Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Netanyahu: Israel not obligated by NPT resolution

  1. #1
    Chris's Avatar
    Chris is online now Administrator
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Pensacola, Florida
    Posts
    29,027

    Default Netanyahu: Israel not obligated by NPT resolution

    Netanyahu: Israel not obligated by NPT resolution
    Prime minister's office dismisses international call for Middle East nuclear talks as 'deeply flawed and hypocritical'.
    By Barak Ravid and Haaretz Service

    Israel has no obligation to act on a resolution passed at a UN conference on Friday that singled out Israel over non-proliferation, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said on Saturday. At the conclusion of a month-long conference in New York, the 189 signatories of the international nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT) called for an international conference in 2012 with the aim of establishing a nuclear-weapon-free Middle East. "As a non-signatory state of the NPT, Israel is not obligated by the decisions of this Conference, which has no authority over Israel," the prime minister's office said in a statement. "Given the distorted nature of this resolution, Israel will not be able to take part in its implementation."
    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

    Israel, which operates a policy of 'nuclear ambiguity' but is widely believed to have an arsenal of atomic warheads, has not signed the NPT and is not required by international law to comply with the conference's resolutions. The resolution also called on Israel, along with two other non-signatories, India and Pakistan, to join the treaty.

    more..................Netanyahu: Israel not obligated by NPT resolution - Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News

  2. #2
    Robert is offline .
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    -
    Posts
    7,595

    Default Re: Netanyahu: Israel not obligated by NPT resolution

    To me, it seems like "international law" is whatever the UN council needs it to be at that particular moment, changing to suit their whims. To them, it doesn't matter if Israel signed the NPT or not; they want to "achieve peace' by any means necessary, and if it means Israel needs to go away, then they will try to disarm her and leave her to die at the hands of Islam.


    Too bad for them God has other plans, and they DON'T involve the UN's input.

  3. #3
    Chris's Avatar
    Chris is online now Administrator
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Pensacola, Florida
    Posts
    29,027

    Default Re: Netanyahu: Israel not obligated by NPT resolution

    Very little is said about NK, Pakistan, and India joining the NPT. All the discussion seems to be aimed at Israel. It just goes to show all the anti-semitism in the world today.

  4. #4
    Chris's Avatar
    Chris is online now Administrator
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Pensacola, Florida
    Posts
    29,027

    Default Re: Netanyahu: Israel not obligated by NPT resolution

    ANALYSIS / U.S. sacrificed Israel for success of NPT conference
    The conference of the signatories to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is a diplomatic victory for Egypt and a failure for Israel.
    By Yossi Melman

    The conference of the signatories to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is a diplomatic victory for Egypt and a failure for Israel. Israel can feel sacrificed by the U.S. on the altar of a successful conference. Israel's nuclear program, and the international assessment that it possesses an arsenal with dozens, if not hundreds of nuclear weapons, has become a hostage to the conference. The U.S. preferred its overall interest in advancing the idea of limiting nuclear weapons throughout the world, tighter inspections of nuclear installations and the spread of nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, over supporting Israel's needs. The rein lies the difference between the Obama administration and the one preceding it. During the previous meeting in 2005, the U.S. refused to accept parts of the draft document that called on Israel to join the NPT and turned down the idea of holding talks in order to create a region free of nuclear weapons - even at the cost of the conference's failure. President Barack Obama and his administration opted for success at the conference over Israel.

    On the face of it, the proposal deals with Israel in a fashion similar to the concluding document of the 1995 conference. Then, the Clinton administration agreed to have Israel mentioned in the document so that the "universality" of the NPT would be agreed upon. Then, too, there were disagreements between Egypt and the non-aligned states and the United States. However this time the decision differs and pushes forth two key issues beyond the 1995 document. It talks of a target date - 2012 - for holding a conference, and appointing a special coordinator who will visit the region and hold talks for holding such a conference. However, that is still very far removed from the possibility that Israel will join the NPT. This is a sovereign decision of Israel and it is not possible to impose it.

    more.................ANALYSIS / U.S. sacrificed Israel for success of NPT conference - Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •