SODOMY: The Nature of Antichrist

[Chris]

SODOMY: The Nature of Antichrist

SODOMY: The Nature of Antichrist
By Joseph Chambers

The unclean life of homosexuality and lesbianism has never been as vile or as threatening as it is at this present time. The Bible speaks with clear warnings about this effeminate spirit that will possess the last generation before the Rapture and the judgment of this earth. The accepted lifestyle during the seven years of the Great Tribulation will be homosexuality, lesbianism, sadomasochism, transvestitism, and many other actions that are even viler. Also, the Bible is extremely clear that the nature of the Antichrist and his false prophet (false anointing) will be a sodomy spirit. It would be wrong to prophesy this if it was not evident in the Holy Scripture.

The prophet Daniel was the first to note this characteristic in the future Beast, whom we call the Antichrist. Daniel stated it like this. "And the king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvelous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done. Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all. But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces: and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things" (Daniel 11:36-38). This is a powerful picture of the Antichrist that shows his complete disregard for the normal desire of the opposite sex. Daniel used language that speaks with a clear understanding, "nor the desire of women." The Antichrist and his false prophet will be sodomites of the worst order.

I am never satisfied in Bible study until a truth is confirmed in more than one Scripture. This morning after sitting in a County Commissioner's meeting last evening, where numbers of effeminate individuals spoke, the Holy Spirit gave me that confirmation. John was shown by an angel these facts describing the spirit of the second beast in Revelation chapter thirteen. Here is the Lord's picture to John, "And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon" (Revelation13:11).

This second beast is of the same nature as the first beast (Antichrist) and exercises the same blasphemies and destructive powers. He was seen by John and described as having, "Two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon." That is pictorial language of the highest order. It shows his very strong effeminate and soft nature that is angry, bitter, and loud. A sodomite creature could not be described more adequately. A lamb does not have horns; so, the description is meant to reveal the nature of this beast, not his appearance.

Nothing describes our present world or church more perfectly than an effeminate nature that is literally possessing the multitudes. Women are unhappy when their appearance is patterned like a lady. They have given almost total vent to masculine attire. At the same time that our cultures are changing — women's attire turning masculine — the opposite is occurring with men. Men with earrings and long feminine hair have become the norm. In fact, to think about what I am saying is so out of character with this world that I appear to be stuck in the mud of the past. I admit I am in the past of the Holy Bible. Apostle Paul said by the Holy God, "Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind" (I Corinthians 6:9).

Presently, my city has several pastors that are openly homosexuals or lesbians. Singing groups will usually have at least one (or more) men with long shaggy hair. Do not suggest that this is not a Biblical issue. The great masterpiece of revelation is the Book of Revelation. The Lord showed John a picture of the invasion of unclean spirits on the earth and these dark spirits had hair like women. "And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as the teeth of lions" (Revelation 9:8). If this was not an important picture of the End Times, our God would not have said it. This is much bigger than the long hair on these masculine creatures. It is the spirit behind it. The Bible was exposing the effeminate nature of the end.

Bible believers must be careful facing this challenging time. The word teaches us, "Fret not thyself because of evildoers, neither be thou envious against the workers of iniquity. For they shall soon be cut down like the grass, and wither as the green herb" (Psalm 37:1-2). Again the Spirit said, "Rest in the LORD, and wait patiently for him: fret not thyself because of him who prospereth in his way, because of the man who bringeth wicked devices to pass. Cease from anger, and forsake wrath: fret not thyself in any wise to do evil. For evildoers shall be cut off: but those that wait upon the LORD, they shall inherit the earth" (Psalm 37:7-9).

You will never face a more vile spirit than is manifest in the nature of sodomy. It is invading our world and it is the manifestation of spirits from Satan. These broken lives have been seduced into this state of living by "unclean spirits." There are many persons among them caught up in this confusion that are no different than fornicators or adulterers in the heterosexual sense. These souls are reachable and Christ is perfectly ready to redeem and cleanse them from their sins. It is the radical sodomy community that reveals the final picture of what this uncleanness does to human lives.

As saints of God, we must be open to reach those that are reachable and kind and patient to stand like a rock against this invasion of indecency. It is the nature of Antichrist and will grow like leprosy until the seven years of the Great Tribulation is finished. Be strong and live under the anointing of the Lord's Holy Spirit.

[WazOz]

In Oz we (Christians) are sending Emails to our PM Opposing Gay Marriages
These people that choose this way of life have no idea what they are getting into, an eternal Pit maybe unless they Repent

[MikeD]

This is one point that bothers me about the open "acceptance" of homosexuals in the Military. This "acceptance" is a clear sign to these individuals, how you choose to live your life is "acceptable" to the military. Thus, the individual living this sort of life sees their live as an ok thing and is established in a lifestyle that will only lead to eternal damnation.

[mattfivefour]

I find it interesting that straight men are expected to shower with gay men. So why are female members of the forces not required to shower with males? Oh yes, because the sight of naked females could turn the men on! Well what do you think the sight of naked men does to homosexuals? Let's use some common sense, folks! If I were young and in the military I would not want the thought of my naked body to become some other man's night time fantasy. Gross! And I certainly would not want my children or my grand-children serving in such a environment.

[WazOz]

Re the Military, it is not only the showering "YUK" but when in Service they need to Trust their mates and not be thinking is this Guy or Gal straight, they should only be focussing on being safe and come home safe, as their mates that stand side by side when things get ugly need to be not worried if the guy next to him is Gay, when it is about survival I don't think I would wnat to be worrying who is gay or not, I would need to Trust whoever is fighting by my side.

[Meg]

I find it interesting that straight men are expected to shower with gay men. So why are female members of the forces not required to shower with males? Oh yes, because the sight of naked females could turn the men on! Well what do you think the sight of naked men does to homosexuals? Let's use some common sense, folks! If I were young and in the military I would not want the thought of my naked body to become some other man's night time fantasy. Gross! And I certainly would not want my children or my grand-children serving in such a environment.

Oh Matt, you have to know how homosexual men operate to understand that one. Oh man, you just don't want to know! They're pushing their agenda. Leave it at that, if I said any more, I'd have to get into obscenity I don't care to try to describe. Put it this way, my gay late best friend... We had some conversations... Never mind. But this thing isn't good, not at all.

[mattfivefour]

Oh, I am aware, sis. The two guys (my best man and the acting father of the bride) at my first wedding were the gay couple that lived in the basement apartment next to Charlotte and myself. We were not saved and these two (and a few others, male and female) were friends of ours. Trust me, I am very well aware of the homosexual agenda and the gay and lesbian lifestyle.

[Meg]

I knew you weren't completely out of touch

No, what i was trying to figure out was how to describe the problem as it relates to the military issue. I don't care how much they deny it, homosexuals recruit. For some homosexuals, nothing gets their attention like saying you're not interested. Then, getting at the person becomes a challenge or something. I'd heard Bruce describe this, knew someone he pulled it on. They're very persistent, using a combination of friendliness, flattery, etc, trying to get the targeted guy to give in. The woman have been known to pull this sort of thing too, slightly different tactics. Soldiers have enough pressures and problems, and subjecting them to more harassment just isn't right.

[Robert]

When the Marines came up with the slogan "We're looking for a few good men", they did NOT mean The Village People!!!

But in all seriousness: if the men and women serving in the armed forces are expected to serve with all their ability and heart, how can they do so when they have to be concerned that someone who is SUPPOSED to "have their back" is instead fantasizing about it? That is actually putting a soldier in potential mortal danger, and needlessly so. It is one thing in combat for lives to be lost; it's pretty much unavoidable in war. But for it to be done so out of stupidity is wasting lives, and it is a shameful waste that a life would be lost because the soldier could not depend upon his comrades for fear of being perceived as a potential sexual conquest rather than a brother in arms.

The basis of any military unit is the ability to operate as one, move as one, and fight as one. They cannot do that when they have to be concerned that one or more members are lusting after them, and they cannot trust them. Lusting after a person is to reduce them to a piece of meat, and to dehumanize them; it is relegating them to the status of a commodity to be used and discarded of, not a person or friend. It is a severe form of selfishness as it exists to slake the thirst of the one who is wanting, without any regard for the welfare of the one lusted after.

In short: when all that exists is a lusting for someone's body, the one lusting could do anything to have that person, even if it includes something that could potentially put that person in danger, knowingly or not. And in the military, all it takes is one wrong move to put an entire unit in danger or even blow an entire operation.

I'm sorry to sound hard-hearted and even off-kilter here, but we're talking the safety and well-being of combat troops here, they have enough to face in combat: this is NOT something that should be added to that list as well. They serve to protect and defend us, and this is how they are thanked?

Talk about NERVE.

[Meg]

Lusting after a person is to reduce them to a piece of meat, and to dehumanize them; it is relegating them to the status of a commodity to be used and discarded of, not a person or friend. It is a severe form of selfishness as it exists to slake the thirst of the one who is wanting, without any regard for the welfare of the one lusted after.

May I stash this in my files for future quoting as necessary? This is exactly what i have been trying to explain about what is wrong with sexual immorality. In fact, it might be beneficial if I use this statement you worded so well as the basis for an essay about how these very issues harmed me, killed my best friend, and contributed to the suicide of another friend's husband etc ad nauseum.

"Freedom" of sexual expression was one of the devastating and deadly horrors inflicted on society at large in the 20th century, and nobody seems willing to admit it!

Does anyone else recognize the sheer obscenity of women in combat?

Many weep for the aborted children, but who will care for the children born?

I've been known to ask the most devastating question of all, at what age does the child become expendable? Because when we are judged by our physical attributes or by our material assets, when one falls short of the ideal, he or she has just been written off as expendable...

[Navyblue]

Many Hetero-sexual people will not enlist, in the fear of loss of being able to trust those your life is depending upon. More Homo-sexuals will, I believe, enlist, to enjoy the close, physical, lifestyle of the Military. I have no idea if the danger of being killed will increase (likely), or decrease (unlikely). The Military I served in has basically gone to the grave ahead of some of us, who lived that life.

Thought: Now that Homosexuality is not restricted in the Military, What happens in the near future, when a person is taken prisoner, especially by radical Islamist Jehadists?? If the prisoner is suspected of being homosexual, mightn't they be put to death, just for general-purpose-insurance that the 'Homo' does not escape Allah's justice?? A lot of good people may well die, who might not have. Just a thought.

What PBHO has done to this, and other factors of our society, in these two short years, sickens me. My age, and my beliefs, dictate my desire to go Home, just as soon as He calls me. AMEN

In Messiah. I keep the Watch.

Arley

[Jumpmaster]

B]SODOMY: The Nature of Antichrist[/B]
By Joseph Chambers

The unclean life of homosexuality and lesbianism has never been as vile or as threatening as it is at this present time. The Bible speaks with clear warnings about this effeminate spirit that will possess the last generation before the Rapture and the judgment of this earth. The accepted lifestyle during the seven years of the Great Tribulation will be homosexuality, lesbianism, sadomasochism, transvestitism, and many other actions that are even viler. Also, the Bible is extremely clear that the nature of the Antichrist and his false prophet (false anointing) will be a sodomy spirit. It would be wrong to prophesy this if it was not evident in the Holy Scripture.

The prophet Daniel was the first to note this characteristic in the future Beast, whom we call the Antichrist. Daniel stated it like this. "And the king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvelous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done. Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all. But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces: and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things" (Daniel 11:36-38). This is a powerful picture of the Antichrist that shows his complete disregard for the normal desire of the opposite sex. Daniel used language that speaks with a clear understanding, "nor the desire of women." The Antichrist and his false prophet will be sodomites of the worst order.

This is the traditional teaching of the Church of God, in which Joseph was a pastor for many years. It is, I suppose, a teaching of much of evangelical Christianity.

But what does the Scripture say exactly?

"Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god..."

The a/c will not regard the desire of women.

Does this mean he will be a sodomite? Nowhere else in the Bible does it give another clue along this line.

Is there another interpretation?

I believe there is.

What is the "desire of women"?

I believe it's to be treated with respect, to find Prince Charming, marry him, have children and live happily ever after. Basically that's it. If she is a Christian, to save herself for her husband and serve the Lord all her life.

Can we see an example of a world leader that would meet this criteria of not regarding women properly and abusing them?

Our own Bill Clinton would be an example of this kind of leader. He was impeached for lying about his testimony in a court of law concerning abusing Paula Jones. He admitted he abused her and paid a large sum of money in settlement to her.

He abused Monica Lewinsky and should have gone to prison for child abuse. He abused Cathline Wiley by groping her even in her time of tragedy and then there was Genifer Flowers. His reputation among his staff was such that they called these incidents "Bimbo eruptions".

The a/c will not "regard the desire of women". It is clear that his narcissistic actions will set him apart from other world leaders and this is one clue that should easily be seen by the discerning watchman.

Jumpmaster