A number of undersea cables have been cut recently

athenasius

Well-Known Member
As Garak the spy, a fictional character on the TV series Deep Space Nine once famously observed: "I believe in coincidences. Coincidences happen every day. But I don't trust coincidences."

And neither do I but I don't draw immediate conclusions either. These coincidences are piling up and may or may not be linked.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-63326102 -- in which we learn that not one but TWO undersea cables are damaged in a mysterious incident last week that Nicola Sturgeon the first minister said "was accidental, adding: "There is nothing to suggest otherwise, but work is continuing to assess exactly what the cause of the problem has been."

Accidental but they don't know for sure. Here's a clue. One maybe but two? In very far apart areas no less.

Another official blames fishing boats "The cable that was damaged between Faroe and Shetland last week will be repaired on Saturday, according to Faroese Telecom's head of infrastructure Páll Vesturbú.
He said: "The damage is affecting most of telecom services to Shetland. There are some services still working but we will try to establish more services during the day if that's possible.
"We expect it will be fishing vessels that damaged the cable but it is very rare that we have two problems at the same time.
"

Yes very rare that 2 boats in different locations would suddenly have the same accident affecting vital communications undersea cables.

now

Lets go to the south of France where this is reported 3 days ago
https://www.brusselstimes.com/311704/fibre-optic-cable-sabotage-causes-global-internet-slowdown

and here again the mystery deepens because "In the early hours of 18 October, a cable was cut at a major landing point for several undersea internet cables, causing a chain reaction of connectivity problems across Europe and further afield. Connectivity was especially disrupted on internet cable between Marseille-Lyon, Marseille-Milan, and Marseille-Barcelona.

According to Zscaler CEO Jay Chaudhry, the vandalism caused connectivity problems across the world. “We are aware of a major cable cut in the South of France that has impacted major subsea cables with connectivity to Asia, Europe, US, and potentially other parts of the world… Customers may see packet loss and or latency for websites and applications which traverse these impacted paths,” Chaudhry told CNN.
"

going back in time a little to early January-- Jan 6 of 2022, this year off the waters of Norway! https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/s...man-activity-behind-svalbard-cable-disruption

In which some unknown human activity results in the Svalbard Cable being cut. Who cares we wonder? It's a remote, really remote Arctic Island chain deep in the Arctic Circle off the coast of Norway.

Well actually this article mentions a 2021 cable cutting that affected various submarine observation posts and keeps track of subs going in and out of the area. And it connects some of the dots-- I've bolded the important bits below.

https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/nord-stream-pipeline-sabotage-mirrors-svalbard-cable-incident.

"From cables to pipelines
The sabotage of the two pipelines is not the only incident during which critical subsea infrastructure was damaged.

At the beginning of 2022 a Norwegian communications fiber optics cable, the most northerly cable of its kind in the world, connecting the Svalbard Satellite Station with more than 100 satellite antennas to the mainland, was cut.

The station is of crucial importance as it is one of only two in the world which can communicate with satellites in polar orbits. The Svalbard Undersea Cable System runs for more than 1,300km between Longyearbyen and Andøya in northern Norway.

A few months earlier, in 2021, cables part of the Lofoten-Vesterålen (LoVe) Ocean Observatory, a network of undersea sensors, were also cut, raising concerns about deliberate sabotage.

Aside from scientific applications, such as the monitoring of emissions and fish stocks, the network is also used to collect data on passing submarines, including those of Russia’s Northern Fleet coming out of or entering the Arctic.

As part of the incident several nodes – research platforms – had been moved and the cables connecting them were either damaged or missing.

For now, some security experts say, it is too early to draw connections between this week’s pipeline sabotage and the earlier cable incidents, but as more information becomes known this may change.

“I am afraid that we do not have enough data and facts on the table to say anything for sure. But it is a good question and if it is confirmed that it was Russia then it would be possible to draw some similarities. We need to wait however to see what the preliminary findings are,” cautions Katarzyna Zysk, Professor of international relations and contemporary history at the Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies (IFS).

However, normally subsea infrastructure very rarely gets damaged naturally. Thus the fact that these normally rare events occurred within a relatively short time span raises questions in itself.

“While there are multiple plausible explanations, these types of events are quite rare.
To see a cluster of human-caused damages to subsurface critical infrastructure of NATO allies certainly raises questions,” concluded Pincus."

YES INDEED IT DOES!

and of course I followed up on the 2021 incident as reported here in the link from the article above. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo...lance-network-had-its-cables-mysteriously-cut where we can read more about what that means.

And not surprisingly that goes back to a time before that when one of the Northern fleet of Russia's subs had a terrible fire. The Losharik incident. as reported by the New York Times here: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/20/world/europe/russian-submarine-fire-losharik.html from April 20, 2020 Updated April 21, 2020

I remember this because we had a thread on it in the Gog Magog section, and it was fascinating hearing the tidbits that leaked out of Russia because this was a new class of subs that Russia was heavily investing in, with the capability of

DEEP SEA DIVES and missions that potentially could cut UNDERWATER CABLES and of course pipelines or anything else they wanted to interfere with.

as the Times points out here:
"The only thing more mysterious than what exactly went wrong that day is what the sub was doing in a thousand feet of water just 60 nautical miles east of Norway in the first place.

The extraordinary incident may offer yet another clue to Russia’s military ambitions in the deep sea, and how they figure into a plan to leverage Arctic naval power to achieve its strategic goals around the globe — including the ability to choke off vital international communication channels at will.

Moscow has been unforthcoming about the Losharik disaster, and insists that the sub was merely a research vessel. The Norwegian military, whose observation posts, navy and surveillance aircraft track Russia’s Northern Fleet for NATO, refuses to say what it may have seen. The only civilian witnesses to the rescue that followed the fire may have been a ragtag band of Russians fishing illegally in the area.

But it was clearly a mission of the highest sensitivity, and the roster of the dead included some of the most decorated and experienced officers of the Russian submarine corps.

To understand why these men may have found themselves on a submarine that can dive to perhaps 20,000 feet — more than 10 times deeper than crewed American subs are believed to operate — consider what crisscrosses the floor of the North Atlantic: endless miles of fiber-optic cables that carry a large fraction of the world’s internet traffic, including trillions of dollars in financial transactions. There are also cables linking the sonar listening devices that litter the ocean floor.

Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin, and his commanders have increasingly stressed the importance of controlling the flow of information to keep the upper hand in a conflict
, said Katarzyna Zysk, head of the Center for Security Policy at the Norwegian Institute for Defense Studies in Oslo.

No matter where in the world a conflict might be brewing, cutting those undersea cables, Professor Zysk said, might force an adversary to think twice before risking an escalation of the dispute.

The Russian understanding is that the level of unacceptable damage is much lower in Europe and the West than during the Cold War,” she said. “So you might not have to do too much.

Not just any submarine can do that — at least, not across nearly the entire expanse of the sea bottom.


But the Losharik is not just any submarine.
"

It goes on to explain a bit about why it can dive and work so deep.

I could say more but I think these coincidences speak for themselves.
 

athenasius

Well-Known Member
Here is a bit more from the NYT article above:

"A 2017 report by Policy Exchange, a research and educational institute in the United Kingdom, found that seabed cables carry 97 percent of the data in communications globally, including roughly $10 trillion in financial transactions a day. The cables are largely unprotected and easy to find. As recently as a few years ago, American military and intelligence officials reported that Russian submarines had often been operating near them.

Because the internet can reroute data when cables are damaged, Western analysts have often dismissed the dangers of sabotage. But considering the vital role of data in Western institutions of all kinds, Professor Zysk said, simply applying pressure by degrading the network could be enough.
"

This fits with the Russian military policy that I quoted recently-- to damage the infrastructure of an enemy in order to prevent war from expanding or to stop the enemy from advancing.

The location of all these accidents to undersea vital communication cables some of which connect up to monitor stations that keep an eye on Russian sub activity are (except the French one) in the same general North Sea to Arctic circle zone just west of Russia's deep sea sub port on their northern coast.

It's near or the same area that had a nuclear accident that was quickly covered up but reported in the western media for a brief time even before the submarine accident. I was interested in that one, and again when the submarine accident happened. At that time the media was reporting Russia's increasing interest in the Arctic and their submarine program.

If I can find the old thread I'll put it in here.

Looks like Russia is still busy working on their special interest submarine program to cut cables and possibly pipes.
 

athenasius

Well-Known Member

athenasius

Well-Known Member
So basically I think the Russian program has gone ahead, in spite of the loss of the Losharik which was expected to be repaired and back in service by 2025 in one article.

It was perhaps the proto type. Certainly it shows that Russia has put a lot of it's energy into this program, perhaps at the expense of their other military endeavours in Ukraine.

Judging by the spate of undersea cable cutting they've been busy testing the response times of everyone.

Make no mistake when Russia sees Europe it sees them as NATO and an arm of America. They are at war in Ukraine to protect their land barriers from further NATO incursions.

The pipeline explosions may simply be another form of destabilization of Europe's infrastructure --before winter yet when it matters most just as the bombing of the Ukrainian power grid is also aimed at destabilization.

Cutting of cables may simply be experiments to see how the West responds, with what and how fast. That would be helpful information in any larger conflict.

There have been a lot of hacking attacks on computers the last few years too. That is another form of destabilization.
 

Ghoti Ichthus

Pray so they do not serve alone. Ephesians 6:10-20
Yet more hooks to draw more players in. The second push south in Ezekiel 38-39 has a lot of other countries with Gog.
I don't believe in coincidences. Far, far too much to be anything other than choreographed and orchestrated in the spiritual realm and carried out on Earth by the players, as foretold by God in the Bible. Fortunately, God is in control, and His Word (the Bible) is true and trustworthy. FWIW, with communications between Western hemisphere and Eastern hemisphere, far less information passed by other-than-approved media. Could be a factor in the deception following the Rapture.


12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
Ephesians 6:12, KJV


I am a product of the Cold War. I grew up learning to fear and distrust the USSR. Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD), duck-and-cover, civil defense drills, fallout shelters, Cuban Missile Crisis, wall going up, Eastern Bloc, proxy wars, etc., etc., etc.

I still distrust Russia USSR. No fear, though, because Ezekiel 38-39, what I believe about the Bible, these two chapters specifically, and the end times, and adult Christian faith and understanding :smile


Jesus is coming back soon!
(sorry couldn't make the font any bigger :lol


:bouncies


:thankyou JESUS!!! :thankyou



:pray :pray :amen :amen
 

Footsteps

Well-Known Member
I haven’t had a lot of concern about cable vandalism but lately I have been missing programs that are
important to me such as The View, Paranormal Activities, Ancient Aliens of Peru, and How to Make Big Bucks with Bitcoin. If these issues aren’t addressed soon I’m calling Nancy Pelosi after her shopping network show Looking Your Best on Drag Queen TV.
 

Footsteps

Well-Known Member
Just to tick Putin off, one satellite needs to be
dedicated to constant broadcasting of the
new series “Prophecy for Russia - Straight from
the Bible, an exciting view of Russia’s already
beginning demise and ultimate rotting army
being eaten by buzzards after attacking Israel”. No commercial interruption.
 

Ghoti Ichthus

Pray so they do not serve alone. Ephesians 6:10-20
I am here for the DS9 reference and that of my favourite character too.
DS9 originates in US, so cut cables on the other side of the pond won't affect you getting to watch it.
OTOH, people over there without copies . . . :eek :frown

BTW, Trekkies everywhere thank Canada for William Shatner and Leonard Nemoy :smile

Who is your favorite (favourite) character?
 

MapleLeaf

Well-Known Member
I'm primarily a fan of Next Generation and I've always had a soft spot for Geordi because of his Reading Rainbow connection and for being a bit of an awkward dork. Though Geordi-focused episodes were TOO awkward most of the time. The one where he was injured on a planet and had to work with a stranded, injured Romulan was pretty good, however. I also loved Guinan and I was always sad that she left the show by Season 6. Data is obviously high on the list and I like his friendship with Geordi. Of course, a geek like Geordi would be friends with a robot. LOL

It took me awhile to warm up to DS9 and I've only seen it straight through once as we no longer have Netflix (we have TNG on DVD) but Garek was just such a fascinating character. I don't think I ever really got the true answer on who he really was or where he really stood but he was utterly charming.

Voyager is such a mercurial series. It has some really great episodes and moments and some truly bizarre stinkers. It's bit of a wasted opportunity at times, I think. They traded the interesting Kess for the obvious-sex-eye-candy "Seven" and the over-emphasis on the Borg ruined the show for me. Those organ-hunting, gross aliens were far more interesting because there was that element of pity and understanding to their motivations. The Borg are boring when over-used. This series did have the most interesting and realistic love plot with Tom Paris and Belanna Torres. Their story kept me going to the end.

I haven't seen the original series since I was a kid. We tried watching through it on Netflix years ago but couldn't get through the pilot. And I haven't seen the other series. I am not a true Trekkie though. I like the show but am not obsessed or really know much beyond basic plot.
 

Ghoti Ichthus

Pray so they do not serve alone. Ephesians 6:10-20
I'm primarily a fan of Next Generation and I've always had a soft spot for Geordi because of his Reading Rainbow connection and for being a bit of an awkward dork. Though Geordi-focused episodes were TOO awkward most of the time. The one where he was injured on a planet and had to work with a stranded, injured Romulan was pretty good, however. I also loved Guinan and I was always sad that she left the show by Season 6. Data is obviously high on the list and I like his friendship with Geordi. Of course, a geek like Geordi would be friends with a robot. LOL

It took me awhile to warm up to DS9 and I've only seen it straight through once as we no longer have Netflix (we have TNG on DVD) but Garek was just such a fascinating character. I don't think I ever really got the true answer on who he really was or where he really stood but he was utterly charming.

Voyager is such a mercurial series. It has some really great episodes and moments and some truly bizarre stinkers. It's bit of a wasted opportunity at times, I think. They traded the interesting Kess for the obvious-sex-eye-candy "Seven" and the over-emphasis on the Borg ruined the show for me. Those organ-hunting, gross aliens were far more interesting because there was that element of pity and understanding to their motivations. The Borg are boring when over-used. This series did have the most interesting and realistic love plot with Tom Paris and Belanna Torres. Their story kept me going to the end.

I haven't seen the original series since I was a kid. We tried watching through it on Netflix years ago but couldn't get through the pilot. And I haven't seen the other series. I am not a true Trekkie though. I like the show but am not obsessed or really know much beyond basic plot.

My fav when I was a kid and the original series came out was Spock. I liked Dr McCoy, too, but hated it when they put him in romantic situations because it never really fit/seemed so forced. I really liked Uura, but they didn't have enough of her. For a bridge officer, she was really short-changed on landing parties and exploration (gender-driven because of how stuff was back then . . . there also weren't any women in engineering or security). I didn't like Scottie back then. As an adult, I understand and appreciate a lot more about that character. They did a really good job with T'Pau. Still like the program when I can watch it. Tribbles :smile

Like watching the Enterprise series, but I only get to see the last half because Dad watches Perry Mason that goes through the first half. Interesting to see how things that existed in the series set later in time developed/were explained. And no stupid micro mini skirts for the woman, although T'Pol in this series is obviously being used as eye candy. They could do a LOT with this character, but alas. Just as they could have done so much more with the Tasha Yar character in Next Generation.

I like how the Worf character developed over time going through Next Generation and DS9. Always liked General Martok. They really got it right when they cast those two characters.

Never warmed up to Voyager. Janeway was too forced and so obviously a "we have to have a woman Captain." Maybe if someone else had played the role it would've been better. Ditto Chakotay.

OK, I've gone way too far away from the original intent of the OP, although to be fair, a Star Trek character (Garak) appears there first :lol :threadjack
Maybe need to start a Star Trek thread over in Anything Goes :biggrin

Back to the undersea cut cables. Maybe a couple of humpback whales did it :eek :lol :deadhorse
 
Last edited:

MapleLeaf

Well-Known Member
My fav when I was a kid and the original series came out was Spock. I liked Dr McCoy, too, but hated it when they put him in romantic situations because it never really fit/seemed so forced. I really liked Uura, but they didn't have enough of her. For a bridge officer, she was really short-changed on landing parties and exploration (gender-driven because of how stuff was back then . . . there also weren't any women in engineering or security). I didn't like Scottie back then. As an adult, I understand and appreciate a lot more about that character. They did a really good job with T'Pau. Still like the program when I can watch it. Tribbles :smile

Like watching the Enterprise series, but I only get to see the last half because Dad watches Perry Mason that goes through the first half. Interesting to see how things that existed in the series set later in time developed/were explained. And no stupid micro mini skirts for the woman, although T'Pol in this series is obviously being used as eye candy. They could do a LOT with this character, but alas. Just as they could have done so much more with the Tasha Yar character in Next Generation.

I like how the Worf character developed over time going through Next Generation and DS9. Always liked General Martok. They really got it right when they cast those two characters.

Never warmed up to Voyager. Janeway was too forced and so obviously a "we have to have a woman Captain." Maybe if someone else had played the role it would've been better. Ditto Chakotay.

OK, I've gone way too far away from the original intent of the OP, although to be fair, a Star Trek character (Garak) appears there first :lol :threadjack
Maybe need to start a Star Trek thread over in Anything Goes :biggrin

Back to the undersea cut cables. Maybe a couple of humpback whales did it :eek :lol :deadhorse
I liked Worf but usually am bored by the Klingon-focused episodes. I don't get why that's the culture Trekkies have latched onto. I do like Mr Spock's character. My dad always liked Spock. My dad pretty much is Spock but without the pointy ears and green blood. "Don't let emotions get in the way of logic".

And I agree with one of your previous posts too: I will never trust Russia as a political entity. It's hard not to be biased against it for what had happened to my family there. I mean, Russia is currently taking out all the electrical power stations in Ukraine so I could easily believe they want to make sure they can knock out the west's infrastructure.
 

ItIsFinished!

Blood bought child of the King of kings.
Pretty exciting information.
For those of us in Christ it is just more of the pieces of the puzzle fitting together ever so.
I believe this to be 100% orchestrated with obvious nefarious intentions.
Ephesians 6:12 (as Ghoti Ichthus posted before)
is quite alive and apparent , especially these last days.
What came to my mind reading the articles in the OP as well as others in general , are preparations being made for Ezekiel 38 to come to fruition.
Communication is paramount when it comes to war. Between the pipelines being compromised and these vital communication lines being compromised for nefarious purposes , would be considered an act of war. I say this because I do not believe it was an accident whatsoever.
The stage is being set . Preparations are being made.
The earth is groaning.
The abyss is quite restless.
Before you know it , we'll be gone in the twinkling of an eye...
 

athenasius

Well-Known Member
Pretty exciting information.
For those of us in Christ it is just more of the pieces of the puzzle fitting together ever so.
I believe this to be 100% orchestrated with obvious nefarious intentions.
Ephesians 6:12 (as Ghoti Ichthus posted before)
is quite alive and apparent , especially these last days.
What came to my mind reading the articles in the OP as well as others in general , are preparations being made for Ezekiel 38 to come to fruition.
Communication is paramount when it comes to war. Between the pipelines being compromised and these vital communication lines being compromised for nefarious purposes , would be considered an act of war. I say this because I do not believe it was an accident whatsoever.
The stage is being set . Preparations are being made.
The earth is groaning.
The abyss is quite restless.
Before you know it , we'll be gone in the twinkling of an eye...
AMEN! Scottie I saw you on the rider on the white horse thread, and wow it's good to see you back. Missed you brother!!!
 
Top