NASA Scientist Explains Why The World Won't End In 2012

[Meg]

NASA Scientist Explains Why The World Won't End In 2012 - Forbes

NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory has put together an excellent video featuring scientist Don Yeomans explaining why most of the doomsday scenarios simply won’t come to pass.

It starts, of course, by debunking the myth that the Mayan calendar ends on Dec. 21, 2012. It doesn’t. It then goes on to cover some of the common apocalyptic scenarios being dangled about, including the Earth being struck by a rogue planet, a solar flare destroying Earth, or a magnetic polar shift.

I hope this scientific explanation helps some people sleep better.

[Any Minute]

Now we can all sleep better because NASA has confirmed what we already knew.
While Nasa searches the universe trying to discredit our God who said, "In the begining God created the heaven and the earth", we know that if we're still here we're at least 1007 years away from Revelation 21:1 and II Peter 3:10-12.

I imagine this 2012 garbage is only going to get worse as we get closer to The date.

[WKUHilltopper]

Man has had the ability for centuries to know how the "world will end" and yet life will still exist even at that. All "scientists" have to do is read the Book.

If you put your faith in these "scientists", you deserve sleepless nights...ha!

[OliveOilMom]

My calander ends every year on December 31st, and so far the world hasn't ended. What makes the Mayan's so special?

[mattfivefour]

Come to think of it, the Mayan's couldn't even predict when THEY would end! Apparently it took 'em all by surprise.

[nails in his hands]

WOW,,, Good news,,, I think I will take my wife to Dairy Queen and get a hot fudge sunday,,, I dont put much weight in what man says ,,,Well if he says its ok to like ice cream well then maybe ,,,, I Love You Jesus,and thank you again

[Carl]

My calander ends every year on December 31st, and so far the world hasn't ended. What makes the Mayan's so special?

The scientist have discovered that the Mayan knowledge of astronomy seems to be as good as theirs in some ways.