Air Force Admits HAARP Successfully Controlled the Weather

Pebbles

Well-Known Member
http://woundedamericanwarrior.com/air-force-bombshell-admits-they-can-control-weather-haarp/#

From Geoengineering watch: While HAARP and weather control has been called a conspiracy theory by the mainstream media and government officials, during a Senate hearing on Wednesday, David Walker, deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force for science, technology and engineering, dropped a bombshell in answer to a question asked by Lisa Murkowski in relation to the dismantling of the $300 million High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program in Gakona this summer.

Walker said this is “not an area that we have any need for in the future” and it would not be a good use of Air Force research funds to keep HAARP going. “We’re moving on to other ways of managing the ionosphere, which the HAARP was really designed to do,” he said. “To inject energy into the ionosphere to be able to actually control it. But that work has been completed.



Many believe HAARP was created and has been used for weather control, with enough juice to trigger hurricanes, tornadoes and earthquakes and comments such as this bring about the question of whether conspiracy theorists are more on target than anyone has admitted to date.

This is not the first time a public official has acknowledged that HAARP and weather control is not only possible, but has been and continues to be, used as a “super weapon,” as evidenced by a statement in 1997 by former U.S. Defense Secretary William Cohen, where he said “Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations…It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our [counterterrorism] efforts.”

Is it still just a conspiracy theory if public officials admit it is true?

 

Pebbles

Well-Known Member
In the following, note the language: "...immediately order the permanent termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States and their components." Not "immediately order the prevention." You can't terminate something that doesn't exist.

For those who still think things like weather modification and mood management are conspiracy theories, read this in its entirety and use logical thinking, not emotion.

https://www.fas.org/sgp/congress/2001/hr2977.html

HR 2977 IH

107th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2977
To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
October 2, 2001
Mr. KUCINICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL
To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.


  • Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

  • This Act may be cited as the `Space Preservation Act of 2001'.
SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF POLICY ON THE PRESERVATION OF PEACE IN SPACE.

  • Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating that it `is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.'.
SEC. 3. PERMANENT BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE.

  • The President shall--

    • (1) implement a permanent ban on space-based weapons of the United States and remove from space any existing space-based weapons of the United States; and

    • (2) immediately order the permanent termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States and their components.
SEC. 4. WORLD AGREEMENT BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS.

  • The President shall direct the United States representatives to the United Nations and other international organizations to immediately work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing a world agreement banning space-based weapons.
SEC. 5. REPORT.

  • The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, a report on--

    • (1) the implementation of the permanent ban on space-based weapons required by section 3; and

    • (2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing the agreement described in section 4.
SEC. 6. NON SPACE-BASED WEAPONS ACTIVITIES.

  • Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of funds for--

    • (1) space exploration;

    • (2) space research and development;

    • (3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not related to space-based weapons or systems; or

    • (4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems.
SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.

  • In this Act:

    • (1) The term `space' means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.

    • (2)(A) The terms `weapon' and `weapons system' mean a device capable of any of the following:

      • (i) Damaging or destroying an object (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by--

        • (I) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object;

        • (II) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object;

        • (III) directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object; or

        • (IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means.

      • (ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)--

        • (I) through the use of any of the means described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B);

        • (II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or

        • (III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.

    • (B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as--

      • (i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;

      • (ii) chemtrails;

      • (iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;

      • (iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;

      • (v) laser weapons systems;

      • (vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and

      • (vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.

    • (C) The term `exotic weapons systems' includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.
 

Almost Heaven

Well-Known Member
This is an internet hoax-debunked by snopes in 2002 and still floating around-and old favorite of the UFO crowd.

So what really happened? In a nutshell, Kucinich did not write the bill (or read it, until too late), the focus of the bill is nothing to do with chemtrails, it was written by UFO enthusiasts Alfred Webre and Carol Rosin, who were trying to:

  1. Nullify a vast conspiracy by the “military-industrial complex”
  2. Allow the use of suppressed alien technology for free energy
  3. Avoid accidentally shooting down (or scaring away) visiting aliens.
They listed a bunch of weird weapons, including mind control, tectonic weapons and (very briefly) chemtrails. The bill was re-written several time in less unusual language to give it chance of passing, but ultimately fizzled in committee.

The specific act was HR 2977, the “Space Preservation Act of 2001″, the stated goal of which was:

“To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.”

The initial version of the act is the only one that makes mention of “exotic weapons systems”, listing several technologies that will be familiar to conspiracy theorists:

(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;
(ii) chemtrails;
(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;
(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;
(v) laser weapons systems;
(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and
(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.

Yes, it even includes “extraterrestrial weapons”, meaning weapons created by aliens (or created from alien technology from crashed flying saucers at Roswell), as well as psychotronic (mind control) weapons. Yet somehow “chemtrails” gets all the attention here.

Who wrote this? The original language for the bill was actually created by Alfred Webre and Carol Rosin. See, from Webre’s web site:

http://www.exopolitics.com/

With Dr. Carol S. Rosin and many others, [Webre] is a co-architect of the Space Preservation Act and the Space Preservation Treaty introduced to the U.S. Congress by Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) to ban space-based weapons.

And also

http://www.exopoliticsinstitute.org/advisory-board-PP&M.htm#Webre

With others, Webre is a co-architect of the Space Preservation Treaty (www.peaceinspace.org ) and the Space Preservation Act that was introduced to the U.S. Congress by Congressman Dennis Kucinich and is endorsed by over 270 NGO’s worldwide.

Webre and Rosin started an organization called the “Institute For Cooperation In Space“, an organization whoseprimary purpose is to promote adoption of the Space Preservation Act. The ICIS states on its web site in part:

Humanity is on the threshold of a quantum leap in consciousness and endeavor.We must now take action to preserve this grand opportunity by preventing the weaponization of space.

We have a critical choice – to explore the great unknown of outer space or to risk continued suffering and disasters, devastation or obliteration. We can rise above different perspectives and actions that didn’t, don’t, and won’t cause second order change, actions that recognize our high consciousness and human potential applied with out-of-the-box thinking and intention to cause second order change, or we can continue the status quo of protesting the old and accepting the same that would only lead us to more violence instead of peace.

The whole site has a very “new-age” feel to it. Seemingly if only this act is passed, the military-industrial complex will turn from its warlike ways, and humanity will enter a new age of cooperation, progress and raised consciousness. The rationale for a weapons ban is never clearly explained. Nor is it explained why having weapons in space will prevent normal research and exploration of space. Obviously we would all like to see less deadly weapons floating over our heads, but is a total ban vital to the next stage of human evolution? ICIS seems to think so.

Indeed, when you talk about things in simple terms, an “international ban on weapons in space” sounds like a great idea. Like a ban on chemical weapons, it saves money and makes the world a safer place. So it’s not hard to get people to support such a ban.

The more well-known face of the ICIS, is Carol Rosin. Rosin claims that in 1974 rocket scientist Werner Von Braun told her “Carol, you will stop the weaponization of space”, and described to her a vast conspiracy by the military-industrial complex to raise a series of fears to justify space-based weapons. Since then, Rosin has dedicated her life to exposing this conspiracy, and allowing humanity to expand it’s consciousness into space.Here’s a video of her explaining this.

The video shows Rosin speaking at “The Disclosure Project“, an organization working to “disclose the facts about UFOs, extraterrestrial intelligence, and classified advanced energy and propulsion systems.” Rosin herself only briefly touches on this in her speech, but it is clear she believes that the government has alien technology, and is withholding it from the people.The other board members on the ICIS are co-founder Alfred Webre, Brian O’Leary and Daniel Sheehan, all of whom are deeply involved with The Disclosure Project.

http://contrailscience.com/kucinich-chemtrails-and-hr-2977/
snopes.com: Stolen Skies: The Chemtrail Mystery
msgboard.snopes.com › snopes.com › Archived Forums › Spook Archive
 

Pebbles

Well-Known Member
More links. Not attacking you, Almost Heaven, just so that's clear. :)

Yes, it even includes “extraterrestrial weapons”, meaning weapons created by aliens (or created from alien technology from crashed flying saucers at Roswell), as well as psychotronic (mind control) weapons.
Fallen angel shenanigans, NOT "aliens". Not difficult at all to think governments have fallen angel technology, past societies did. Extraterrestrial can also mean "space-based", as was noted.

With Dr. Carol S. Rosin and many others, [Webre] is a co-architect of the Space Preservation Act and the Space Preservation Treaty introduced to the U.S. Congress by Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) to ban space-based weapons.
https://books.google.com/books?id=s...ow frequency weapons systems military&f=false [The Setup: Memoirs of an NSA Security Operation Second Edition]
http://www.space.com/19-top-10-space-weapons.html
http://www.darpa.mil/program/magneto-hydrodynamic-explosive-munition
http://www.space.com/5292-darpa-works-perfect-forging-high-velocity-spears.html [This one is interesting, especially if successful- molten metal "spears" that can penetrate armor...]

Here's some interesting stuff on weather modification, which includes tampering with hurricanes (start on page eight for the first one):

http://www.gao.gov/assets/210/200512.pdf
http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf
http://www.colorado.edu/geography/class_homepages/geog_3402_s07/Travis_geoengineering.pdf
http://rams.atmos.colostate.edu/cotton/archives/GKSS-cropped.pdf
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gsd/media/hotitems/2008/08Apr21.html

(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;
http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/Articles/98spring/thomas.html
http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/files/Bioeffects_of_Selected_Non-Lethal_Weapons.pdf

plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons
http://www.kpbs.org/news/2013/aug/30/navy-says-its-probably-about-bomb-hundreds-dolph/
http://www.nrdc.org/wildlife/marine/sonar.asp
http://www.businessinsider.com/look...sonic-weapon-to-help-clear-protesters-2011-11
http://www.military.com/video/off-duty/tech/new-progress-on-plasma-weapons/2324951333001/
http://www.gizmag.com/laser-induced-plasma-channel/23117/

(v) laser weapons systems
http://time.com/3628047/navy-laser-weapon-test-persian-gulf/
http://www.military.com/daily-news/...eapons-ready-to-protect-ships-in-persian.html
http://www.military.com/video/direc...-laser-weapon-system-live-fire/3936845636001/

(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons
I've already posted strategic/theater/tactical links in other threads here. Jade Helm can fit under all three, I think. I am not sure if the following fit under this last section.

http://humanterrainsystem.army.mil/
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...clR01n1LXcUOQCA&bvm=bv.95515949,d.cGU&cad=rja [CIWAG Case Study on Irregular Warfare and Armed Groups: An Operator's Guide to Human Terrain Teams, courtesy of the United States Naval War College.]

(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons
http://www.un-documents.net/enmod.htm
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-ul...owning-the-weather-for-military-use-2/5306386
http://www.examiner.com/article/what-is-tectonic-weaponry-manmade-earthquakes-video

Mind control (not just "controlling thoughts", but conditioning for desired responses and moods, etc. [such as automatically scoffing at 'conspiracy theories']). Not even going to get into this one, as it's been proved to death (oddly, older folks seem to suffer from the FWE [Frog Water Effect...I think Pixelpusher or Paidinfull came up with that] with this particular subject more so than younger folks):

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles...hical-battle-concerning-military-mind-control
http://www.livescience.com/40172-declassified-military-cia-secrets.html

This line may be from The Matrix, but it is worth repeating:

"You take the blue pill, the story ends. You wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes."
 
Top