DanLMP
Well-Known Member
The “initial creative being” is a personal sentient being (with force)
Explanation:
To further explore the idea of who this “initial creative being” is it would be helpful to wonder:
Our argument assumes that prior to this being or non-sentient force creating anything, there was nothing else in existence besides this being or non-sentient force. We state this as being inherently true and the statement actually follows the arguments provided by current physics and cosmology.
We assume this creative being or non-sentient force is a personal sentient being because:
Explanation:
To further explore the idea of who this “initial creative being” is it would be helpful to wonder:
- Either the “initial creative being” is an impersonal being or non-sentient force
- Or the “initial creative being” is a personal sentient being (with force)
Our argument assumes that prior to this being or non-sentient force creating anything, there was nothing else in existence besides this being or non-sentient force. We state this as being inherently true and the statement actually follows the arguments provided by current physics and cosmology.
We assume this creative being or non-sentient force is a personal sentient being because:
- Everything we are comes from the creative being or non-sentient force
- We ourselves are personal sentient beings
- The initial creative being or force can’t create something that it itself does not have
- Therefore, the creative being or force must be a personal sentient being and not an impersonal non-sentient force.