Obama/Soetoro's Social Security Number

[Sean Osborne]

An intensive investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social Security number (SSN) is being used by President Obama: Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (Obama's current SSN) on or about March 1977.

Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut. Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved for Connecticut residents.

Obama never lived or worked in that state! Therefore, there is no reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042. None whatsoever!

Now comes the best part! Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died.

Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.

The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig's death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to stop
and therefore, no questions were ever raised.

The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya or became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro simply scoured the probate records until she found someone who died who was not receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr Ludwig's Connecticut SSN for Obama.

Just wait until Trump gets past the birth certificate and onto the issue of Barry O's use of a stolen SSN. You will see leftist heads exploding, because they will have no way of defending Obama. Although many Americans do not understand the meaning of the term "natural born" there are few who do not understand that if you are using someone else's SSN it is a clear indication of FRAUD!

[WKUHilltopper]

This guy is a vapor.

[FaithInChrist]

This is very damning evidence against Obama. I just wonder how something like this hasn't been discovered already. Most people understand that your SS# holds geographical information. How many people have seen Obama's SS# and simply ignored this well known fact.

I wonder how Obama's SS# get out to the public in the first place. hmmm.

If this is indeed true then Obama's grandma isn't as smart as she thinks she is.

I wonder who is going to be the Democratic contender next year?

[readyforhome]

I've heard mention of this before and every time anyone has ever brought any of this up, well the race card is pulled out. "You're racist." Well voting
for someone JUST because of their race is just as racist as NOT voting for someone JUST because of their race. For that matter are we really more
than one race? Aren't we all just members of the human race? I don't remember any distinctions about this in the Bible, though in the Bible as my
mom pointed out there were in the Old Testament just Jews and Gentiles, after the New Testament there are now Jews, Gentiles, and Christians.
Actually even science proves that we are all one race with a few minor variations. Nice to see they finally caught up.

If he wasn't a valid candidte he NEVER should have been allowed to run, much less become the president. What can I say, money talks. Even with
glaring evidence most people are just going to ignore it, and continue to push that people who push the issue are just racist. I would like to think he
is a valid candidate, but with the way he blatantly hates the U.S. and continues his push to fundamentaly change (destroy) everything about it, well its hard to see an American citizen.

One final thing, as far as I know one has to be a natural born citizen, NOT just a natualized one in order to be President. There IS a difference. I say this because I've heard the argument that he's a naturalized citzen and that is enough... If he is in fact just a naturalized citizen he was never a valid Presidential candidate.

[WKUHilltopper]

This is very damning evidence against Obama. I just wonder how something like this hasn't been discovered already. Most people understand that your SS# holds geographical information. How many people have seen Obama's SS# and simply ignored this well known fact.

I wonder how Obama's SS# get out to the public in the first place. hmmm.

If this is indeed true then Obama's grandma isn't as smart as she thinks she is.

I wonder who is going to be the Democratic contender next year?

That's just one of the social security numbers that have been associated with him. Apparently he has a drawer full of social security cards. Most criminals do.

[micah719]

Even if we ignore his clear disqualification to be in the position, surely his dismal record since he got there is more than enough to impeach him as a treasonous traitor, immediately. Why is there a bubble of unaccountability around the elite rulers?

[A24AW]

What someone needs to research is:
1) Is this indeed his ssn?
2) If this is his ssn, was there a mistake in issuing the number? I know, far fetched-CT prefix issued in HI (FYI- CT prefixes are 040-049)
3) Did Barry have to be an Indonesian citizen in order to go to public school in Jakarta? (He did NOT go to a madrasah school like some people in the media want to make us believe.) He could have maintained his US citizenship and went to public school because he lived in country. We do it here all the time with legal and illegal aliens.
4) If he had a birth certificate from HI, applying for a ssn was nothing. Why would there be a need for fraud. -I know this IS the question.
5) Did his grandmother truly have access to documents to pull this ssn?
6) Why March 1977? Barry would have been a sophmore in high school. Probably trying to apply for jobs.

[Sean Osborne]

What someone needs to research is:
1) Is this indeed his ssn?
2) If this is his ssn, was there a mistake in issuing the number? I know, far fetched-CT prefix issued in HI (FYI- CT prefixes are 040-049)
3) Did Barry have to be an Indonesian citizen in order to go to public school in Jakarta? (He did NOT go to a madrasah school like some people in the media want to make us believe.) He could have maintained his US citizenship and went to public school because he lived in country. We do it here all the time with legal and illegal aliens.
4) If he had a birth certificate from HI, applying for a ssn was nothing. Why would there be a need for fraud. -I know this IS the question.
5) Did his grandmother truly have access to documents to pull this ssn?
6) Why March 1977? Barry would have been a sophmore in high school. Probably trying to apply for jobs.

A24AW,

Hopefully the following research will answer some the the questions you pose above. Why this was not on the front page and the lead story of every news organization is beyond me.

E-Verify on Obama yields SSN mismatch notice

BY LINDA BENTLEY | SEPTEMBER 14, 2011

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. files motion for reconsideration in SSA challenge

WASHINGTON – On Sept. 8, in her relentless pursuit to uncover the truth behind President Barack Obama’s fraudulent use of a Connecticut-issued Social Security number (SSN), Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (r) filed a motion for reconsideration in her Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) challenge against Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, who was granted summary judgment on Aug. 30 by U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth.

In his memorandum opinion granting summary judgment in favor of Astrue, Lamberth wrote, “Ever persistent, plaintiff has once again come before this court in an effort to uncover ‘the biggest cover up in the history of this nation … She believes that the president is using a ‘fraudulently obtained’ Social Security number and that the Social Security Administration – among other agencies – is involved in a scheme to ‘cover up social security fraud, IRS fraud, election fraud and possibly treason’ committed by the President … As her numerous filings with the court demonstrate, plaintiff will stop at nothing to get to the bottom of this alleged conspiracy.”

Lamberth went on to say, “Unfortunately for plaintiff, today is not her lucky day.”

In her motion for reconsideration, Taitz stated there is newly discovered information and, based on an assertion of clear error and manifest injustice, requested an emergency hearing and oral argument on the merits within 20 days.

Taitz said she learned from Private Investigator Doug Hagmann, (my dear friend and colleague at the Northeast Intelligence Network) while she was appearing on his radio show, when Obama originally posted his tax returns on WhiteHouse.gov, he left his full Social Security number on one of the pages and it was the same Connecticut-issued Social Security number (042-68-4425) as noted in the sworn affidavits of three other private investigators Neil Sankey, Susan Daniels and John Sampson.

According to Taitz, once Obama’s unredacted SSN was posted on the White House’s website, it then became a public record.



Taitz also provided as an exhibit with her motion an affidavit from Linda Jordan, a Seattle resident, who attested to entering Obama’s name, birth date and the same SSN into the government’s E-Verify program, used for verifying employment eligibility.

Entering Obama’s information resulted in the production of a “Notice of Mismatch with Social Security Administration (SSA) Records,” instructing the employee (Obama) to “Bring this notice with you when you visit SSA.”

The reason checked for issuing the notice stated, “SSA record does not verify, Other reason, SSA found a discrepancy in the record.”

Previously, when Obama’s SSN was entered into the SSA database for verification by another, it too returned as “failed,” stating the number was never issued.

According to Daniels and others’ research, the earliest the Connecticut number ever appeared associated with Obama was in 1986, with the exception of it appearing on his fraudulently created Selective Service System registration, which was apparently created in 2008 to appear as if it were filed in 1980.

While motions for reconsideration are generally disfavored, Section 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure state they may be granted where a party presents new evidence not reasonably available prior to the judgment, or where it is shown that the prior ruling was clearly erroneous or manifestly unjust.

Taitz presented both newly discovered evidence and argues clear error and manifest injustice in granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

In his memorandum opinion, Lamberth also concluded Taitz “identified no legitimate public interest that would be served by disclosure of the requested Form SS-5” (Application for Social Security Number).

Lamberth stated, “In determining whether the disclosure of government records would result in a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy, the relevant public interest to be weighed against the privacy interest is the extent to which disclosure would contribute to ‘public understanding of the operations or activities of the government.’”

According to Lamberth, Taitz’s “vehement allegations of fraud consist of mere ‘bare suspicion[s]’ and thus fail to satisfy the public interest standard required under FOIA.”

There is more than ample evidence Obama is using a SSN that was not assigned to him, has a fraudulently created Selective Service System registration and produced a long-form Certificate of Live Birth that has been determined by numerous experts, including Doug Vogt and Paul Irey, to be a blatant forgery.

These facts alone, which seem to establish Obama is usurping the office of President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the military, should be more than enough to satisfy the public interest standard required under FOIA to compel the SSA to produce a copy of Obama’s Form SS-5.

[A24AW]

Thanks for the additional research, Sean. I will forward this on for answers to questions others have.

[GlennO]

Gotta love this!

[BuzzardHut]

Who is this masked man?




http://obamacrimes.com/?p=1610

Mr. Berg continues, “I am repeatedly contacted about Obama’s use of Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 and the word on the Internet that the number in use by Obama was originally assigned to Jean Paul Ludwig born in 1890 in France, who is now deceased. All over the Internet there are articles and posts that Obama stole Mr. Ludwig’s Social Security number and Obama is using Mr. Ludwig’s Social Security number fraudulently. There are also posts all over the Internet that Obama is using a deceased person’s Social Security number. This is NOT true. Mr. Berg continues, “when false information is put out on the Internet and filed in our Court’s, it takes away from the factual issue that Obama is not Constitutionally Eligible to be President of the United States. False information regarding the eligibility of Obama makes the question into the lack of Constitutional eligibility of Obama serving as our President a laughing stock.”

The Social Security death index is located on the Web at http://ssdi.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/ssdi.cgi. The Social Security death index has the death records, along with Social Security number, of every person in the United States ever assigned a Social Security number who has died.

A simple search of the name “Jean Paul Ludwig” born in 1890 returns no results. See the print-screen attached hereto. A simple search of Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 returns no results for a death of any individual using that number. A simple search for “Jean Ludwig” returns several deaths, but only one in that name born in 1890, and as can be seen, the Social Security number of this particular Jean Ludwig does not match, nor is it similar to Obama’s Social Security number xxx-xx-4425. See the copy attached hereto:

Berg continued, “Simple searches show that the information pertaining to Obama’s Social Security number being previously assigned and that Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security number is false information and does nothing more than discredit the true questions into Barack Obama a/k/a Barry Soetoro’s Constitutional Eligibility to serve as our President of the United States.”

Questions have also been raised regarding the fact Obama’s Social Security number was issued out of Connecticut instead of Hawaii and that Obama never resided in Connecticut. The state and/or office that issued a Social Security number and/or card is not always the same as where the person the number being assigned to resides.

A brief look at the history of Social Security numbers available through Social Security at http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/firstcard.html shows that the State who issues a Social Security number does not have to be and may not be the state in which the person resides.

The “First” Social Security Number (SSN)

Issued Through Local Post Offices

Since the Social Security Board did not have a network of field offices in late 1936, it contracted with the U.S. Postal Service to distribute and assign the first batch of Social Security numbers through its 45,000 local post offices around the country. Of these 45,000 post offices, 1,074 were also designated as “typing centers” where the cards themselves were prepared. The procedure for issuing the first SSNs were that the SS-4 application forms were to be distributed by the post offices to employers beginning Monday, November 16, 1936. These forms asked the employers to indicate how many employees they had at their place of business. Using the data from the SS-4 forms, the post offices then supplied an SS-5 form for each employee and these forms (on which the assignment of an SSN was based) were to be distributed by the post offices beginning Tuesday, November 24, 1936. The completed SS-5 forms were returned to the post office where an SSN would be assigned and a card typed with the name and SSN. This step could happen on one of several ways. The person could return the card in person and wait while the “typing center” prepared their card, or they could hand the form to their local letter carrier, or they could put it in the mail. Once the SSN was assigned and the card typed, the local letter carrier then returned the card to the place of business as a piece of regular mail. The record of the SSN assignment was sent to Social Security headquarters in Baltimore, Maryland, where the master file of SSNs would be kept.

So the first card was issued, sometime in mid-November, 1936, somewhere in one of 1,074 post offices to someone whose identity and SSN are unknown. In theory, the first card should have been issued on November 24th, but there have been reports of cards showing earlier dates. It is not clear whether the cards with earlier dates were actually issued on that day or whether some post offices predated some of their cards. If the 45,000 local post offices followed their procedures, no cards could have been issued before November 16th, and none should have been issued before November 24th. But here again, there is always the possibility that some local post offices failed to follow their instructions. The best we can say with certainty is that the first SSN was issued sometime in mid-November 1936. In any case, on whatever day the first card was issued, hundreds of thousands of SSNs were probably issued on that same day, so many people had Social Security cards issued on the very first day they became available.

The First Official SSN

Once the SSN records were received in Baltimore they were grouped in blocks of 1,000 and the master records were created. On December 1, 1936 the first block of 1,000 records were assembled and were ready to start their way through the nine-step process that would result in the creation of a permanent master record and the establishment of an earnings record for the individual. When this first stack was ready, Joe Fay, head of the Division of Accounting Operations in the Candler Building, walked over to the stack, pulled off the top record, and declared it to be the official first Social Security record. (This was the first point in the process where there was enough control to designate an official first card–it would have been impossible to try and identify the first card typed in one of the 1,074 typing centers around the country.) This particular record, (055-09-0001) belonged to John D. Sweeney, Jr., age 23, of New Rochelle, New York. The next day, newspapers around the country announced that Sweeney had been issued the first SSN. It would be more accurate to say that the first Social Security record was established for John David Sweeney, but since master records were invisible to the public and the Social Security card was a very visible token of the program, the newspapers overlooked the nuance. And so John David Sweeney, Jr. is the closest thing we have to the first person to have received a Social Security card–although his status is more symbolic than actual.

So now that I have given a bit of history, how in the world could someone be issued a SSN in 1890, when the first batch of social security numbers were NOT issued until 1936? According to the Social Security death index, the majority of the SSN’s issued for Hawaii residence were in fact issued out of CT, see below, there are thousands of records and were issued during the same time period as Obama’s was issued to him, which was in or about 1972-1978.

(V)=(Verified) Report verified with a family member or someone acting on behalf of a family member. (P)=(Proof) Death Certificate Observed.

You can now order the SS-5 Form for deceased individuals directly from the Social Security Administration online at https://secure.ssa.gov/apps9/eFOIA-F...ernet/main.jsp.

Information from http://www.socialsecurity.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html

The Social Security number is a nine-digit number in the format “AAA-GG-SSSS”. The number is divided into three parts. The Area Number, the first three digits, is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1973, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the office code in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be in the area where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1973, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant’s mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, neither prior to 1973, nor since.

Generally, numbers were assigned beginning in the northeast and moving south and westward, so that people on the east coast had the lowest numbers and those on the west coast had the highest numbers. As the areas assigned to a locality are exhausted, new areas from the pool are assigned, so some states have noncontiguous groups of numbers.\

Complete list of area number groups from the Social Security Administration

The middle two digits are the group number. The group numbers range from 01 to 99. However, they are not assigned in consecutive order. For administrative reasons, group numbers are issued in the following order: 1.ODD numbers from 01 through 09 2.EVEN numbers from 10 through 98 3.EVEN numbers from 02 through 08 4.ODD numbers from 11 through 99

As an example, group number 98 will be issued before 11. •The last four digits are serial numbers. They represent a straight numerical sequence of digits from 0001-9999 within the group.

Berg continued, “Soetoro/Obama’s social security number was NOT stolen from an individual born in 1890 who is now dead. Attached is a screen shot from the social security death index, running Soetoro/Obama’s social security number. If in fact, Obama was using a stolen number from a man born in 1890, who died, it would be showing in the Social Security Death Index. As you can see from the attached picture, no death’s are returned using Obama’s number. Anyone can check the Social Security Death Index (SSDI) by going to http://ssdi.rootsweb.ancestry.com/.

Berg continued, “The Social Security office in the state of Maryland issues Social Security numbers and cards for people residing all over the United States. Just like in the 70′s, local Social Security offices were and continue to be back-logged, thus Maryland issues the numbers and cards as do other less busy Social Security offices. The state that issued the SSN number and card is not always and does not mean the person had to reside in that state.

Berg continued, “The Birth Certificate issued by Obama on national Television, is believed to be a forgery – it is NOT a long form Birth Certificate. Even if Obama could produce a long form Birth Certificate, which is highly doubted, it fails to answer the questions into Obama’s adoption and/or birth acknowledgment in Indonesia.”

Berg said, “I have received many calls claiming Obama could not have lost his U.S. citizenship by his mother’s acts of expatriation. In part this is true, however, the Nationality Act of 1940, revised 1952, Section 318(a) states, “A former citizen of the United States expatriated through the expatriation of such person’s parent or parents and who has not acquired the nationality of another country by any affirmative act other than the expatriation of his parent or parents may be naturalized upon filing a petition for naturalization before reaching age of Twenty-Five [25] years and upon compliance with all requirements of the naturalization laws with the following exceptions: (b) No former citizen of the United States, expatriated through the expatriation of such person’s parent or parents shall be obliged to comply with the requirements of the immigration laws, if he has not acquired the nationality of another country by any affirmative act other than the expatriation of his parent or parents, and if he has come or shall come to the United States before reaching the age of Twenty-Five [25] years. (c) After his naturalization such person shall have the same citizenship status as if he had not been expatriated.”

Berg continues, “Renewing an Indonesian Passport after the age of 18 is an affirmative act, as you are swearing allegiance to another Country. Soetoro/Obama renewed his Indonesian Passport when he traveled to Pakistan, which is why he had to stop in Indonesia first. Remember, in 1981, Dunham was divorcing Soetoro in Hawaii and was not in Indonesia. Obama/Soetoro admits to traveling to Indonesia first and then onto Pakistan. Soetoro/Obama claims in his book “Dreams From My Father” that he stopped in Indonesia to visit his mother. But again, his mother was not in Indonesia, she was in Hawaii with Maya, divorcing Lolo Soetoro. In addition, the State Department has stated in response to a FOIA [Freedom of Information] request that they do not have a U.S. Passport application on file for Barack H. Obama.”

Berg said, “Despite the above however, Indonesia required Obama/Soetoro to do a bit more upon his 18th birthday. In fact the Indonesian law gives until the age of Twenty-One [21]. Soetoro/Obama would have had to sign an Affidavit relinquishing his Indonesian citizenship and said Affidavit had to be sent to the Indonesian Government before reclaiming any U.S. citizenship he may have once held.

When it comes to the citizenship of individuals in other countries, we are prevented from interfering, Hague Convention 1930. During the late 60′s all the way up until 2006 Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship. In 2006, Indonesia changed their laws to permit dual citizenship; however, Indonesia has had its battles with enforcing their new law permitting dual citizenship.

From the legal research we have done, it appears that Barry Soetoro [a/k/a Barack Obama] became an Indonesian citizen. When Soetoro/Obama was approximately four [4] years old his parents divorced and thereafter, Soetoro/Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia. Evidence points to the fact that Lolo Soetoro either signed a government form legally ‘acknowledging’ Soetoro/Obama as his son or ‘adopted’ Soetoro, either of which changed any citizenship status Soetoro/Obama had to a “natural” citizen of Indonesia.

At the time Barry Soetoro was in Indonesia, all Indonesian students were required to carry government identity cards or Karty Tanda Pendudaks, as well as family card identification called a Kartu Keluarga. The Kartu Keluarga is a family card which bears the legal names and citizenship status of all family members.

Soetoro/Obama was registered in a public school as an Indonesian citizen by the name of Barry Soetoro and his father was listed as Lolo Soetoro, M.A according to the Indonesian school records. Indonesia did not allow foreign students to attend their public schools in the late 1960’s or 1970’s, and any time a child was registered for a public school, the child’s name and citizenship status were verified through the Indonesian Government. See Constitution of Republic of Indonesia (Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945), Chapter 13, Law No. 62 of 1958 (all citizens of Indonesia have a right to education). There was no way for Soetoro/Obama to have attended school in Jakarta, Indonesia legally unless he was an Indonesian citizen, as Indonesia was under tight rule and was a Police State. See Constitution of Republic of Indonesia (Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945), Law No. 62 of 1958. These facts indicate that Obama/Soetoro is an Indonesian citizen, and therefore he is not eligible to be President of the United States.

Under Indonesian law, when a male acknowledges a child as his son, it deems the son, in this case Soetoro/Obama, an Indonesian State citizen. See Constitution of Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 62 of 1958 concerning Immigration Affairs and Indonesian Civil Code (Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata) (KUHPer) (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie).

Furthermore, under the Indonesian Adoption Law, once an Indonesian citizen adopts a child, the adoption severs the child’s relationship to the birth parents, and the adopted child is given the same status as a natural child and the child takes the name of his step-father, in this case, Soetoro. See Indonesian Constitution, Article 2.

The Indonesian citizenship law was designed to prevent apatride (stateless) or bipatride (dual) citizenship. Indonesian regulations recognized neither apatride nor bipatride (stateless or dual) citizenship. Since Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship; neither did the United States (since the United States only permitted dual citizenship when ‘both’ countries agree); and since Obama/Soetoro was a “natural” citizen of Indonesia, the United States would not step in or interfere with the laws of Indonesia. Hague Convention of 1930.”

As a result of Soetoro/Obama’s Indonesian ‘natural’ citizenship status, Soetoro/Obama could never regain U.S. ‘natural born’ status, if he in fact he ever held such, which we doubt. Soetoro/Obama could have only become ‘naturalized’ if the proper paperwork were filed with the U.S. State Department, after going through U.S. Immigration upon his return to the United States; in which case, Soetoro/Obama would have received a Certification of Citizenship indicating ‘naturalized’.

Berg continued, “Regardless, we have been unable to locate any records indicating that Soetoro/Obama attempted to and/or actually did take the proper steps through the State Department in order to be here in our Country legally”.

Further, there is no evidence that Soetoro/Obama ever ‘legally’ changed his name from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama – therefore his legal name is still ‘Barry Soetoro’.

[A24AW]

Hmm.... Good job Buzzard Hut with the research information. Here are some other questions. Under what name was the SSN issued, Soetoro or Obama? The research does not tell us if there is an application for his SSN on file anywhere. Most records have been microfiched or scan into some database for preservation. Has anyone come across the naturalized paperwork from the US State Dept? What birth certificate was filed with it?

[mattfivefour]

Yes. Good work, Buzz.

[WKUHilltopper]

Why this was not on the front page and the lead story of every news organization is beyond me.

Because the MSM is the propaganda conduit, complicit in treason, for those conducting this coup d tat. I know you know this, I just like publicly stating it so I'll get my name on more 'government lists'. It's like padding my resume.

[A24AW]

Because the MSM is the propaganda conduit, complicit in treason, for those conducting this coup d tat. I know you know this, I just like publicly stating it so I'll get my name on more 'government lists'. It's like padding my resume.

[Sean Osborne]

Hmm.... Good job Buzzard Hut with the research information. Here are some other questions. Under what name was the SSN issued, Soetoro or Obama? The research does not tell us if there is an application for his SSN on file anywhere. Most records have been microfiched or scan into some database for preservation. Has anyone come across the naturalized paperwork from the US State Dept? What birth certificate was filed with it?

The research Buzz has posted is that of Philip J. Berg, Esq., and his friends. Philip Berg is a far left Democrat Party apparatchik lawyer and extremely bitter Hillary Rodham Clintoon supporter from the Democrat primary season of 2008. His political agenda and abject hatred of Obama has always and since then been very narrowly focused, even though his beloved Hillary caved in and copped a deal with Obama (made a deal with a devil in other words) that netted her the coveted political status she desired in the Office of the United States Secretary of State.

Berg's so-called "research" is not as he would have people believe, the bulk of it is a journeyman's exercise in disinformation instead of a legal expert exercising due diligence. His equally abject hatred of Republicans, Conservatives, Christians and, especially, California attorney-at-law Orly Taitz causes him to dismiss the aforesaid with merely a wave of his hand, and not much else of real substance.

Philip J. Berg, Esquire's statements regarding Obama's faux SSN are un-true, his research shoddy and his conclusions ill-informed at best. The agency of which I have been the Associate Director of since 2004, has been actively investigating all aspects of the enigma that is Barack Hussein Obama II/Barry Soetoro since his national political star began to rise. In the words of Director Doug Hagmann on this Obama SSN issue:

Beyond the digital release of the Certificate of Live Birth, however, lies yet another aspect of his background that suggests the duplicitous use of his social security number. Lest anyone is about to accuse me or my network of being late to the party, we have been investigating this aspect of the background of the man seated in the Oval Office for some time. Much like Ohio private investigator Susan Daniels, investigator Neil Sankey and others have found, irregularities exist with the issuance of Barack Hussein Obama’s social security number. We have collected original proprietary database reports and other documents that indicate that Obama obtained, under possible fraudulent circumstances, an invalid social security number. While much discussion involves the state of issuance of that number, our investigation focuses on the circumstances surrounding that issuance.

Indeed, what he have here with specific respect to this 'Obama the fraud' issue is a broken kaleidoscope. There are powers and players who have left virtual “fingerprints” on the deliberately miscalibrated mirrors. Illustrating this cannot be done in just one post, so I will post this information one piece at a time. But first let me be clear on something. The moniker "the chosen one" often applied to Obama/Soetoro is spot-on accurate. He was deliberately chosen, and that is where this subject must begin.

Obama's meteoric rise to power was well planned

To understand how a virtually unknown politician from Illinois could rise to occupy the most powerful position in the free world in less than a decade after he became a state senator, one must take a few steps backward to understand the complete picture, and that Obama was selected long before he was elected to become president. Problems with his background were numerous, however, including but not limited to his parental lineage and place of birth. These problems became apparent through a private vetting process by his own handlers, or those who are known as the “power elite” in the latter half of the last century. His handlers were and are globalists of the highest order, extending from George Soros to those above him on the proverbial pyramid capstone of globalists.

The globalists had direct and indirect ties to the Dunham family and in particular, Obama’s mother. Consider, for example, that Peter F. Geithner (father of Obama’s Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner), worked for the Ford Foundation and oversaw the work of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, while she was developing “microfinance programs” in Indonesia. In brief, Obama’s other set up a large loan system in Indonesia akin to the savings and loan structure of the 1970′s and 1980′s. To gain a better understanding of her activities in finance, despite her background in anthropology, recall the BCCI scandal of the late 1970′s. In fact, some of the same “players” who existed then continue to exist in Obama’s circles.

Our investigation into her activities and those close to Obama are continuing and will be the subject of a separate article, including how Obama as president fits into the communist China agenda in terms of global finance. Meanwhile, it’s important to take a few more steps backward in history to understand that the scrubbing of inconvenient records is not new.

More to come...

[A24AW]

"...Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, while she was developing “microfinance programs” in Indonesia." Hmmm. Not sure about this information. What about being employed as a local hire with the American Embassy?

[Sean Osborne]

"...Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, while she was developing “microfinance programs” in Indonesia." Hmmm. Not sure about this information.

These are established facts and come directly from several open sources of information, to include:

1.) The University of Hawai'i.
2.) The Anthropology News periodical, and from Ann Dunham-Soetoro's personal recollections while she was in Indonesia, and while working as a consultant for the United States Agency for International Development.
3.) As published in December 2008 by Alice Dewey and Geoffrey White ("Ann Dunham: A Personal Reflection").

Towards the end of her life she worked with Bank Rakyat Indonesia, where she helped apply her research to the largest microfinance program in the world. At this time young Barry Soetoro was a citizen of Indonesia.

This factual information is all open source, and while part of the over-all picture I alluded to in an earlier post, is not something I desire to spend my time digging up again at this time. I have decided that I will only re-visit this issue if it comes up again during the upcoming election because there are far more important issues at hand.

[WKUHilltopper]

2.) The Anthropology News periodical, and from Ann Dunham-Soetoro's personal recollections

She'll apparently like to be photoed in the raw as well...but I'll let you all google that rather than post it here.

[A24AW]

These are established facts and come directly from several open sources of information, to include:

1.) The University of Hawai'i.
2.) The Anthropology News periodical, and from Ann Dunham-Soetoro's personal recollections while she was in Indonesia, and while working as a consultant for the United States Agency for International Development.
3.) As published in December 2008 by Alice Dewey and Geoffrey White ("Ann Dunham: A Personal Reflection").

Towards the end of her life she worked with Bank Rakyat Indonesia, where she helped apply her research to the largest microfinance program in the world. At this time young Barry Soetoro was a citizen of Indonesia.

This factual information is all open source, and while part of the over-all picture I alluded to in an earlier post, is not something I desire to spend my time digging up again at this time. I have decided that I will only re-visit this issue if it comes up again during the upcoming election because there are far more important issues at hand.

Something is not right with this story.