so they do not serve alone. Ephesians 6:10-20
China . . . lab rat . . . what could possibly go wrong :eek

This isn't experimentation out of curiosity's sake. This is blatantly satanic in origin, just like the wuhan virus :tappingfoot

This is what happens when a country and its Institutional Review Boards (IRB) have no Judeo-Christian morals or scruples to determine what to fund and what to research.

*IRB members are the people, who review and approve research projects for feasibility, legality, ethics, etc., and funnel $$$ to approved research. In the U.S., every university has its own IRB. Various government entities, which oversee and/or conduct research, have IRBs, as well.


:pray :pray :amen :amen
 

Footsteps

Well-Known Member
It could relate to climate change. I just saw a clip from a science conference (a few years ago) in which a Chinese scientist used the phrase “human engineering”. His point was that if we could breed humans three centimeters shorter, the overall reduction in humankind’s carbon emissions would be huge...
 

Footsteps

Well-Known Member
This goes beyond the climate change issue. As Wings Like Eagles said, this is a direct affront to God. God made all living things and these deviants may be visualizing a Planet of the Apes styled army for all we know. This whole Man Is His Own God philosophy reminds me of The Island of Dr. Moreau!
God spare us, right here on YOUR PLANET or transport us to the clouds!!
 

Ghoti Ichthus

Pray so they do not serve alone. Ephesians 6:10-20
It could relate to climate change. I just saw a clip from a science conference (a few years ago) in which a Chinese scientist used the phrase “human engineering”. His point was that if we could breed humans three centimeters shorter, the overall reduction in humankind’s carbon emissions would be huge...
So that's why TPTB are trying to corrupt/limit our diet . . . poorer nutrition equates to less growth/shorter stature :mad
 

AWillow

Peace that passes all understanding.
This goes beyond the climate change issue. As Wings Like Eagles said, this is a direct affront to God. God made all living things and these deviants may be visualizing a Planet of the Apes styled army for all we know. This whole Man Is His Own God philosophy reminds me of The Island of Dr. Moreau!
God spare us, right here on YOUR PLANET or transport us to the clouds!!
I agree and all of this I don’t even agree with IVF this is not our place we are not creators of life we shouldn’t be toying with it-
 

Wings Like Eagles

Well-Known Member
So that's why TPTB are trying to corrupt/limit our diet . . . poorer nutrition equates to less growth/shorter stature :mad
They are also trying to kill us through the poisons that they put in our food, while they dine on pure, organic foods. Glyphosate is a slow poison (and a probable carcinogen) and the chemical agriculture (A.K.A. Big Agriculture) crowd (which is the same crowd who promote and own Big Pharma) are putting glyphosate in as many of our foods as possible. That way, they get a "twofer"--they get to sell us their glyphosate poison and then, they get to sell us cancer drugs. They ignore regenerative farming practices which, if followed, would eliminate most, if not all agricultural chemicals.
 
Top