BLM-Linked Group Targeting SCOTUS Justices' Homes Offering Stipends to Activists

Tall Timbers

Imperfect but forgiven
A group targeting the homes of originalist Supreme Court Justices are, according to their website, paying those who join the efforts in the form of stipends funded by an unknown source that is tied to radical leftist groups including the embattled Black Lives Matter organization.

Going by the name "Ruth Sent Us," a reference to late Supreme Court Just Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the group has been posting online looking for activists with various skills to target Justices at their homes. In a thread posted by Carrie Severino, the organization is seen seeking individuals to participate in "peaceful protests" outside the homes of current Supreme Court Justices who — according to POLITICO's reporting of the leaked draft opinion — joined Justice Alito in overturning Roe v. Wade.

The Ruth Sent Us website also asks, "Are you a muralist or chalk artist? Are you a graphic designer who would like to contribute remotely?" apparently seeking artists for "large-scale art" that will be "included in the protests against the Supreme Court."

"Stipends available," the appeal notes.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/spenc...homes-offering-stipends-to-activists-n2606817

Praying for our "radical" :rolleyes: justices and their families. :pray:pray:pray
 

NewWine2020

Well-Known Member
A group targeting the homes of originalist Supreme Court Justices are, according to their website, paying those who join the efforts in the form of stipends funded by an unknown source that is tied to radical leftist groups including the embattled Black Lives Matter organization.

Going by the name "Ruth Sent Us," a reference to late Supreme Court Just Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the group has been posting online looking for activists with various skills to target Justices at their homes. In a thread posted by Carrie Severino, the organization is seen seeking individuals to participate in "peaceful protests" outside the homes of current Supreme Court Justices who — according to POLITICO's reporting of the leaked draft opinion — joined Justice Alito in overturning Roe v. Wade.

The Ruth Sent Us website also asks, "Are you a muralist or chalk artist? Are you a graphic designer who would like to contribute remotely?" apparently seeking artists for "large-scale art" that will be "included in the protests against the Supreme Court."

"Stipends available," the appeal notes.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/spenc...homes-offering-stipends-to-activists-n2606817

Praying for our "radical" :rolleyes: justices and their families. :pray:pray:pray

Shouldn’t BLM be out “Buying large mansions?”

Can’t believe they still have a foot soldier base after it was proven that they took everyone’s money and embezzled it.

BLM has never improved the quality of life for any person of color…if anything, they are responsible for attempting to set race relations backwards to the 1960’s.
 

NewWine2020

Well-Known Member
BLM is nothing but your typical socialist group-greedy for themselves, uncaring of others and complete terroristic fascists when it comes to trying to gain superiority.

It’s really telling how the “trained Marxists” who are the leaders of this brain dead race-baiting army become Uber-capitalists and go on a spending spree buying real estate with money given to them by their supporters.

Marxism fails to account for human nature and this has been proven every place and in every time it’s been attempted.
 

jeanie

Well-Known Member
Shouldn’t BLM be out “Buying large mansions?”

Can’t believe they still have a foot soldier base after it was proven that they took everyone’s money and embezzled it.

BLM has never improved the quality of life for any person of color…if anything, they are responsible for attempting to set race relations backwards to the 1960’s.
So ' follow the money'..where/who is still funding this 'Ruth sent us'. Or New BLM??
 

DWB

Well-Known Member
Some people will do anything for money. It wouldn't surprise me to find out most of these protesters are actually paid activists. Thousands of people don't just materialize outside the Supreme Court building without some prodding, and also do that many people really care about abortion?
 

Tall Timbers

Imperfect but forgiven

AG Merrick Garland Refuses to Enforce Laws Protecting SCOTUS​

The pro-baby-slaughtering protests, chanting, and screaming outside the homes of six Supreme Court justices violate federal law, and Joe Biden’s attorney general refuses to enforce that law.

Here it is in black and white: 18 U.S. Code § 1507 – Picketing or parading:

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

The law is strikingly clear. It is a crime to protest “in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge” with “the intent of influencing any judge.”

And yet, even though this is the law, hundreds of pro-abortion loons are flagrantly violating this law by doing exactly that: protesting outside the residences of six justices in the hopes of persuading them to rule a certain way.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...rland-refuses-enforce-laws-protecting-scotus/
 

Footsteps

Well-Known Member

AG Merrick Garland Refuses to Enforce Laws Protecting SCOTUS​

The pro-baby-slaughtering protests, chanting, and screaming outside the homes of six Supreme Court justices violate federal law, and Joe Biden’s attorney general refuses to enforce that law.

Here it is in black and white: 18 U.S. Code § 1507 – Picketing or parading:

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

The law is strikingly clear. It is a crime to protest “in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge” with “the intent of influencing any judge.”

And yet, even though this is the law, hundreds of pro-abortion loons are flagrantly violating this law by doing exactly that: protesting outside the residences of six justices in the hopes of persuading them to rule a certain way.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...rland-refuses-enforce-laws-protecting-scotus/
Best example of dual justice system. Nancy refused to sign a bill protecting Supreme Court Justices with federal security Friday. When asked about her refusal, she said “Nothing will happen before Monday.”
Merrick sounds like a used car salesman.
 

Jaybird

Well-Known Member
He will likely make it the Great White Throne Judgement. I know I should't judge, but we know where the the atheist communists end up if they don't see the light. Just like everyone else.
 

Jaybird

Well-Known Member
Garland is the one who told the FBI to investigate parents who were concerned about their school board introducing Critical Race Theory to their children at school. No, we can't have the parents harass the school board and have them teach our children things that they shouldn't be taught! How evil to want to brainwash children! The world gets more wicked with each passing day. I'm so sick of all this - Maranatha!!!!
 

jab777

Well-Known Member
So glad Garland didn't make it onto the Supreme court.
Yes. We dodged a bullet on that and maybe part of why he’s not following the law and protecting the justices is a case of sour grapes because he wasn’t considered for confirmation to the Court. But the person he needs to blame is Barack Obama for choosing him. Obama could have passed on naming anyone but he couldn’t resist doing so.
 

Cloud Watcher

Well-Known Member
I was just imagining...what if he had to stand in front of the founding fathers to be judged. Meanwhile, just outside the door, there's a long line of other politicians waiting for their turn. How many of the current crop would be able to leave unscathed? How few would hear,"Good job for trying to preserve the republic"?
 

Jaybird

Well-Known Member
Just imagine when he stands before Jesus at the Great White Throne Judgement. What did Jesus say about hurting children? Something about flinging yourself into the sea with a millstone tied around their neck.
 
Top