 









|
 |
 |

Synopsis of the Books of the Bible
John Nelson Darby
1800-1882
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
Introduction
The Acts of the Apostles are divided essentially into three parts-chapters
1, 2 to 12; and 13 to the end. Chapters 11, 12 may be termed transitional
chapters founded on the event related in chapter 10. Chapter 1 gives us
that which is connected with the Lord's resurrection; chapters 2-12 that
work of the Holy Ghost of which Jerusalem and the Jews were the centre, but
which branches out into the free action of the Spirit of God, independent
of, but not separated from, the twelve and Jerusalem as the centre; chapter
13, and the succeeding chapters, the work of Paul, flowing from a more
distinct mission from Antioch; chapter 15 connecting the two in order to
preserve unity in the whole course. We have indeed the admission of
Gentiles in the second part, but it is in connection with the work going on
among the Jews. These latter had rejected the witness of the Holy Ghost to
a glorified Christ, as they had rejected the Son of God in His humiliation;
and God prepared a work outside them, in which the apostle of the Gentiles
laid foundations that annulled the distinction between Jew and Gentile, and
which unite them-as in themselves equally dead in trespasses and sins-to
Christ, the Head of His body, the assembly, in heaven.
Chapter 1
Let us now examine the chapters in their course. Chapter 1 supplies us with
the narrative of that which relates to Jesus risen, and the actions of the
apostles before the descent of the Holy Ghost. The Lord's communications
present several very interesting points. Jesus, the risen man, acts and
speaks by the Holy Ghost after His resurrection as before it. Precious
token of our own position, as reminding us that we shall have the Holy
Ghost after our resurrection, and that, being no longer engaged in
restraining and mortifying the flesh, His divine energy in us will be
entirely consecrated to eternal joy and worship, and to the service
committed to us by God. The risen Lord then gives His disciples
commandments in connection with the new position He assumes. Their life and
their service are to be formed and guided in view of His resurrection-a
truth of which they had irrefragable proofs. They were still on earth, but
they were pilgrims there, having Him in view who had gone before them
raised from among the dead. Their relations with Him are still connected
with their position on earth. He speaks to them of the kingdom, and of that
which concerned the kingdom. Jerusalem was the starting-point of their
ministry, even more than of His own. For He had gathered together the poor
of the flock wherever He had found them, especially in Galilee;
but now, resurrection having made Him in power the vessel of the sure
mercies of David, He calls Israel afresh to own as Prince and Saviour the
One whom they had rejected as the living Messiah on earth. The Epistles of
Peter are connected with the gospel in this point of view.
Nevertheless, to exercise this ministry, they were to wait for the
accomplishment of the Father's promise, the Holy Ghost, with whom they were
to be baptised, according to John's testimony, which the Lord assured them
should soon take place. The mission of the Holy Ghost led them, at the same
time, out of the Jewish field of purely temporal promises. The Father's
promise of the Holy Ghost was a very different thing from that of the
restoration of the kingdom of Israel by the power of Jehovah, the God of
judgment. It was not for them to know the time and season of this
restoration, the knowledge of which the Father kept in His own possession;
but they should themselves receive the power of the Holy Ghost, who would
come down upon them; and they should be witnesses unto Jesus (as they had
known Him, and according to the manifestation of Himself after His
resurrection), both in Jerusalem and in all Judea, and in Samaria, and unto
the uttermost parts of the earth-thus making Jerusalem the starting-point
and first object, according to the mission, Luke 24:47. Nevertheless,
their testimony was founded on their beholding their Master and their Lord
caught up from their midst, and received into the clouds of heaven, which
hid Him from their sight. While looking steadfastly upwards, as this took
place, two messengers from heaven come and announce to them that He will
return in like manner. His manifestation in this lower world, beneath the
heavens, is therefore here intended. He will return to earth to be seen of
the world. We have not the rapture of the assembly, nor the assembly's
association with Him while absent. With the knowledge of Jesus taken up out
of the world, and to come again into the world, as the termini and elements
of all their teaching, they return to Jerusalem, there to wait for the Holy
Ghost who was promised unto them. It is not into Galilee that they go. They
are to be witnesses in Jerusalem of the heavenly rights of that Christ who
had been rejected on earth by Jerusalem and the Jews.
All this clearly shews the position in which they were placed, and the
mission committed to them. But before they receive the Holy Ghost for its
fulfilment, some other characteristic circumstances find their place in
this chapter. They act, under the guidance of Peter, according to
intelligence in the word, before they are endowed with power from on high.
These two things are therefore distinct from each other.
It appears that, although Peter was not directly led of the Holy Ghost, the
Spirit put His seal on that which was done in accordance with the word in
the Old Testament understood by the apostle. We have before seen that
Christ, after His resurrection, opened the understanding of His disciples
that they might understand the scriptures. They now act, not having
received the Holy Ghost, according to a Jewish principle. They present the
lot to the Lord, that He may decide. Nevertheless the lot was not all, nor
was it drawn without making a distinction. Apostolic authority flowed from
the nomination of Christ Himself. Intelligence of the scriptures makes them
understand that which ought to be. The object which the Lord had assigned
to their service narrowed the choice to the little circle of those who
could fulfil that object. Their history made them capable, as Jesus had
said, of being His witnesses, because they had been with Him from the
beginning, and could now testify that this same Jesus, whom the Jews had
rejected and crucified, was indeed risen from among the dead.
Apostolic authority is exercised in Jerusalem on the Jewish principle,
before the gift of the Holy Ghost. In this there was neither research nor
the exercise of the human mind. "His bishopric let another take" guided
their conduct; the capacity to testify of Jesus in His life on earth, and
now of His resurrection and ascension, decided on the needed
qualifications; the lot of Jehovah determined the individual who was to
take Judas' place. Two are chosen, according to these needful
qualifications, and the lot falls upon Matthias, who is numbered with the
eleven apostles. But they were still without the promised power.
Chapter 2
Chapter 2 relates the fulfilment of this promise, in answer to the spirit
of dependence manifested in their united prayers.
The Spirit comes from above, in His own power, to possess and fill the dwelling-place prepared for Him.
This event, important beyond all others with respect to man's condition
here below, has here a very simple character, because there is no question
of the causes of this marvellous gift, of the work on which it depends, of
the glory with which it is connected and which it reveals, and of which it
is the earnest: we have here only the fact of its power. The disciples
"were endued with power from on high."
The form of its appearance, however, is characteristic. On Jesus the Holy
Ghost descended in the shape of a dove, because He was not to make His
voice heard in the streets, nor break the bruised reed, nor quench the
smoking flax. But here it was the power of God in testimony, the word;
which was like consuming fire, judging all that came before it.
Nevertheless it was in grace, and was to go beyond the narrow limits of
Jewish ordinances to proclaim the wonderful works of God to every tongue
and nation under the sun. It was that mighty wind from heaven, which
manifested itself to the disciples, and came upon them in the form of
tongues of fire, each one divided into several. This marvel attracts the
multitude; and the reality of this divine work is proved by the fact that
persons from numerous countries hear these poor Galileans proclaim to them
the wonderful works of God, each one in the language of the country whence
he came up to Jerusalem.
The Jews, who did not understand these languages, mock; and Peter declares
to them in their own tongue, and according to their own prophecies, the
true character of that which had taken place. He takes his stand upon the
resurrection of Christ, foretold by the prophet-king, and upon His
exaltation by the right hand of God. This Jesus, whom they had crucified,
had there received the promise of the Father, and shed forth that which
produced the effects that they heard and saw. They were therefore to know
assuredly, that God had made that same Jesus whom they had rejected both
Lord and Christ.
The character of this testimony will be remarked here. It is essentially
that of Peter. It goes no farther than the affirmation of the fact, that He
who had been rejected by the Jews is made in heaven Lord and Christ. It
begins with Jesus known of the Jews on earth, and establishes the truth of
His being raised again, and exalted to the position of Lord. God has done
this. The apostle does not even proclaim Him as the Son of God. We shall
see that, if it is not done by Peter in the Acts, Paul on the contrary does
it from the first moment of his conversion. Peter states the result at that
moment in power, and does not speak of the kingdom. He only reminds them
that the Spirit was promised in the last days, and alludes to the terrible
day of the coming judgment, which would be preceded by alarming signs and
wonders. Without speaking of the fulfilment of the promise of the kingdom,
the time of which the Father had kept secret, he puts the fact of the gift
of the Holy Ghost in connection with the responsibility of Israel, to whom
God still acted in grace, by preaching to them a glorified Christ, and by
giving them proofs of His glory in the gift of the Holy Ghost, made
sensible to all. This is the presence of the Holy Ghost according to John
15:26, 27. The testimony as a whole, however, is founded on and carries
out the mission of Luke 24. Only in Luke we have nothing of baptism. See
Luke 24:47-49, to which this fully corresponds. The testimony was
addressed to the Jews; nevertheless it was not confined to them,
and it was separative. "Separate yourselves from this untoward generation."
This separation was founded on a real and moral work-"repent": the past was
all to be judged, and publicly demonstrated by their reception amongst
Christians by baptism, in order to receive the remission of their sins, and
participate in this heavenly gift of the Holy Ghost. "Repent, and be
baptised every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of
sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost." This work is
individual. There was judgment on all the past, the admission amongst them
by baptism, and the consequent participation in the Holy Ghost, who dwelt
where they came. We see at once the difference between the moral change
already wrought, the repentance which their godly sorrow works, and the
reception of the Holy Ghost. This was consequent on the remission of their
sins to which they were brought. This gift depended in a regular way on
their admission amongst Christians, the house where He dwelt, built in the
name of Jesus. Afterwards the promise is declared to belong to them and to
their children-to the house of Israel as such-to them and to their children
after them. But it went beyond the limits of God's ancient people. The
promise was also to those that were afar off; for it was fulfilled, in
connection with faith in Christ, to all who through grace should come into
the new house-all whom the Lord, the God of Israel, should call. The call
of God characterised the blessing. Israel, with her children, was owned,
but a remnant called out from among them. The Gentiles, being called,
shared the blessing.
The result of this ineffable gift is related to us. It was not merely a
moral change, but a power which set aside all the motives that
individualised those who had received it, by uniting them as one soul and
in one mind. They continued steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine; they
were in communion with each other and the apostles; they broke bread; they
spent their time in prayer. The sense of God's presence was powerful among
them; and many signs and wonders were wrought by the hands of the apostles.
They were united in the closest bonds; no man called anything his own, but
all divided their possessions with those that needed. They were daily in
the temple, the public resort of Israel for religious exercises, whilst
having their own apart-breaking bread at home daily. They ate with joy and
gladness of heart, praising God, and having favour with all the people
around them.
Thus the assembly was formed; and the Lord added to it daily the remnant of
Israel, who were to be saved from the judgments that should fall on a
nation which had rejected the Son of God, their Messiah; and, thank God,
from yet deeper ruin. God brought into the assembly-thus owned of Him by
the presence of the Holy Ghost-those whom He spared in Israel.
A new order of things had commenced, marked by the presence of the Holy
Ghost.
Here was found the presence and the house of God, although the old order of
things still existed until the execution of judgment upon it.
The assembly was formed therefore by the power of the Holy Ghost come down
from heaven, on the testimony that Jesus, who had been rejected, was raised
up to heaven, being made of God both Lord and Christ. It was composed of
the Jewish remnant who were to be spared, with the reserve of bringing in
Gentiles whenever God should call them. It was as yet formed in connection
with Israel in the patience of God, yet apart in power, God's dwelling
place.
Chapter 3
In chapter 3 the Spirit addresses His testimony to the people by the mouth
of Peter. God still acted in patience towards His foolish people, and with
more than patience. He acts in grace towards them, as His people, in virtue
of the death and intercession of Christ-alas! in vain. Their unbelieving
leaders silenced the word.
The attention of the people is attracted by a miracle that restored
strength to a poor lame man, known to all who frequented the temple; and,
the multitude crowding to behold him, Peter preaches Christ to them. The
God of their fathers, said he, had glorified His servant Jesus, whom they
had denied, when Pilate would have set Him free. They had denied the Holy
One and the Just-desired a murderer-killed the Prince of Life; but God had
raised Him from the dead. And His name, through faith, had healed the
impotent man. Grace could esteem their act done as through ignorance, and
that as to their rulers also. We here see the Holy Ghost responding to the
intercession of Christ: "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they
do!" Guilty of the ten thousand talents, the great King remits it them,
sending the message of mercy which calls them to repentance. To this Peter
invites them: "Repent ye, and be converted; so
that the time of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord, and
that he may send Jesus, whom the heaven must receive," he tells them, until
the time ordained of God for the restoration which should accomplish all
that the prophets had foretold. That is to say, he preaches repentance to
the Jews as a nation, declaring that, on their repentance, Jesus, who had
ascended up to heaven, would return; and the fulfilment of all the
blessings spoken of by the prophets should take place on their behalf. The
return of Jesus with this object depended (and still depends) on the
repentance of the Jews. Meanwhile He remains in heaven.
Moreover Jesus was the prophet announced by Moses: and whosoever would not
hear Him should be cut off from the people. His voice still sounded in
especial grace by the mouth of His disciples. All the prophets had spoken
of these days. They were the children of the prophets, the natural heirs of
the blessings which they had announced for Israel, as well as of the
promises made to Abraham of a seed in whom all nations should be blessed.
To them also in consequence, God, having raised up His servant Jesus,
had sent Him to bless them, in turning away every one of them from his
iniquities.
Chapter 4
In a word, they are invited to return by repentance, and enjoy all the
promises made to Israel. The Messiah Himself should return from heaven to
establish their blessing. The whole nation is here addressed as natural
heirs of the promises made to Abraham. But, while they were speaking, the
priests, and the captain of the temple, and the Sadducees came to lay hands
on them, being grieved that they preached the resurrection, which their
unbelief and dogmatic system did not receive. They put them in prison, for
it was evening. The hope of Israel was set aside; the grace of God had
spoken in vain, great and patient as it was. Many, however, believed their
word: five thousand persons already confessed the Lord Jesus.
We have seen the address which God, in His grace, sent to Israel by the
mouth of Peter. We shall now see, not only the reception (already noticed)
which it met with from the rulers of the people, but the deliberate answer
of their inmost heart, as we may call it. On the morrow the rulers, the
elders, and the scribes assemble at Jerusalem, together with Annas and his
kindred; and, setting the apostles in their midst, they demand by what
power or in what name they have wrought this miracle on the impotent man.
Peter, full of the Holy Ghost, declares-announcing it to all Israel, and
with the utmost readiness and entire boldness-that it was by Jesus, whom
they had crucified, and whom God had raised from the dead. Thus the
question between God and the rulers of Israel was very formally stated, and
that by the Spirit of God. Jesus was the stone rejected by them, the
builders, which had become the head of the corner. Salvation could nowhere
else be found. No carefulness not to offend, with regard to the adversaries
and the rulers; with the people, as such, ignorant and misled, everything
to win them. The council recognised them as former companions of Christ:
the man who had been healed was there. What could they say or do in the
face of the multitude who had witnessed the miracle? They could only
exhibit a will in decided opposition to the Lord and His testimony, and
yield to the public opinion, which was necessary to their own importance,
by which too they were governed. With threats they commanded the apostles
to teach no more in the name of Jesus. We may remark here, that Satan had
Sadducean instruments arrayed against the doctrine of the resurrection, as
he had Pharisees as suited instruments against a living Christ. We must
expect the well-ordered opposition of Satan against the truth.
Now Peter and John allow of no ambiguity with respect to their course. God
had commanded them to preach Christ: the prohibition of man had no weight
with them. "We cannot," say they, "but speak the things which we have seen
and heard." What a position for the rulers of the people! Accordingly, a
testimony like this plainly demonstrates that the leaders of Israel were
fallen from the place of interpreters of the will of God. The apostles do
not drive them away-do not attack them: God would judge them; but they act
immediately on the part of God, and disregard their authority altogether
with respect to the work that God had committed to themselves. The
testimony of God was with the apostles, and not with the rulers of the
temple; and the presence of God was in the assembly, and not there.
Peter and John return to their own company, for a separate people who knew
each other was formed; and all, moved by the Holy Ghost (for it was there
that God dwelt by His Spirit, not now in the temple), lift up their voice
to God, the Governor of all things, to acknowledge that this opposition of
the rulers was but the accomplishment of the word and the counsels and the
purposes of God. These threatenings were but the occasion of asking God to
manifest His power in connection with the name of Jesus. In a word, the
world (including the Jews, who formed a part of it in their opposition) had
stood up against Jesus, the Servant of God, and opposed itself to the
testimony rendered to Him. The Holy Ghost is the strength of this
testimony, whether in the courage of those who bore witness (v. 8), or in
His presence in the assembly (v. 31), or in the energy of service (v. 33),
or in the fruits that are again produced among the saints with a power
which makes it manifest that the Holy Ghost has dominion in their hearts
over all the motives that influence man, making them walk by those of which
He is the source. It is the energy of the Spirit in the presence of
opposition, as before it was His natural fruit in those among whom He
dwelt. Fresh persons sell their goods, and lay their price at the apostles'
feet; among others, a man whom the Holy Ghost takes pleasure in
distinguishing-Barnabas, from the island of Cyprus.
To sum up this chapter demonstrates, on one side, the condition of the
Jews, their rejection of the testimony which was addressed to them in
grace; and on the other, the power of the Holy Ghost and God's presence and
guidance elsewhere, namely, in the midst of the disciples.
These three chapters (2-4) present the first forming of the assembly, and
its blessed character through the Holy Spirit dwelling in it. They present
to us its first beauty as formed of God, and His habitation.
Chapter 5
Alas! evil shews itself there also (chap. 5). If the mighty Spirit of God
is there, the flesh also is there. There are some who wished to have the
credit of devotedness which the Holy Ghost produces, although devoid of
that faith in God, and that self-renunciation, which, shewing itself in the
path of love, constitutes all the value and all the truth of this
devotedness. But it only gives fresh occasion to manifest the power of the
Spirit of God, the presence of God within, against evil; as the preceding
chapter shewed His energy outside, and the precious fruits of His grace. If
there be not the simple fruit and of good already described, there is the
power of good against evil. The present state of the assembly, as a whole,
is the power of evil over good. God cannot endure evil where He dwells;
still less than where He does not dwell. However great the energy of the
testimony which He sends to those who are outside, He exercises all
patience until there is no remedy within. The more His presence is realised
and manifested (and even in proportion as that is done), the more He shews
Himself intolerant of evil. It cannot be otherwise. He judges in the midst
of His saints, where He will have holiness; and that according to the
measure of the manifestation of Himself. Ananias and Sapphira disregarding
the presence of the Holy Ghost, whose impulse they pretended to follow,
fall down dead before the God whom, in their blindness, they sought to
deceive in forgetting Him. God was in the assembly.
Mighty, though painful, testimony to His presence! Fear pervades every
heart, both within and outside. In fact, the presence of God is a serious
thing, however great its blessing. The effect of this manifestation of the
power of a God present with those whom He acknowledged as His own was very
great. Multitudes joined themselves by faith to the confession of the name
of the Lord-at least from among the people, for the rest dared not. The
more position we have in the world, the more we fear the world which gave
it us. This miraculous testimony to the power of God was also displayed in
a still more remarkable way, so that people came from far to profit by it.
The apostles were constantly together in Solomon's porch.
But alas! the manifestation of the power of God, in connection with the
despised disciples of Jesus, and working outside the beaten track in which
the self-importance of the high priest and those that were with him found
its path, together with the progress made by that which they rejected, and
the attention drawn to the apostles by the miracles that were wrought,
excite the opposition and jealousy of the rulers; and they put the apostles
in prison. In this world good ever works in the presence of the power of
evil.
A power different from that of the Holy Ghost in the assembly now displays
itself. The providence of God, watching over His work, and acting through
the ministry of angels, frustrates all the plans of the unbelieving heads
of Israel. The priests shut up the apostles in prison. An angel of the Lord
opens the prison doors, and sends the apostles to pursue their accustomed
work in the temple. The officers whom the council send to the prison find
it shut, and everything in order; but no apostles.
Meanwhile the council are informed that they are in the temple, teaching
the people. Confounded and alarmed, the council send to fetch them; but the
officers bring them without violence, fearing the people. For God holds
everything in check, until His testimony be rendered, when He will have it
rendered. The high priest remonstrates with them on the ground of his
former prohibition. Peter's reply is more concise than on the former
occasion, and is rather the announcement of a settled purpose, than the
rendering a testimony by reasoning with those who will not hearken, and who
shewed themselves to be adversaries. It is the same in substance as what he
had said when previously brought before the rulers: God is to be obeyed
rather than men. Opposed to God, the heads of Israel were merely men. In
saying this, all was decided: the opposition between them and God was
evident. The God of their fathers had raised up Jesus, whom the rulers of
Israel had crucified. The apostles were His witnesses, and so was the Holy
Ghost, whom God had given to those who obeyed Him. All was said; the
position clearly announced. Peter, in the name of the apostles, formally
takes it on the part of God and of Christ, and in agreement with the seal
of the Holy Ghost, who, given to believers, bore witness in the Saviour's
name. Nevertheless there is no pride, no self-will. He must obey God. He
still takes his place in Israel ("the God," he says, "of our fathers"); but
the place of testimony for God in Israel. The advice of Gamaliel prevails
to turn aside the purposes of the council, for God has always His
instruments ready, unknown perhaps to us, where we are doing His will;
nevertheless they cause the apostles to be beaten, and command them not to
preach, and send them away. They were at a loss what to do-only made the
opposition of their will the more evident, while how simple the path when
sent of God, and consciously doing His will! We must obey God.
The object of this latter part of the chapter is to shew that the
providential care of God, whether miraculously by means of angels, or by
disposing the hearts of men to accomplish His purposes, was exercised on
behalf of the assembly, even as the Spirit of God bore testimony in it and
manifested in it His power. The apostles, in no wise terrified, return,
full of joy at being counted worthy to suffer for the name of Jesus; and
every day, in the temple, or from house to house, they cease not to teach
and to preach the good news of Jesus the Christ. However weak they might
be, God Himself maintains His testimony.
Chapter 6
Other evils, unhappily, assail the church (chap. 6). The flesh begins to
shew itself, in the midst of the power of the Holy Ghost, the trouble
arising from the different circumstances of the disciples, and in those
things in which grace had been especially manifested, on the side on which
they were connected with the flesh. The Hellenists (Jews born in Grecian or
heathen countries) murmur against the Hebrews (natives of Judea), because
the widows of the latter were favoured, as they imagined, in the
distribution of the goods bestowed on the assembly by its wealthier
members. But here the wisdom given by the Spirit meets the difficulty,
profiting by the occasion to give development to the work, according to the
necessities that were growing up; and seven persons are named to undertake
this business, for which the apostles would not forsake their own work. We
also find, in the case of Philip and Stephen, the truth of what Paul says:
"Those who have used the office of a deacon well, purchase to themselves a
good degree and great boldness in the faith which is in Christ Jesus."
Observe here, that the apostles put prayer before preaching in their work,
their conflict with the power of evil being more especially carried on in
it, as well as their realisation of the power of God for the strength and
wisdom they needed; and, in order that they might act directly on God's
part, it was necessary that grace and unction should be maintained in their
hearts.
Observe also the grace that discovers itself under the influence of the
Spirit of God in this matter: all the names, as far as we can judge, are
those of Hellenists.
The influence of the word extended, and many priests were obedient to the
faith. Thus, until now, the opposition from without, and the evil within,
did but minister occasion to the progress of the work of God, by the
manifestation of His presence in the midst of the church. Take especial
notice of this fact. It is not only that the Spirit does good by His
testimony, but, although evil is there without and within, yet where power
displays itself, that evil does but bear witness to the efficacy of His
presence. There was evil, but there was power to meet it. Still it shewed
there was leaven even in the Pentecostal cake.
The energy of the Spirit manifests itself especially in Stephen, who is
full of grace and power. The Hellenist Jews oppose him; and, not being able
to answer him, they accuse him before the council, and in particular of
having announced in the name of Jesus the destruction of the temple and of
the city, and the change of the customs of their law. Here, observe, we see
the free power of the Holy Ghost, without any sending by any other to the
work, as in the apostles appointed by Christ Himself. It is not authority
in the apostles, it is not in the Jews of Palestine. He distributes to whom
He will. It is the godly and devoted Hellenist who renders the last
testimony to the heads of the nation. If priests believe on the one side,
Jews from without Judea bear testimony on the other, and prepare the way
for a still more extended testimony; but at the same time for the
definitive rejection, morally, of the Jews as the basis and centre of the
testimony, and of the work of gathering together. For as yet Jerusalem was
the centre of testimony and gathering. Peter had testified of a glorious
Christ promising His return on their repentance, and they had stopped His
testimony. Now judgment is pronounced on them by the Holy Ghost through the
mouth of Stephen, in whom they shew themselves open adversaries to this
testimony. It is not the apostles who, by official authority, break off
with Jerusalem. The free action of the Holy Ghost anticipates a breach,
which did not take place so as to form a part of the scripture narrative.
The thing is done by the power of God; and the taking up to heaven of the
witness raised up by the Spirit to denounce the Jews as adversaries, and to
declare their fallen condition, placed the centre of gathering in heaven
according to the Spirit-that heaven to which the faithful witness, who was
filled with the Spirit, had gone up. Already, while on earth, he had the
appearance of an angel to the eyes of the council who judged him; but the
hardness of their hearts would not let them stop in the path of hostility
towards the testimony rendered to Christ-a testimony which comes out here
in a special way as the testimony of the Holy Ghost.
Chapter 7
Stephen,
as far as we are told, had not known the Lord during His life on earth.
Certainly he was not appointed, like the apostles, to be a witness of that
life. He was simply the instrument of the Holy Ghost, distributing to whom
He would.
He begins therefore their history from the beginning of God's way, that is,
from Abraham, called out by the revelation of the God of glory, slow indeed
to obey, but at length led by the patient grace of God into Canaan.
Nevertheless, he was a stranger in the promised land; and bondage was to be
the portion of his descendants, until God interposed in grace. The lot,
therefore, of the blessed patriarch was not that of possessing the
promises, but of being a stranger; and that of his descendants was to be
captives until God delivered them with a strong arm. Nothing can be more
striking than the calm superiority to circumstances displayed by Stephen.
He recites to the Jews a history they could not deny, a history they
boasted in, yet it condemned them utterly. They were doing as their fathers
had done. But two persons are specially prominent in Stephen's account, in
connection with the goodness of God towards Israel at this period-Joseph
and Moses. Israel had rejected them both, given up Joseph to the Gentiles,
rejected Moses as judge and leader. It was, in cases which the Jews could
not deny or object to, the history of Christ also, who, too, at the time
appointed of God, will indeed be the Redeemer of Israel. This is the
substance of Stephen's argument. The Jews had always rejected those whom
God had sent and in whom the Holy Ghost had acted, and the testimony of the
same Holy Ghost in the prophets who had spoken of the Christ whom they had
now betrayed and slain. Besides this, according to Moses, they had
worshipped false gods, even from the time of their deliverance out of Egypt
-a sin which, however great the long-suffering of God, would cause them to
be carried away, now that they had filled up the measure of their iniquity,
beyond the Babylon which had already been their punishment.
It is a most striking summing up of their whole history-the history of man
with all the means of restoration supplied. The full measure of guilt is
stated. They had received the law and had not kept it, rejected the
prophets who had testified of Christ, and betrayed and murdered Christ
Himself-always resisted the Holy Ghost. What they did trust in, the temple,
God rejected. God Himself has been, as it were, a stranger in the land of
Canaan; and if Solomon built Him a house, it was in order that the Holy
Ghost might declare that He who had heaven for His throne, and earth for
His footstool, whose dominion was universal, would not dwell in houses of
stone, which were the creation of His own hand. Thus we have the complete
summing up of their history, connected with the last days of their
judgment. They always resisted the Holy Ghost, as they had always disobeyed
the law. Judaism was judged, after the long patience of God and all His
ways of grace with man as means were exhausted. For Israel was man under
the special dealings and care of God. Man's guilt now is not only sin, but
sin in spite of all that God has done. It was the turning-point of man's
history. Law, prophets, Christ, the Holy Ghost, all tried, and man at
enmity against God. The cross had really proved it, but this had added the
rejection of the testimony of the Holy Ghost to a glorified Christ. All was
over with man, and began anew with the second Man ever in connection with
heaven.
Their conscience convicted, and their heart hardened, their will unchanged,
the members of the council were filled with rage, and gnashed upon him with
their teeth. But if Stephen was to bear this definitive testimony against
Israel, he was not merely to render the testimony, but much more to place
it in its true relative position, by a living expression of that which a
believer was in virtue of the presence of the Holy Ghost here below
dwelling in him. In their history we have man always resisting the Holy
Ghost; in Stephen, a man full of Him consequent on redemption.
Such are the elements of this touching and striking scene, which forms an
epoch in the history of the assembly. The heads of Israel gnash their teeth
with rage, against the mighty and convincing testimony of the Holy Ghost,
with which Stephen was filled. They had rejected a glorified Christ, as
they had slain a humbled one. Let us follow out the effect as to Stephen
himself. He looks stedfastly up to heaven; now fully opened to faith. It is
thither that the Spirit directs the mind, making it capable of fixing
itself there. He reveals to one who is thus filled with Himself the glory
of God on high, and Jesus in that glory at the right hand of God, in the
place of power-Son of man in the far higher place than that of Psalm 2,
that of Psalm 8, though all things were not yet put under Him (compare John
1:50, 51). Afterwards He gives the effect of the testimony borne in the
presence of the power of Satan, the murderer.
"I see," said Stephen, "the heavens opened." Such then is the position of
the true believer-heavenly upon the earth-in presence of the world that
rejected Christ, the murderous world; the believer, alive in death, sees by
the power of the Holy Ghost into heaven, and the Son of man at the right
hand of God. Stephen does not say "Jesus." The Spirit characterises Him as
the Son of man! Precious testimony to man! Nor is it to the glory of God
that he testifies (this was natural to heaven) but to the Son of man in the
glory, heaven being open to him, and then looks to Him as the Lord Jesus,
to receive his spirit, the first example and full testimony of the state of
the believer's soul after death with Christ glorified.
With regard to the progress of the testimony, it is not now that Jesus is
the Messiah, and He will return if you repent (which, however, does not
cease to be true), but it is the Son of man in heaven, which is open to the
man that is filled with the Holy Ghost-that heaven to which God is about to
transport the soul, as it is the hope and the testimony of those that are
His. The patience of God was doubtless still acting in Israel; but the Holy
Ghost opened new scenes and new hopes to the believer.
But remark that Stephen, in consequence of seeing Jesus in heaven,
perfectly resembles Jesus upon earth-a fact precious in grace to us: only
that the glory of His Person is in all cases carefully guarded. Jesus,
though heaven was opened to Him, was Himself the object to which heaven
looked down, and who was publicly owned and sealed of the Father. He did
not need a vision to present an object to His faith, nor did it produce any
transformation into the same image by revelation of the glory. But "Father,
into Thy hands I commit my spirit" is found in "Lord Jesus, receive my
spirit." And the affection for Israel which expresses itself in
intercession, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do," is
found again in "Lord, lay not this sin to their charge"; save that here the
Holy Ghost does not now affirm that they are ignorant.
But it is well to dwell a moment on that which brings out more clearly the
especial position of Stephen, the vessel of the Spirit's testimony, so
definitively rejected by the Jews; and the divine character and Person of
Jesus, even where His disciple is most like Him. Heaven is open to Jesus,
the Holy Ghost descends upon Him and He is acknowledged the Son of God.
Heaven opens on Jesus, and the angels descend upon the Son of man: but He
has no object presented to Him; He is Himself the object on which heaven is
gazing. Heaven will open at the end of the age, and Jesus Himself come
forth on the white horse (that is, in judgment and triumph). Here, too,
heaven opens, and the disciple, the Christian, full of the Holy Ghost, sees
into it, and there beholds Jesus at the right hand of God. Jesus is still
the object, before of heaven, now of the believing man who is filled with
the Holy Ghost; so that, as to the object of faith and the position of the
believer, this scene is definitively characteristic. Jesus has no object,
but is the object of heaven when it opens; the saint has, and it is Jesus
Himself in heaven when it is open. Rejected, and rejected by the Jews, like
Jesus, partaking in His sufferings, and filled with His Spirit of grace,
Stephen's eyes are fixed on high, on the heaven which the Holy Ghost opens
to him; and he sees the Son of man there ready to receive his spirit. The
rest will come later; but it is not only Jesus, whom the heavens must
receive until the times of restitution, but also the souls of His believing
people until the moment of resurrection, and the whole church, in spirit,
detached from the world that rejected Him, and from Judaism that opposed
the testimony of the Holy Ghost. The latter, Judaism, is no longer at all
recognised; there is no longer any room for the long-suffering of God
towards it. Its place is taken by heaven, and by the assembly, which, so
far as it is consistent, follows her Master there in spirit, while waiting
for His return.
Chapter 8
Saul was present at Stephen's death, and consenting to it.
This is the end of the first phase of the assembly of God-its history in
immediate connection with Jerusalem and the Jews, as the centre to which
the work of the apostles related, "beginning at Jerusalem"; carried on,
however, in a believing remnant, but inviting Israel, as such, to come into
it, as being nationally the object of the love and care of God, but they
would not. Some accessory events follow, which enlarge the sphere of labour
and maintain the unity of the whole, previously to the revelation of the
call of the Gentiles, as such, properly speaking, and of the assembly as
one body, independent of Jerusalem, and apart from the earth. These events
are-the work of Philip in the conversion of Samaria and of the Ethiopian;
that of Cornelius, with Peter's vision that took place after the vocation
of Saul, who himself is brought in by a Jew of good report among the Jews
as such; the labours of Peter in all the land of Canaan; and, finally, the
connection established between the apostles at Jerusalem and the converted
Gentiles at Antioch; the opposition of Herod, the false king of the Jews,
and the care which God still takes of Peter, and the judgment of God upon
the king. Afterwards comes the direct work among the Gentiles, having
Antioch for its starting-point, already prepared by the conversion of Paul,
through means and with a revelation that were quite peculiar. Let us follow
the details of these chapters.
After the death of Stephen persecution breaks out. The victory, gained by a
hatred the accomplishment of whose object was allowed by Providence, opens
the floodgates to the violence of the Jewish leaders, enemies to the
gospel. The barrier that restrained them once broken, the waves of passion
overflow on all sides. People are often held back by a little remaining
conscience, by habits, by a certain idea of the rights of others; but when
the dykes are broken, hatred (the spirit of murder in the heart) satiates
itself, if God permit, by actions that shew what man is when left to
himself. But all this hatred accomplishes the will of God, in which man
would perhaps otherwise have failed, and which in some respects he could
not or ought not even to have executed, that is to say, the will of God in
sovereign judgment. The dispersion of the assembly was Israel's judgment-a
judgment which the disciples would have found it difficult to declare and
to execute by the communication of greater light to them; for whatever may
be the blessing and energy in the sphere where the grace of God acts, the
ways of God in directing all things are in His own hand. Our part, too, in
His ways as to those without, is in grace.
The whole assembly then, except the apostles, is scattered. It is
questionable also, that the apostles did right in remaining, and whether a
more simple faith would not have made them go away, and thus have spared
the assembly many a conflict and many a difficulty in connection with the
fact that Jerusalem continued to be a centre of authority.
The Lord had even said with Israel in view, "When they persecute in one
city, flee into another"; and after His resurrection He commands them to go
and disciple all nations. This last mission we do not find executed in the
history of the Acts and the work among the Gentiles, and, as we see in
Galatians 2, by a special agreement entered into at Jerusalem, it fell into
the hands of Paul, being placed on an entirely new footing. The word tells
us nothing of the accomplishment of this mission of the twelve towards the
Gentiles, unless it be the slight general intimation in the end of Mark.
God is mighty in Peter toward the circumcision and in Paul towards the
Gentiles. It may be said that the twelve were not persecuted. It is
possible, and I say nothing decided on the point; but it is certain that
the passages which I have quoted have no fulfilment in the Bible history,
and that another arrangement, another order of things, took place in lieu
of that which the Lord prescribed, and that Jewish prejudices had in fact
an influence, resulting from this concentration at Jerusalem, from which
even Peter had the greatest difficulty to free himself.
Those who were scattered abroad preached the word everywhere, but only to
the Jews, before some of them arrived at Antioch (chap. 11:19).
Philip however went down to Samaria, and preached Christ to them, and
wrought miracles. They all give heed to him and are even baptised. A man
who until then had bewitched them with sorcery, so that they had said he
was the great power of God, even he also submits to the power which
eclipsed his false marvels, and convinced him so much the more of its
reality as he was conscious of the falseness of his own. The apostles make
no difficulty with regard to Samaria. The history of Jesus must have
enlightened them in that respect. Moreover, the Samaritans were not
Gentiles. Still it was a Hellenist who preached the gospel there.
A new truth comes out here in connection with the regular process of the
assembly-namely, that the apostles conferred the Holy Ghost by means of
prayer and the laying on of hands: a very important fact in the history of
God's dealings. Moreover Samaria was a conquest which all the energy of
Judaism had never been able to make. It was a new and splendid triumph for
the gospel. Spiritual energy to subdue the world appertained to the
assembly. Jerusalem was set aside: its day was over in that respect.
The presence of the power of the Holy Ghost acting in Peter preserves the
assembly as yet from the entrance of hypocrites, the instruments of Satan.
The great and powerful fact that God was there manifested itself and made
the darkness evident which circumstances had concealed. Carried along by
the strong current, Simon had yielded, as to his intelligence, to the
authority of Christ whose name was glorified by Philip's ministry. But the
true condition of his heart, the desire of his own glory, the complete
opposition between his moral condition and all principle-all light from
God-betrays itself in presence of the fact that a man can impart the Holy
Ghost. He desires to buy this power with money. What a thought! It is thus
that the unbelief which appears quite to pass away, so that the things of
God are outwardly received, betrays itself by something which, to one who
has the Spirit, is so grossly contrary to God that its true character is
manifest even to a child taught by God Himself.
Samaria is thus brought into connection with the centre of the work of
Jerusalem, where the apostles still were. Already the Holy Ghost's being
bestowed on the Samaritans was an immense step in the development of the
assembly. Doubtless they were circumcised, they acknowledged the law,
although the temple had in a certain degree lost its importance. The body
of believers was more consolidated, and, so far as they still held to
Jerusalem, it was a positive gain; for Samaria, by receiving the gospel,
entered into connection with her ancient rival, as much as the apostles
themselves were so, and submitted to her. Probably the apostles, during
that time of persecution, did not go to the temple. God had opened a wide
door to them outside, and thus made them ample amends in their work, for
the success of the rulers of Israel who had stopped it in Jerusalem; for
the energy of the Spirit was with them. To sum up: that which is presented
here is the free energy of the Spirit in others than the apostles, and
outside Jerusalem which had rejected it; and the relations maintained with
the apostles and Jerusalem by their central action, and the authority and
power with which they were invested.
Having accomplished their work, and themselves evangelised several villages
of the Samaritans, Peter and John return to Jerusalem. The work outside
goes on, and by other means. Philip, who presents the character of prompt
unquestioning obedience in simplicity of heart, is called to leave his
prosperous work with which all his personal importance (if he had been
seeking it) was connected, and in which he was surrounded with respect and
affection. "Go," said the angel of the Lord, "toward the south, unto the
way that leads from Jerusalem to Gaza." It was a desert. Philip's ready
obedience does not think of the difference between Samaria and Gaza, but of
the Lord's will: and he goes. The gospel now extends to the proselytes from
among the Gentiles, and makes its way to the centre of Abyssinia. The
Queen's treasurer is admitted among the disciples of the Lord by baptism,
which sealed his faith in the testimony of the prophet Isaiah; and he goes
on his way, rejoicing in the salvation which he had taken a toilsome
journey from a far country to seek in legal duties and ceremonies, but with
faith in God's word, in Jerusalem. Beautiful picture of the grace of the
gospel! He carries away with him, and to his home, that which grace had
bestowed on him in the wilderness-that which his wearisome journey to
Jerusalem had not procured him. The poor Jews, who had driven away the
testimony from Jerusalem, are outside everything. The Spirit of the Lord
carries Philip far away, and he is found at Azotus; for all the power of
the Lord is at the service of the Son of man for the accomplishment of the
testimony to His glory. Philip evangelises all the cities unto Caesarea.
Chapter 9
A work and a workman of another character begin now to dawn upon the scene.
We have seen the inveterate opposition of the heads of Israel to the
testimony of the Holy Ghost, their obstinacy in repelling the patient grace
of God. Israel rejected all the work of the God of grace in their behalf.
Saul makes himself the apostle of their hatred to the disciples of Jesus,
to the servants of God. Not content with searching them out at Jerusalem,
he asks for letters from the high priest, that he may go and lay hands on
them in foreign cities. When Israel is in full opposition to God, he is the
ardent missionary of their malice-in ignorance, no doubt, but the willing
slave of his Jewish prejudices.
Thus occupied, he approaches Damascus. There, in the full career of an
unbroken will, the Lord Jesus stops him. A light from heaven shines round
about him, and envelopes him in its dazzling brightness. He falls to the
earth, and hears a voice saying unto him, "Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou
me?" The glory which had thrown him to the ground left no doubt-accompanied
as it was by that voice-that the authority of God was revealed in it. His
will broken, his pride overthrown, his mind subdued, he asks, "Who art
thou, Lord?" The authority of the One who spoke was unquestionable; Saul's
heart was subject to that authority: and it was Jesus. The career of his
self-will was ended for ever. But moreover the Lord of glory was not only
Jesus; He also acknowledged the poor disciples, whom Saul desired to carry
prisoners to Jerusalem, as being Himself.
How many things were revealed in those few words! The Lord of glory
declared Himself to be Jesus, whom Saul persecuted. The disciples were one
with Himself. The Jews were at open war with the Lord Himself. The whole
system which they maintained, all their law, all their official authority,
all the ordinances of God, had not prevented their being at open war with
the Lord. Saul himself, armed with their authority, found himself occupied
in destroying the name of the Lord and His people from off the earth: a
terrible discovery, completely overwhelming his soul, all-powerful in its
effects, not leaving one moral element of his soul standing before its
strength. Extenuation of the evil was fruitless; zeal for Judaism was zeal
against the Lord. His own conscience had only animated that zeal. The
authorities constituted of God, surrounded with the halo of centuries of
honour, enhanced by the present calamities of Israel which had now nothing
but her religion-these authorities had but sanctioned and favoured his
efforts against the Lord. The Jesus whom they rejected was the Lord. The
testimony which they endeavoured to suppress was His testimony. What a
change for Saul! What a new position, even for the minds of the apostles
themselves who remained at Jerusalem, when all were dispersed-faithful
indeed in spite of the opposition of the rulers of Israel, but themselves
in connection with the nation.
But the work went deeper yet. Misguided no doubt, but his conscience in
itself-for he thought he ought to do many things against the name of Jesus
of Nazareth-left him the enemy of the Lord. Blameless righteousness
according to law, as man could measure it, more than left him hardened in
open opposition to the Lord. His superiors, and the authorities of the
ancient religion-all his soul was based on morally as well as
religiously-all was smashed within him for ever. He was broken up in the
whole man before God. Nothing remained in him but discovered enmity against
God, save as his own will was also broken in the process, he who an hour
before was the conscientious, blameless, religious man! Compare, though the
revelation of Christ carried him much farther, Galatians 2:20; Philippians
3; 2 Corinthians 1:9; 4:10; and a multitude of passages.
Other important points are brought out here. Saul had not known Jesus on
earth. He had not a testimony because he had known Him from the beginning,
declaring that He was made Lord and Christ. It is not a Jesus who goes up
into heaven where He is out of sight; but the Lord who appears to him for
the first time in heaven, and who announces to him that He is Jesus. A
glorious Lord is the only one whom he knows. His gospel (as he expresses it
himself) is the gospel of the glory. If he had known Christ after the
flesh, he knows Him thus no more. But there is yet another important
principle found here. The Lord of glory has His members on earth. "I am
Jesus, whom thou persecutest." It was Himself: those poor disciples were
bone of His bones and flesh of His flesh. He looked upon them and cherished
them as His own flesh. The glory and the oneness of the saints with Jesus,
their Head in heaven, are the truths connected with the conversion of Saul,
with the revelation of Jesus to him, with the creation of faith in his
heart, and that in a way which overthrew Judaism in all its bearings in his
soul; and that in a soul in which this Judaism formed an integral part of
its existence, and gave it its whole character.
Another point, borrowed from his account of the vision later in the book,
which is remarkable in connection with his career: "Separating thee," says
the Lord, "from the people and from the Gentiles, to whom I now send thee."
This moral end of Saul separated him from both-of course from the Jews, but
did not make a Gentile of him either-and united him with a glorified
Christ. He was neither a Jew nor a Gentile in his spiritual standing. All
his life and ministry flowed from his association with a heavenly glorified
Christ.
Nevertheless he comes into the assembly by the usual means-like Jesus in
Israel-humbly taking his place there where the truth of God was established
by His power. Blind for three days and fully engrossed-as was natural-with
such a discovery, he neither eats nor drinks; and afterwards, besides the
fact of his blindness, which was a quiet, continual, and unequivocal proof
of the truth of that which had happened to him, his faith must have been
confirmed by the arrival of Ananias, who can declare to him from the Lord
that which had happened to him, although he had not been out of the city-a
circumstance so much the more striking because, in a vision, Saul had seen
him come and restore his sight. And this Ananias does: Saul receives sight,
and is baptised. He takes food and is strengthened. The conversation of
Jesus with Ananias is remarkable, as shewing with what distinct evidence
the Lord revealed Himself in those days, and the holy liberty and
confidence with which the true and faithful disciple conversed with Him.
The Lord speaks as a man to his friend in details of place and
circumstances, and Ananias reasons in all confiding openness with the Lord
in regard to Saul; and Jesus answers him, not in harsh authority, though of
course Ananias had to obey, but with gracious explanation, as with one
admitted to His confidence, by declaring that Saul is a chosen vessel to
bear His name before Gentiles and kings and the children of Israel; and
that He will shew him how great things he must suffer for His sake.
Saul makes no delay in confessing and declaring his faith; and that which
he says is eminently worthy of notice. He preaches in the synagogue that
Jesus is the Son of God. It is the first time that this is done. That He
was exalted to the right hand of God-that He was Lord and Christ-had been
already preached; the rejected Messiah was exalted on high. But here it is
the simple doctrine as to His personal glory; Jesus is the Son of God.
In the words of Jesus to Ananias, the children of Israel come last.
Saul does not yet begin his public ministry. It is, so to speak, only the
expression of his personal faithfulness, his zeal, his faith, among those
that surrounded him, with whom he was naturally connected. It was not long
before opposition manifested itself, in the nation that would have no
Christ, at least according to God, and the disciples sent him away, letting
him down by the wall in a basket; and through the agency of Barnabas (a
good man, and full of the Holy Ghost and of faith, whom grace had taught to
value the truth with regard to the new disciple) the dreaded Saul found his
place among the disciples even at Jerusalem.
Wonderful triumph of the Lord! Singular position for himself there, had he
not been absorbed by the thought of Jesus. At Jerusalem he reasons with the
Hellenists. He was one of them. The Hebrews were not his natural sphere.
They seek to put him to death; the disciples bring him down to the sea, and
send him to Tarsus, the place of his birth. The triumph of grace has, under
God's hand, silenced the adversary. The assemblies are left in peace, and
edify themselves-walking in the fear of God and in the comfort of the Holy
Ghost, the two great elements of blessing; and their numbers increase.
Persecution accomplishes the designs of God. The peace which He grants
gives opportunity for ripening in grace and in the knowledge of Himself. We
learn the ways and government of God in the midst of the imperfection of
man.
Peace being established through the goodness of God-sole resource of those
who truly wait upon Him in submission to His will-Peter passes throughout
all parts of Israel. The Spirit of God relates this circumstance here,
between the conversion of Saul and his apostolic work, to shew us, I doubt
not, the apostolic energy in Peter existing at the very time when the call
of the new apostle was to bring in new light, and a work that was new in
many important respects (thus sanctioning as His own work, and in its
place, that which had been done before, whatever progress in accomplishment
His counsels might make); and in order to shew us the introduction of the
Gentiles into the assembly as it was at first founded by His grace in the
beginning, preserving thus its unity, and putting His seal upon this work
of heavenly grace.
The assembly existed. The doctrine of her oneness, as the body of Christ,
outside the world, was not yet made known.The reception of Cornelius did
not announce it, although paving its way.
Chapter 10
The undiminished power of Peter, his apostolic authority, in the midst of
which the entrance of Cornelius into the spiritual house of God takes
place, in connection with Peter's ministry, and that, after the calling of
Saul, which opened a new perspective-all these facts taken together
confirmed that which went before. The original work was in no wise set
aside to bring in another. Nevertheless, Peter's vision did not reveal the
assembly as the body of Christ, neither did the admission of Cornelius.
They only shewed that in every nation he who feared God was acceptable to
Him-in a word, that the favour of God was not limited to the Jews, and that
there was no need of becoming a Jew in order to share the salvation that is
in Christ. The oneness of the body united to its Head in heaven was not
brought out by this event; but it prepared the way for the promulgation of
that truth, since in fact the Gentile was admitted on earth without
becoming a Jew. The thing was done on earth individually, although the
doctrine itself was not taught. Repentance unto life eternal was granted to
the Gentiles as such. The Holy Ghost-the seal of christian blessing among
the Jews, the fruit of redemption accomplished by Jesus-was given to
Gentiles as to Jews. The latter might be astonished at it; but there was no
resisting God. Through grace they could praise Him for it.
>From chapter 9:32 to 11:18, we find then, the power of the Spirit of God
with Peter in the midst of Israel, and the admission of Gentiles into the
earthly assembly, without their becoming Jews, or submitting to the ancient
order which was passing away; the seal of the Spirit put upon them; and the
heads of the assembly at Jerusalem, and the most ardent of the
circumcision, accepting the fact as the will of God, and praising Him while
submitting to it, in spite of their prejudices. The door then is open to
the Gentile. This was an immense step. The precious doctrine of the
assembly had yet to be announced.
Peter had proclaimed the call of the Gentiles in his first discourse; but
to realise it, and give form to its conditions, in connection with that
which had already existed historically, required the intervention, the
authority, and the revelation of God. Progress is evident through the
patient grace of God; for it was not the wisdom of man. Altogether Jewish
at the commencement, the people of Jerusalem were taught that Jesus would
return if they repented. This testimony of grace is rejected, and, in the
person of him who maintained it, the firstfruits of the assembly go up to
heaven. The Holy Ghost, in His sovereign liberty, acts in Samaria and among
the proselytes. The assembly being scattered by the persecution, Saul is
brought in by the revelation of a glorious Christ, and by a testimony from
His mouth which implies the union of saints on earth with Himself their
Head in heaven as only one body. After this a pious Gentile, converted but
still a Gentile, receives faith in Christ and the Holy Ghost; so that,
marked out by this testimony-this seal from God Himself to his faith-the
apostle and the disciples who were the most attached to Judaism receive
him; Peter by baptising him, and the others by accepting Peter's act.
Let us notice here, that salvation is not only the fact of being quickened
and pious, but that of complete deliverance so as to present us to Himself
in righteousness, which God grants to every one who has life through the
operation of God. Cornelius was pious and earnestly so; but he hears words
of a work done for him whereby he may be, and (as we know) was saved.
Finally the seal of the Holy Ghost, upon believing in Jesus,
is the ground on which those whom God accepts are acknowledged. That is to
say, it is the full evidence for man.
Chapter 11
Chapter 11:19 begins the narration of the new order of things by which the
ministry of Paul is distinguished. Among those who were scattered abroad on
the occasion of Stephen's death, and who went as far even as Antioch
preaching the Lord Jesus, there were some who, being men of Cyprus and
Cyrene, were more habitually connected with Greeks. They addressed the
Greeks therefore in this ancient capital of the Seleucidae, and many
received their word and turned to the Lord. The assembly at Jerusalem,
already prepared through the conversion of Cornelius, by which God had
shewn them the entering in of the Gentiles, accept this event also and send
Barnabas-himself a man of Cyprus-to Antioch. A good man and filled with the
Holy Ghost, his heart is full of joy on seeing this work of the grace of
God; and much people is added unto the Lord.
As yet all is linked with the work at Jerusalem, although extending now to
the Gentiles. Barnabas, apparently no longer sufficient for the work and at
all events led of God, departs in search of Saul, who had gone to Tarsus,
when they sought to kill him at Jerusalem. And these two meet with the
assembly at Antioch, teaching much people. Still everything takes place in
connection with Jerusalem, whence some prophets come down and announce a
famine. The links between the flock and Jerusalem as a centre are shewn and
strengthened, by the sending of relief to that religious metropolis of
Judaism, and of Christianity looked at as having its commencement in the
Jewish remnant who believed in Jesus as the Christ.
Barnabas and Saul are themselves charged with this service, and go up to
Jerusalem to accomplish it. This circumstance carries us back to Jerusalem,
where the Spirit has still something to shew us of the ways of God.
Chapter 12
Herod, to please the Jews, begins to persecute the assembly in that city.
We may remark here, that the company of believers at Antioch are also
called the assembly (church), which is the case nowhere else as yet. All
were accounted as forming a part integrally of the work at Jerusalem, (18-)
even as all Jews were in connection with that centre of their religious
system, however numerous their synagogues or great the influence of their
rabbis. Every Jew, as such, sprang from Jerusalem. Barnabas and Saul
assemble with the church or assembly at Antioch. A local assembly,
conscious of its existence-distinct from, while connected with,
Jerusalem-has been formed; and assemblies without a metropolis begin to
appear.
To return to Jerusalem. Herod, an impious king, and in certain respects a
type of the adversary-king at the end, begins to persecute the faithful
remnant at Jerusalem. It is not only the Jews who are opposed to them. The
king-whom, as Jews, they detested-unites himself to them by his hatred to
the heavenly testimony, thinking to win their favour by this means. He
kills James, and proceeds to take Peter and put him in prison. But God
preserves His servant, and delivers him by His angel in answer to the
prayers of the saints. He allows some to be slain (happy witnesses to their
heavenly portion in Christ), and preserves others to carry on the testimony
on earth, in spite of all the power, apparently irresistible, of the
enemy-a power which the Lord baffles by the manifestation of that which
belongs to Him and to Him alone, and which He employs when He will and how
He will. The poor saints, although praying fervently (they had
prayer-meetings in those days), can hardly believe, when Peter comes to the
door, that God had really granted their prayer. The desire presents itself
sincerely to God; faith can scarcely reckon upon Him.
Herod, confounded by the power of Him whom he resisted, condemns the
instruments of his hatred to death, and goes away to the Gentile seat of
his authority. There displaying his glory, and accepting the adulatory
homage of the people, as thoughhe were a god, God Himself smites him, and
shews that He is the governor of this world, however great the pride of
man. But the word of God extends through His grace; and Barnabas and Saul,
having fulfilled their ministry, return to Antioch, taking with them John
whose surname was Mark.
Chapter 13
We come now to the beginning of the direct history of the work, new in some
important respects, that is, connected with Paul's mission by the immediate
intervention of the Holy Ghost. It is not now Christ upon earth, who by His
personal authority sends forth the twelve, afterwards endowed with the
power of the Holy Ghost from on high to announce His exaltation to heaven
and His return, and to gather under the standard of the cross those who
should believe in Him. Paul has seen Christ in glory, and therefore has
united himself to the assembly already gathered. But here there is no
Christ personally present to send him forth as the witness of His presence
on earth, or of His rejection as One whom Paul had known in earth. The Holy
Ghost Himself sends him, not from Jerusalem, but from a Greek city, in
which in free and sovereign power He had converted and gathered together
some Gentiles, doubtless some Jews likewise, but forming an assembly whose
existence was first marked by the fact that the gospel had been preached to
the Greeks.
In chapter 13 we find ourselves again in the assembly at Antioch, and in
the midst of the independent
action of the Spirit of God. Certain prophets are there, Saul among them.
They fasted and were occupied with the service of the Lord. The Holy Ghost
commands them to separate unto Him Barnabas and Saul for the work to which
He had called them Such was the source of the ministry of these two.
Assuredly it bore testimony to Him in whom they had believed, and whom
Saul, at least, had seen, and it was under His authority they acted; but
the positive and obvious source of their mission was the Holy Ghost. It was
the Holy Ghost who called them to the work. They were sent forth (v. 4) by
Him-an all-important principle as to the Lord's ways upon earth. We come
out from Jerusalem, from Judaism, from the jurisdiction of the apostles
nominated by the Lord while He was on earth. Christ is no longer known
after the flesh, as Saul (when become Paul) expresses it. They have to
strive against the Judaic spirit-to shew consideration for it as far as it
is sincere; but the sources of their work are not now in connection with
the system which that work no longer knows as a starting-point. A glorious
Christ in heaven, who owns the disciples as members of His body as Himself
on high-a mission from the Holy Ghost on earth which only knows His energy
as the source of action and authority (bearing testimony of course to
Christ)-this is the work which now opens, and which is committed to
Barnabas and Saul. Barnabas, it is true, forms a link between the two. He
was himself a Hellenist of Cyprus; it was he who presented Saul to the
apostles after his conversion near Damascus. Barnabas had more largeness of
heart-was more open to the testimonies of divine grace-than even the
apostles and the others who had been nurtured in a strict Judaism; for God
in His grace provides for everything. There is always a Barnabas, as well
as a Nicodemus, a Joseph, and even a Gamaliel, whenever needed. The actings
of God in this respect are remarkable in all this history. Would that we
only trusted more entirely, while by the Spirit doing His will, to Him who
disposes all things!
Nevertheless even this link is soon broken. It was still in connection with
the "old cloth," the "old bottles"; blessed as the man himself was, to whom
the Holy Ghost rendered so fine a testimony, and in whom we see an
exquisite character. He determined to take his kinsman also (see Col. 4:
10), Mark. Mark returns to Jerusalem almost from the beginning of the work
of evangelisation in the Gentile regions; and Saul continues his work with
such instruments as God formed under his hand, or a Silas who chose to
remain at Antioch when (the particular service which had been committed to
him at Jerusalem being ended) he might naturally have returned thither with
Judas.
Sent forth thus by the Holy Ghost, Barnabas and Saul, with John Mark as
their ministering servant, go away to Seleucia, then to Cyprus; and being
at Salamis, a town in that island, they preach the word of God in the
synagogues of the Jews. Whatever therefore might be the energy of the Holy
Ghost, He acts in connection with the counsels and the promises of God, and
that with perfect patience. To the end of his life, notwithstanding the
opposition of the Jews, vexatious and implacable as it might be, the
apostle continues-as the ways and counsels of God in Christ had
commanded-to the Jews first, and then to the Gentiles. Once brought in
where truth and grace were fully revealed in God's assembly, there was no
difference between Jew and Gentile. God is one in His character and fully
revealed, and the veil rent; sin is one in its character and is opposed to
God; the foundation of truth changes not, and the oneness of the assembly
is connected with the height of grace in God and comes down to the deep
totality of sin, in respect of which that grace has displayed itself. But,
with regard to the ways of God upon earth, the Jews had the first place,
and the Spirit, who is above all, can therefore act in full liberty in
recognising all the ways of God's sovereignty; even as Christ, who made
Himself a servant in grace, submitted to them all, and now, being exalted
on high, unites all these various ways and dispensations in Himself as head
and centre of a glory to which the Holy Ghost bears witness, in order to
accomplish it here below, as far as may be, by grace.
This does not prevent his giving a distinct and positive judgment as to the
condition of the Jews when the occasion requires it.
Even here, at the commencement of his ministry, the two things are
presented together. We have already noticed that he begins with the Jews.
Having traversed the island, he arrives at the seat of government. There
the proconsul, a prudent and thoughtful man, asks to hear the gospel. Beset
already by a false prophet (who took advantage of the felt need of a soul
which, while ignorant, was earnestly desirous of something that could fill
up the void it experienced in the nothingness of pagan ceremonies, and in
its disgusting immorality), he sends for Barnabas and Saul. Elymas
withstands them. This was natural. He would lose his influence with the
governor if the latter received the truth that Paul preached Now Elymas was
a Jew. Saul (who is henceforth named Paul) filled with the Holy Ghost,
pronounces on him the sentence, on God's part, of temporary blindness,
executed at the moment by the mighty hand of God. The proconsul, struck
with the power that accompanied his word, submits to the gospel of God.
I do not doubt that in this wretched Bar-jesus we see a picture of the Jews
at the present time, smitten with blindness for a season, because jealous
of the influence of the gospel. In order to fill up the measure of their
iniquity, they withstood its being preached to the Gentiles. Their
condition is judged: their history given in the mission of Paul.
Opposed to grace, and seeking to destroy its effect upon the Gentiles, they
have been smitten with blindness-nevertheless only for a season.
Departing from Paphos, they go into Asia Minor; and now Paul definitively
takes his place in the eyes of the historian of the Spirit. His whole
company are only those who were with Paul, an expression in Greek which
makes Paul everything (Paul's company Lit. "those around Paul"). When they
reached Perga, John Mark leaves them to return to Jerusalem-a milder and
more moderate form of the Judaic influence, but shewing that, wherever it
exercised itself, if it did not produce opposition, it at least took away
the vigour needful for the work of God as it was now unfolding among the
Gentiles. Barnabas however goes farther, and still continues with Paul in
the work. The latter, when they were come to Antioch,
again begins first with the Jews. He goes on the sabbath day into the
synagogue, and, on the invitation of the ruler, proclaims Jesus, rejected
by the Jews at Jerusalem and crucified, but by the power of God raised up
again, and through whom they might be justified from all things, from which
they could not be justified by the law of Moses. Here the testimony of Paul
is very like that of Peter, and is very particularly allied to the
beginning of the Epistle to the Hebrews, with regard to the character of
the testimony: verse 33 is quite Peter's testimony in Acts 3. In verse 31
he sets the twelve distinctly in the place of testimony to Israel, as those
who had personally accompanied the Lord, and who had seen Him after His
resurrection. "They are," he says, "his witnesses unto the people." But
Paul's testimony (which, as to the fulfilment of the promises by the coming
of Christ, and the mercies of David made sure in His resurrection, returns
into the order of Peter's preaching) departs from it in an important point.
He says nothing of God's having made Jesus both Lord and Christ. He
announces that the remission of sins is proclaimed in His name, exhorting
his hearers not to neglect this great salvation.
Many follow Paul
and Barnabas in consequence of this announcement, and are exhorted by them
to continue in the grace which had been proclaimed to them. The mass of the
people come together the following sabbath to hear the word of God; the
Gentiles having besought that this gospel of grace might be preached to
them again. Their souls had found more truth in the doctrine of the one
only God, acknowledged by the Jews, than in the senseless worship of the
Pagans, which, to an awakened and unsatisfied mind, no longer presented any
food that could appease it-a mind that was too active to allow the
imagination to amuse itself with ceremonies which had no charms but for
ignorance, which could be captivated by the pageantry of festivals, to
which it was accustomed, and which gratified the religious element of the
flesh. Still, the coldly acknowledged doctrine of one only true God,
although it set the mind free from all that shocked it in the senseless and
immoral mythology of Paganism, did not at all feed the soul as did the
powerful testimony of a God acting in grace, borne by the Holy Ghost
through the mouth of messengers whom He had sent-a testimony which, while
faithful to the promises made to the Jews, yet addressed itself as a "word
of salvation" (v. 26) to all those who feared God. But the Jews, jealous of
the effect of the gospel which thus met the soul's need in a way that their
system could not, withstand Paul and blaspheme the doctrine of Christ. Paul
therefore and Barnabas turn boldly to the Gentiles.
It was a decisive and important moment. These two messengers of the Holy
Ghost quote the testimony of the Old Testament with regard to God's purpose
towards the Gentiles, of whom Christ was to be the light-a purpose which
they accomplished according to the intelligence in it that the Spirit gave
them, and by His power. The passage is in Isaiah (chap. 49), where the
opposition of Israel, that made the testimony of Christ useless to
themselves, gave God occasion to declare that this work was but a small
thing, and that Christ should be a light to the Gentiles, and great even to
the ends of the earth.
We shall do well to observe this last circumstance, the energy in action
imparted by spiritual intelligence, and the way in which prophetic
declarations turn into light and authority for action, when the Spirit of
God gives the true practical meaning-the application. Another might not
perhaps understand it; but the spiritual man has a full guarantee for his
own conscience in the word which he has understood. He leaves the rest to
God.
The Gentiles rejoice at the testimony, and the election believe. The word
spreads through all the region. The Jews now shew themselves in their true
character of enemies to the Lord and to His truth. With regard to them Paul
and Barnabas shake off the dust of their feet against them. The disciples,
whatever might be their difficulties, are no hindrance to this. The
position here taken by the Jews-which, moreover, we find everywhere-makes
us understand what a source of grief and pain they must have been to the
apostles.
Chapter 14
Their missionary labours continue in Iconium with the same opposition from
the Jews who, incapable themselves of the work, stir up the Gentiles
against those who are performing it. As long as it was only opposition, it
was but a motive for perseverance; but, being warned in time of an assault
that was planned against them, they depart to Lystra and Derbe. There,
having healed a cripple, they excite the idolatrous respect of these poor
pagans; but, filled with horror, they turn them from their error by the
energy of the Holy Ghost-faithful to the testimony of their God. Hither
also the Jews follow them. Now, if man will not ally himself with the
idolatry of the heart, and accept exaltation from men, the power of his
testimony, which they began by admiring as long as they thought they could
elevate man and acquire importance through their flatteries being accepted,
ends by exciting the hatred of their hearts. The Jews bring this hatred
into action and stir up the people, who leave Paul for dead. But he rises
up and re-enters the city, remaining tranquilly there another day, and on
the morrow he goes with Barnabas to Derbe.
Afterwards they revisit the cities through which they had passed, and at
Lystra, Iconium, and Antioch, they confirm the disciples in the faith, and
teach them that they must pass through tribulation to inherit the kingdom.
They choose elders for them; and passing through some other cities to the
place where they had disembarked, they return to Antioch, from whence they
had been commended to God for the work, causing great joy to the disciples
there in that the door of faith was opened to the Gentiles. This is the
first formal mission among the Gentiles where assemblies are formed, elders
appointed by the apostles, and the hostility of the Jews to the grace of
God, outside their nation and independently of their law, is distinctly
marked. The word assumes a positive character among the Gentiles, and the
energy of the Holy Ghost displays itself to this end, constituting and
forming them into assemblies, establishing local rulers in them, outside
and independently of the action of the apostles and assembly at Jerusalem,
and the obligation of the law which was still maintained there.
A question concerning this (that is, whether it could be allowed) is soon
raised at Antioch. It is no longer the opposition of the Jews hostile to
the gospel, but the bigotry of those who had embraced it, desiring to
impose the law on the converted Gentiles. But the grace of God provides for
this difficulty also.
Chapter 15
Chapter 15 contains the account of this. Certain persons come from
Jerusalem, where all was still going on in connection with the requirements
of the law; and they seek to impose these requirements on the Gentiles in
this new centre and starting-point of the work which was formed at Antioch.
It was the will of God that this matter should be settled, not by the
apostolic authority of Paul, or by the action of His Spirit at Antioch
only, which might have divided the church, but by means of conference at
Jerusalem, so as to maintain union, whatever might be the prejudices of the
Jews. The ways of Godin this respect are remarkable, shewing the way in
which He has maintained sovereign care in grace over the church. In reading
the Epistle to the Galatians, we see that in reality things were in
question that touched Christianity to the quick, that affected its very
foundations, the deep principles of grace, of the rights of God, of the
sinful condition of man-principles on which the whole edifice of man's
eternal relations with God is founded. If any one was circumcised, he was
under the law; he had given up grace, he had fallen away from Christ.
Nevertheless Paul the apostle, Paul full of faith, of energy, of burning
zeal, is obliged to go up to Jerusalem, whither he had not desired to go,
in order to arrange this matter. Paul had laboured at Antioch; but the work
in that city was not his work. He was not the apostle at Antioch as he was
that of Iconium, of Lystra, and afterwards of Macedonia and of Greece. He
went out from Antioch, from the bosom of the church already formed there.
The question was to be settled for the church, apart from the apostolic
authority of Paul. The apostle must yield before God and His ways.
Paul disputes with the men from Judea, but the end is not gained. It is
determined to send some members of the church to Jerusalem, but with them
Paul and Barnabas, so deeply interested in this question. Moreover Paul had
a revelation that he should go up. God directed his steps. It is good
however to be obliged to submit sometimes, although ever so right or so
full of spiritual energy.
The question then is entered upon at Jerusalem. It was already a great
thing that the subjecting of the Gentiles to the law should be resisted at
Jerusalem, and still more that they should there decide not to do it. We
see the wisdom of God in so ordering it, that such a resolution should have
its origin at Jerusalem. Had there been no bigotry there, the question
would not have been necessary; but alas! good has to be done in despite of
all the weakness and all the traditions of men. A resolution made at
Antioch would have been a very different thing from a resolution made at
Jerusalem. The Jewish church would not have acknowledged the truth, the
apostolic authority of the twelve would not have given its sanction to it.
The course at Antioch and of the Gentiles would have been a course apart;
and a continual struggle would have commenced, having (at least in
appearance) the authority of the primitive and apostolic church on the one
side, and the energy and liberty of the Spirit with Paul for its
representative on the other. The Judaizing tendency of human nature is ever
ready to abandon the high energy of the Spirit, and return into the ways
and thoughts of the flesh. This tendency, nourished by the traditions of an
ancient faith, had already given sorrow and difficulty enough to him who
was specially labouring among the Gentiles according to the liberty of the
Spirit, without the additional strength of having the course of the
apostles and of the church at Jerusalem to countenance it.
After much discussion at Jerusalem, full liberty for which was given,
Peter, taking the lead, relates the case of Cornelius. Afterwards Paul and
Barnabas declare the wonderful manifestation of God through the power of
the Holy Ghost which had taken place among the Gentiles. James then sums up
the judgment of the assembly, which is assented to by all, that the
Gentiles shall not be obliged to be circumcised, or to obey the law; but
only to abstain from blood, from things strangled, from fornication, and
from meat offered to idols. We shall do well to consider the nature and
stipulations of this decree.
It is a direction which teaches, not that which is abstractedly good or
evil, but that which was suitable to the case presented. It was
"necessary," not "righteous before God," to avoid certain things. The
things might be really evil, but they are not here looked at in that way.
There were certain things to which the Gentiles were accustomed, which it
was proper they should renounce, in order that the assembly might walk as
it ought before God in peace. To the other ordinances of the law they were
not to be subjected. Moses had those who preached him. That sufficed,
without compelling the Gentiles to submit to his laws, when they joined
themselves, not to the Jews, but to the Lord.
This decree therefore does not pronounce upon the nature of the things
forbidden, but upon the opportuneness-the Gentiles having in fact been in
the habit of doing all these things. We must observe that they were not
things forbidden by the law only. It was that which was contrary to the
order established by God as Creator, or to a prohibition given to Noah when
he was told to eat flesh. Woman was only to be connected with man in the
sanctity of marriage, and this is a very great blessing. Life belonged to
God. All fellowship with idols was an outrage against the authority of the
true God. Let Moses teach his own laws; these things were contrary to the
intelligent knowledge of the true God. It is not therefore a new law
imposed by Christianity, nor an accommodation to the prejudices of the
Jews. It has not the same kind of validity as a moral ordinance that is
obligatory in itself. It is the expression to christian intelligence of the
terms of man's true relations with God in the things of nature, given by
the goodness of God, through the leaders at Jerusalem, to ignorant
Christians, setting them free from the law, and enlightening them with
regard to the relations between God and man, and to that which was proper
to man-things of which, as idolatrous Gentiles, they had been ignorant. I
have said, addressed to christian intelligence: accordingly there is
nothing inconsistent in eating anything that is sold at the shambles; for I
acknowledge God who gave it, and not an idol. But if the act implies
communion with the idol, even to the conscience of another, it would be
provoking God to jealousy; I sin against Him or against my neighbour. I do
not know whether an animal is strangled or not, but if people act so as to
imply that it is indifferent whether life belongs to God or not, I sin
again; I am not defiled by the thing, but I fail in christian intelligence
with regard to the rights of God as Creator. With regard to fornication,
this enters into the category of christian purity, besides being contrary
to the order of the Creator; so that it is a direct question of good and
evil, and not only of the rights of God revealed to our intelligence. This
was important as a general principle, more than in the detail of the things
themselves.
In sum the principles established are these: purity by marriage according
to God's original institution; that life belongs to God; and the unity of
God as one only true God-Godhead, life, and God's original ordinance for
man. The same thing is true of the foundations laid by the assembly at the
basis of their decree, "It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us."
The Holy Ghost had manifested Himself in the case of Cornelius and of the
conversion of the Gentiles, of which Peter and Paul and Barnabas had given
the account. On the other hand the apostles were the depositaries of the
authority of Christ, those to whom the government of the assembly as
founded in connection with the true Jewish faith had been committed. They
represented the authority of Christ ascended on high, even as the power and
will of the Holy Ghost had been shewn in the cases I have just mentioned.
The authority was exercised in connection with that which, in a certain
sense, was the continuation of a Judaism enlarged by fresh revelations, and
which had its centre at Jerusalem, acknowledging as Messiah the ascended
Jesus rejected by the people. Christ had committed to them the authority
necessary to govern the assembly. They had also been sealed on the day of
Pentecost in order to perform it.
The spirit of grace and wisdom is truly seen in their way of acting. They
give their full sanction to Paul and Barnabas, and they send with them
persons of note in the assembly at Jerusalem, who could not be suspected of
bringing an answer in support of their own pretensions, as might have been
supposed in the case of Paul and Barnabas.
The apostles and elders assemble for deliberation; but the whole flock acts
in concert with them.
Thus Jerusalem has decided that the law was not binding on the Gentiles.
These, sincere in their desire of walking with Christ, rejoice greatly at
their freedom from this yoke. Judas and Silas, being prophets, exhort and
confirm them, and afterwards are dismissed in peace. But Silas thinks it
good to remain on his own account, influenced by the Spirit. He prefers the
work among the Gentiles to Jerusalem. Judas returns from it to Jerusalem.
The work continues at Antioch by means of Paul and Barnabas and others. At
Antioch we again see the full liberty of the Holy Ghost.
Paul proposes to Barnabas that they should go and visit the assemblies
already formed by their means in Asia Minor. Barnabas consents, but he
determines to take John who had formerly forsaken them. Paul wishes for
some one who had not drawn back from the work, nor abandoned for his own
home the place of a stranger for the work's sake. Barnabas insists; and
these two precious servants of God separate. Barnabas takes Mark and goes
to Cyprus. Now Mark was his kinsman, and Cyprus his own country. Paul takes
Silas, who had preferred the work to Jerusalem instead of Jerusalem to the
work and departs. From his name we may believe that Silas was a Hellenist.
It is happy to find that, after this, Paul speaks of Barnabas with entire
affection, and desires that Mark should come to him, having found him
profitable for the ministry.
Moreover Paul is commended by the brethren to the grace of God in his work.
The title given to Paul and Barnabas by the apostles shews the difference
between the apostolic authority, established by Christ in person, and that
which was constituted such by the power of the Holy Ghost-sent by Christ
Himself, no doubt, but in point of fact going forth by the direction of the
Holy Ghost, and their mission warranted by His power. With the apostles,
Paul and Barnabas have no title except their work-"men that have hazarded
their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ." They are that which the
Holy Ghost has made them. The apostles are the twelve.
The liberty and the power of the Spirit characterise Paul He is that which
the Spirit makes him. If Jesus had appeared to him, although Ananias can
testify it, he must in reality prove it by the power of his ministry. The
effects of this ministry are related as well as its character in chapters
16-20. The action and the liberty of the Holy Ghost are there displayed in
a remarkable manner.
Chapter 16
There is perhaps no example of this more remarkable than that which Paul
does with regard to Timothy. He uses circumcision in all liberty to set
aside Jewish prejudice. It is very doubtful whether, according to the law,
he ought to have been circumcised. Ezra and Nehemiah shew us the strange
wives sent away; but here, the mother being a Jewess, Paul causes the child
of this mixed marriage to follow the rule of the Jews and submit to that
rite. Liberty fully recognises the law in its place, although itself exempt
from it, and distinctly states, for the assurance of the Gentiles, the
absence of all pretension, on the part of the Judaean Christians, to impose
the law upon Gentiles. Paul circumcises Timothy, and does not give
subjection for an hour to those who would have compelled Titus to be
circumcised. He would become a Jew to the Jews from love; but the Jews
themselves must renounce all pretension to impose the law on others. The
decrees given at Jerusalem are left with the churches-a plain answer to
every Jew who desired to subject the Gentiles to Judaism. The decrees, we
may remark, were those of the apostles and the elders.
It is the Holy Ghost alone who directs the apostle. He forbids him to
preach in Asia (the province), and will not suffer him to go into Bithynia.
By a vision in the night they are called to go into Macedonia. Here the
historian meets them. It is the Lord who calls them into Macedonia. It is
well to note here that, while the gospel is sent under Paul's ministry to
the whole creation under heaven, yet there is specific direction as to
where we are to go.
Here the apostle goes first to the Jews, even when it was only a few women
who came together by the river side-a place, as it appears, usually chosen
where there was no synagogue. A Greek woman, who worshipped the God of
Israel, is converted by grace. Thus the door is opened, and others also
believe (v. 40). Here Satan tries to tamper with the work by bearing a
testimony to the ministers of the word. Not that this spirit acknowledged
Jesus-he would not then have been an evil spirit, he would not have thus
possessed the damsel. He speaks of the agents, in order to have a share of
the glory, and of the most high God-compelled perhaps by the presence of
the Spirit to speak, as had been the case with others by the presence of
Jesus, when His power was before their eyes. The testimony of Satan could
not go so far as to own Him Lord; and if Paul had not been faithful, it
would have mixed up the work of the enemy with that of the Lord. But it was
not a testimony to Paul that Paul sought, nor a testimony rendered by an
evil spirit, whatever might be the appearance of its testimony. The proof
which the evil spirit had to give that the power of God was present, was to
submit to it by being driven away. It could not be a support to the work of
God. We see in this circumstance the disinterestedness of the apostle, his
spiritual discernment, the power of God with him, and the faith which will
have no other support than that of God. It would have been useful to have a
testimony rendered to his ministry: the reasonings of the flesh might have
said, 'I did not seek it.' Persecution would have been avoided. But God
will have no other testimony than that which He bears to Himself. No other
can be a testimony from Him, for He reveals Himself where He is not known;
faith waits only on Him to render it. Paul went on without troubling
himself about this malicious attempt of the enemy's, and possibly in wisdom
avoiding conflict where there was no fruit for the Lord, until by its
persistency the apostle was forced to attend to it. The Spirit of God does
not tolerate the presence of an evil spirit when it makes itself actively
manifest before Him. He does not lend Himself to its devices by giving it
importance through a voluntary interposition; for He has His own work, and
He does not turn away from it to occupy Himself about the enemy. He is
occupied, in love, about souls. But if Satan comes in His way, so as to
perplex these souls, the Spirit reveals Himself in His energy, and the
enemy flees before Him.
But Satan is not without resources. The power which he cannot exercise in a
direct way, he employs in exciting the passions and lusts of men in
opposition to that power against which he cannot himself stand, and which
will neither unite itself to him nor recognise him. Even as the Gadarenes
desired Jesus to depart, when He had healed Legion, so the Philippians rise
up tumultuously against Paul and his companions at the instigation of the
men who had lost their dishonest gains. But God makes use of all this to
direct the progress of His own work, and give it the form He pleases. There
is the gaoler to be converted, and the magistrates themselves are to
confess their wrong with respect to the messengers of God. The assembly is
gathered out, a flock (as the epistle addressed to them bears witness) full
of love and affection. The apostle goes to labour elsewhere. We see a more
active, a more energetic, testimony here than in the similar case that
happened to Peter. The intervention of God is more striking in Peter's
case. It is the old Jerusalem, worn out in everything except hatred, and
God faithful to the one who trusted in Him. The hatred is disappointed.
Paul and Silas sing, instead of quietly sleeping; the doors burst suddenly
open; and the gaoler himself is converted, and his family. The magistrates
are obliged to come as supplicants to Paul. Such is the result of the
tumult. The enemy was mistaken here. If he stopped their work at Philippi,
he sent the apostles to preach elsewhere according to the will of God.
We must not pass over in silence this energy which embraced whole houses,
and subdued them to the christian faith. We only see it, however, when it
is a question of bringing in the Gentiles.
But Cornelius, Lydia, the gaoler of Philippi, are all witnesses to this power.
Chapter 17
In the last case it was the power exercised by the enemy over the passions
of the Gentiles that caused the persecution of the apostles: at
Thessalonica we again find the old and universal enmity of the Jews.
Nevertheless many Jews and proselytes received the gospel. After a tumult
there also, the apostles go away to Berea. There the Jews are more noble;
what they hear, they examine by the word of God. Through this a great
number among them believed. Nevertheless the Jews of Thessalonica, jealous
of the progress the gospel made, go over to Berea. Paul leaves the city and
passes on to Athens. Silas and Timothy remain for the moment at Berea, Paul
being the special object of the Jews' pursuit. At Athens, although he
resorted to the synagogue, yet, his spirit stirred at the sight of the
universal idolatry in that idle city, he disputes daily in public with
their philosophers; consequent on these interviews, he proclaims the true
God to the chief men of that intellectual capital. He had sent word to
Silas and Timothy to join him there.
With a people like the Athenians-such is the effect of intellectual
cultivation without God-he has to come down to the lowest step in the
ladder of truth. He sets forth the oneness of God, the Creator, and the
relationship of man to Him, declaring also that Jesus will judge the world,
of which God had given proof by raising Him up from the dead. With the
exception of the judgment of this world being put in place of the promises
respecting the return of Jesus, we might think it was Peter addressing the
Jews. We must not imagine that the historian relates everything that Paul
said. What is given is his defence, not his preaching. The Holy Ghost gives
us that which characterised the manner in which the apostle met the
circumstances of those he addressed. That which remained on the minds of
his first hearers was that he preached Jesus and the resurrection. It
appears even that some took the resurrection, as well as Jesus, to be a
God. It is, indeed, the basis of Christianity, which is founded on Jesus
personally, and the fact of His resurrection; but it is only the basis.
I have said that we are reminded here of Peter's preaching. I mean as to
the degree of height in his doctrine with regard to Christ. We shall
observe, at the same time, the appropriateness of the application of facts
in either case to the persons addressed. Peter set forth the rejected
Christ ascended on high, ready to return on the repentance of the Jews, and
who would establish at His coming all things of which the prophets had
spoken. Here the judgment of the world-sanction of the truth to the natural
conscience-is presented to the learned men, and to the inquisitive people;
nothing that could interest their philosophic minds, but a plain and
convincing testimony to the folly of their idolatry, according even to that
which the natural conscience of their own poets had acknowledged.
The dishonest gain, to which Satan ministered opportunity, met the gospel
at Philippi; the hardness and moral indifference of knowledge that
flattered human vanity, at Athens; at Thessalonica, the efforts of Jewish
jealousy. The gospel goes on its way, victorious over the one, yielding to
the effect of another, and, after laying bare to the learned Athenians all
that their condition tolerated, leaving them, and finding, amid the luxury
and the depraved manners of the wealthy city of Corinth, a numerous people
to bringinto the assembly. Such are the ways of God, and the exercises of
His devoted servant led by the Holy Ghost.
We may notice, that this energy, which seeks the Gentiles, never loses
sight of the favour of God towards His elect people-a favour that sought
them until they rejected it.
Chapter 18
At Thessalonica Paul twice received succour from Philippi; at Corinth,
where money and commerce abounded, he does not take it, but quietly works
with two of his countrymen of the same trade as himself. He again begins
with the Jews, who oppose his doctrine and blaspheme. The apostle takes his
course with the boldness and decision of a man truly led of God, calmly and
wittingly, so as not to be turned aside. He shakes his garments in token of
being pure of their blood, and declares that now he turns to the Gentiles
according to Isaiah 49, taking that prophecy as a command from God.
In Corinth God has "much people." He therefore uses the unbelieving
indifference of Gallio to defeat the projects and malice of the Jews,
jealous as ever of a religion that eclipsed their importance, whatever
might be its grace towards them. Paul, after labouring there a long time,
goes away in peace. His Jewish friends, Priscilla and Aquila, go with him.
He was going himself to Jerusalem. He was also under a vow. The opposition
of the Jews does not take away his attachment to his nation-his
faithfulness in preaching the gospel to them first-in recognising
everything that belonged to them in grace before God. He even submits to
Jewish ordinances. Possibly habit had some influence over him, which was
not of the Spirit; but according to the Spirit he had no thought of
disallowing that which the patient grace of God granted to the people. He
addresses himself to the Jews at Ephesus. They are inclined to hear him,
but he desires to keep the feast at Jerusalem. Here he is still a Jew with
his feasts and vows. The Spirit has evidently introduced these
circumstances to give us a true and complete picture of the relationship
that existed between the two systems-the degree of freedom from the
influence of the one, as well as the energy that established the other. The
first remains often to a certain degree, where energy to do the other is in
a very high degree. The liberty that condescends to prejudices and habits
is not the same thing as subjection to these prejudices in one's own
person. In our feebleness the two mingle together; but they are in fact
opposed to each other. To respect that which God respects, even when the
system has lost all real force and value, if called to act in connection
with this system when it is really nothing more than a superstition and a
weakness, is a very different thing from putting oneself under the yoke of
superstition and weakness. The first is the effect of the Spirit; the last,
of the flesh. In us, alas! the one is often confounded with the other.
Charity becomes weakness, giving uncertainty to the testimony.
Paul takes his journey; goes up to Jerusalem, and salutes the assembly;
goes down to Antioch, and visits again all the first assemblies he had
formed, thus binding all his work together-Antioch and Jerusalem. How far
his old habits influenced him in his ways of acting, I leave the reader to
judge. He was a Jew. The Holy Ghost would have us see that he was as far as
possible from any contempt for the ancient people of God, for whom divine
favour will never change. This feeling was surely right. It appears
elsewhere that he went beyond the limits of the Spirit and of spirituality.
Here we have only the facts. He may have had some private reason that was
valid in consequence of the position in which he stood. One may be in
circumstances which contradict the liberty of the Spirit, and which,
nevertheless, when we are in them, have a certain right over us, or
exercise an influence which necessarily weakens in the soul the energy of
that liberty. We may have done wrong in putting ourselves into those
circumstances, but, being in them, the influence is exercised, the rights
assert their claim. A man called to serve God, driven out from his father's
house, walks in the liberty of the Spirit. Without any change in his
father, he goes into the paternal house: the rights of his father
revive-where is his liberty? Or a man possessed of much clearer spiritual
intelligence places himself in the midst of friends who are spiritually
altogether below him: it is almost impossible for him to retain a spiritual
judgment. However it may have been here, the link is now formed voluntarily
on the part of him who stood in the place of liberty and grace, and the
Christians in Jerusalem remain at the level of their former prejudices, and
claim patience and indulgence from him who was the vessel and the witness
of the liberty of the Spirit of God.
This, with the supplement of his work at Ephesus, forms the circle of the
active labours of the apostle in the gospel, to shew us in him the ways of
the Spirit with men.
Chapter 19
>From verse 24 of chapter 18 to verse 7 of chapter 19 we have a kind of
summary of the progress made by the doctrine of Christ, and of the power
that accompanied it. Apollos knew only of the teaching of John; but,
upright in heart, he publicly confessed and preached that which he knew. It
was the faith of a regenerate soul. Aquila and Priscilla enlighten him
fully with regard to the facts of the gospel, and the doctrine of a dead
and glorified Christ. At Corinth he becomes a powerful teacher of the
gospel, of the Lord among the Jews, thus confirming the faith of the
disciples. The energy of the Holy Ghost manifests itself in him without any
intervention of the apostle or of the twelve. He acts independently; that
is, the Spirit acts independently in him. People could say, "I am of
Apollos." It is interesting to see these different manifestations of the
power and liberty of the Spirit, and to remember that the Lord is above
all, and that, if He acts greatly by a Paul, He acts also in whom He will.
In that which follows we find, on another side, the progress of the divine
revelation in union with Paul's apostolic power made very prominent by the
capability of communicating the Holy Ghost. Twelve persons had believed,
but with no other instruction than that of John: their baptism had been in
reference to it. It was a Christ to come, and a Holy Ghost whom He would
communicate, that they looked for. Now John's baptism required repentance,
but in no way came out of the Jewish pale; although it opened a perspective
of something different, according to the sovereignty of God, and as the
effect of Christ's coming. But it was a baptism unto repentance for man on
the earth, and not Christ's death and resurrection. Grace acted in a
remnant, but of whom Jesus was a companion on earth. Now Christianity (for
man's sin has been fully manifested) is founded on death and resurrection;
first, that of Christ, thus accomplishing redemption, and then on our death
and resurrection with Him so as to place us in Him and as Him before God in
sinless life, life of His life, and washed in His blood from all our sins.
But John's baptism, in fact, only taught repentance here below in order to
receive Christ; Christianity taught the efficacy of the death and
resurrection of a rejected Christ, in virtue of which the Holy Ghost, the
Paraclete come down from heaven, should be received.
These twelve men (although John had announced that the baptism of the Holy
Ghost should be the result of Christ's intervention) did not know whether
there was yet any Holy Ghost
a plain proof that they had not come into the house of God in which He
dwelt. Paul explains this to them, and they are baptised in the name of
Jesus. Paul, in his apostolic capacity, lays his hands on them; and they
receive the Holy Ghost. They speak with tongues, and they prophesy.
This power, and he who was its instrument, were now to be brought out into
distinct relief. The capital city of Asia (that is, of the Roman province
so named) is the theatre in which this was to be effected. We shall see a
power displayed in this locality, which acts independently of all
traditional forms, and which governs all that surrounds it, whether man,
conscience, or the enemy-an organising power, which forms of itself and for
itself the institutions and the body that suit it, and which governs the
whole position. The power of active grace has been displayed in the work of
Paul, beginning with Antioch; and had shewn itself in different ways. Here
we have some details of its formal establishment in a great centre.
During three months of patience he preaches Christ in the synagogue, and
reasons with the Jews, conscious of divine strength and of the truth. He
grants precedence, as the sphere of testimony, to that which had been the
instrument and the people of God: "To the Jews first." It is no longer
said, "Salvation is of the Jews," but it is preached to them first.
But this work having had its development, and many taking the place of
adversaries, Paul acts as the founder of that which was according to God
and on the part of God. He separates the disciples, and discourses upon
Christianity in the hall of a Greek who had a public class. This went on
for two years: so that the doctrine was spread through all the country
among both the Jews and the Greeks. God did not fail to bear testimony to
the word of His grace, and His power was displayed in a remarkable manner
in connection with the person of the apostle who bore the testimony. The
manifestations of the enemy's power disappear before the action of this
liberative power of the Lord, and the name of Jesus was glorified. Now the
reality of this action was demonstrated in a striking way, that is, its
source in the personal, positive, and real action of the Lord on the one
side, and on the other, the mission of Paul, and faith as the instrument by
which this supernatural power wrought. Certain Jews desired to avail
themselves of it for their own self-interest; and devoid of faith, they use
the name of "Jesus whom Paul preached" as though it had been a kind of
charm. But the evil spirit, whose power was as true and real in its way as
that of the Lord which he was forced to acknowledge when it was in
exercise, knew very well that here it was not so, that there was neither
faith nor power. "Jesus I know," said he, "and who Paul is I know; but who
are ye?" And the man who was possessed attacked and wounded them. Striking
testimony to the action of the enemy, but at the same time to that superior
force. to the reality of that intervention of God. which was carried into
effect by means of Paul. Now, when God shews Himself, conscience always
shews itself; and the power of the enemy over it is manifested and ceases.
The Jews and Greeks are filled with fear, and many who became Christians
brought the proofs of their sorceries.
The mighty action of the Spirit shewed itself by the decision it produced,
by the immediate and unhesitating acting out of the thoughts and
resolutions produced in the heart. There were no long inward arguments; the
presence and the power of God produced their natural effects.
The enemy's resources were, however, not exhausted. The work of God was
done, in the sense of the establishment of the testimony through apostolic
labour; and God was sending His servant elsewhere. The enemy, as usual,
excites a tumult, stirring up the passions of men against the instruments
of the testimony of God. Paul had already intended to go away, but a little
later; he had therefore sent Timothy and Erastus before him into Macedonia,
purposing to visit Macedonia, Achaia, and Jerusalem, and afterwards to go
to Rome; and he still remains some time in Asia. But after the departure of
these two brethren, Demetrius excites the people against the Christians.
Inveterate against the gospel, which shook the whole system in connection wi
th which he made his fortune, and which was linked with all that gave him
importance, this agent of the enemy knew how to act on the passions of the
workmen who had the same occupation as himself; for he made little portable
shrines to Diana, in silver. His employment was connected with that which
all the world admired, with that which had possession of men's minds-a
great comfort to man who feels the need of something sure-with that which
had long given its hue to their religious habits. A great part of the
influence exercised was, not "Great is Diana!" but "Great is Diana of the
Ephesians!" It was, in short, the power of the enemy among the Gentiles.
The Jews apparently sought to avail themselves of this by putting one
Alexander forward-the same possibly who had withstood Paul, and who they
supposed would therefore be listened to by the people. But it was the evil
spirit of idolatry that agitated them; and the Jews were foiled in their
hope. Paul was prevented, both by the brethren and by some of the
Asiarchs,(26)
from shewing himself in the theatre. The assembly was dissolved by the town
authorities; and Paul, when he had seen the disciples, went away in peace.
His work there was finished, and the gospel planted in the capital of the
province of Asia, and even in the whole province: Greece and Macedonia had
already received it.
There was yet Rome. In what manner should he go thither? This is now the
remaining question. His free and active life ended with the events which
now occupy us, as far as it is given us by the Holy Ghost. A life blessed
with an almost unequalled faith, with an energy that surpassed anything
that has been seen in men, and which, through the divine power that wrought
in it, produced its effects in spite of obstacles apparently
insurmountable, in spite of every kind of opposition, in contempt and
destitution, and which stamped its character on the assembly by giving it,
instrumentally, its existence; and that, not only in spite of two hostile
religions which divided the civilised world between them, but in spite of a
religious system which possessed the truth, but which ever sought to
confine it within the boundary of traditions that granted some place to the
flesh-a system that had the plea of priority, and was sanctioned by the
habits of those apostles who were nominated by the Lord Himself.
<61442F:130>The assembly indeed, as Paul foresaw, soon returned to its
Judaic ways, when the energy of the apostle was absent. It requires the
power of the Holy Ghost to rise above the religiousness of the flesh. Piety
does not necessarily do this; and power is never a tradition-it is itself,
and thereby independent of men and of their traditions, even when bearing
with them in love. The flesh therefore always returns to the path of
traditions and forms; because it is never power in the things of God,
although it can recognise duty. It does not therefore rise to heaven; it
does not understand grace; it can see what man ought to be for God (without
however perceiving the consequences of this, if God is revealed), but it
cannot see what God in His sovereign grace is for man. It will perhaps
retain it as orthodoxy, where the Spirit has wrought; but it will never
bring the soul into it. This it was, more than the violence of the pagans
or the hatred of the Jews, which wrung the heart and caused the anguish of
the faithful and blessed apostle, who by grace had a character, or rather a
position, more like that of Christ than any other on earth.
These conflicts will be unfolded to us in the Epistles, as well as that
ardent heart which-while embracing in its thoughts all the revealed
counsels of God, and putting each part in its place, and embracing in its
affections the whole of the work and of the assembly of God-could equally
concentrate its whole energy of thought on a single important point, and of
affection on a poor slave whom grace had given to him in his chains. The
vessel of the Spirit, Paul shines with a heavenly light throughout the
whole work of the gospel. He condescends at Jerusalem, thunders in Galatia
when souls were being perverted, leads the apostles to decide for the
liberty of the Gentiles, and uses all liberty himself to be as a Jew to the
Jews, and as without law to those that had no law, as not under law, but
always subject to Christ. Yet how difficult to maintain the height of life
and of spiritual revelation, in the midst of so many opposing tendencies!
He was also "void of offence." Nothing within hindered his communion with
God, whence he drew his strength to be faithful among men. He could say,
and none but he, "Be ye imitators of me, as I am of Christ." Thus also he
could say, "I endure all things for the elect's sake, that they may obtain
the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory," words which
would not be improper in the Lord's mouth-in a more exalted sense
doubtless, because He endured for Paul himself the wrath that would have
been his eternal condemnation-yet words which bring out the remarkable
position of this man of God, as the vessel of the Holy Ghost by whom he was
used. "I fill up," said he, "that which is lacking
of the sufferings of Christ for his body's sake, which is the assembly;
whereof I am made a minister to complete the word of God.
John (through his intimate knowledge of the Person of Christ, born on earth
and Son of God) was able to maintain this essential and individually vital
truth, in the same field in which Paul laboured; but it was Paul's part to
be the active instrument for propagating the truth which saves the soul,
and brings ruined man into connection with God by faith, by communicating
all His counsels of grace.
Still Paul was a man, although a man wonderfully blest. The intrinsic power
of Judaism in connection with its relationship to the flesh is marvellous.
As to the result indeed, if man takes his place below grace, that is, below
God, it is better in a certain sense that he should be man under law than
man without law. He will be the one or the other; but in taking up the
exclusive idea of duty he forgets God as He is-for He is love; and too
often forgets also man as he is-for he is sin. If he unites the idea of
duty and of sin, it is continual bondage, and this is what Christianity in
general is reduced to; with the addition of ordinances to ease the burdened
conscience, of forms to create piety where communion is absent; clothing it
all with the name of Christ, and with the authority of the church, so
named, the very existence of which in its reality is identified with the
principle of sovereign grace, and characterised by subjection.
Chapter 20
But let us return to the history of Paul.
After the uproar has ceased he sends for the disciples, embraces them, and
departs for Macedonia; he visits that whole country, and comes into Greece.
The beginning of the Second Epistle to the Corinthians gives the details of
this part of his history. In Greece he remains three months; and when the
Jews lay wait for him, he goes round by Macedonia, instead of sailing
straight to Syria. At Troas (where a door had been opened to him on his way
into Greece, but where his affection for the Corinthians had not allowed
him to remain) he spends his Sunday, and even the whole week, in order to
see the brethren. We perceive the usual object of their assembly: they
"came together to break bread"; and the ordinary occasion of holding
it-"the first day of the week." Paul avails himself of this to speak to
them all night; but it was an extraordinary occasion. The presence and the
exhortations of an apostle failed in keeping them all awake. It was not
however an assembly held in secret or in the dark. There were many lamps to
light the upper chamber in which they met. By the place in which they came
together we see that the assemblies were not composed of very many persons.
The upper room in Jerusalem received, perhaps, one hundred and twenty. It
appears by different salutations, that they met in private houses-probably
in several, if the number of believers required it; but there was only one
assembly.
Eutychus pays the penalty of his inattention; but God bears testimony to
His own goodness, and to the power with which He had endued the apostle, by
raising him from a state of death. Paul says that his soul was yet in him:
he had only to renew the connection between it and his physical organism.
In other cases the soul had been recalled.
Paul chose to go alone from Troas to Assos. We see all through the history,
that he arranged, by the power that the Spirit gave him over them, the
willing services of his companions-not, doubtless, as their master, yet
more absolutely than if he had been so. He is (under Christ) the centre of
the system in which he labours, the centre of energy. Christ alone can be
by right the centre of salvation and of faith. It was only as filled with
the Spirit of God that Paul was the centre even of that energy; and it was,
as we have seen, by not grieving Him, and by exercising himself to have a
conscience void of offence both towards God and towards men.
Paul does not stop at Ephesus, because in so central a place he must have
stayed some time. It is necessary to avoid that which has a certain moral
claim upon us, if we would not and ought not to be detained by the
obligation it imposes upon us.
It was no want of affection for the beloved Ephesians, nor any thought of
neglecting them. He sends for the elders, and addresses a discourse to
them, which we must examine a little, as setting before us the position of
the assembly at that time, and the work of the gospel among the nations.
The assemblies were consolidated over a pretty large extent of country, and
in divers places at least had taken the form of a regularly ordered
institution. Elders were established and recognised. The apostle could send
for them to come to him. His authority also was acknowledged on their part.
He speaks of his ministry as a past thing-solemn thought! but he takes them
to witness not only that he had preached the truth to them, but a truth
that spoke to their conscience; setting them before God on the one hand,
and on the other presenting to them Him in whom God made Himself known, and
in whom He communicated all the fulness of grace on their behalf-Jesus, the
object of their faith, the Saviour of their souls. He had done this through
trouble and through difficulty, in face of the unprincipled opposition of
the Jews who had rejected the Anointed One, but in accordance with the
grace that rose above all this evil and declared salvation to the Jews, and
going beyond these limits (because it was grace) addressed itself to the
Gentiles, to all men, as sinners and responsible to God. Paul had done
this, not with the pride of a teacher, but with the humility and the
perseverance of love. He desired also to finish his ministry, and to fail
in nothing that Jesus had committed to him. And now he was going to
Jerusalem, feeling bound in spirit to do so, not knowing what would befall
him, but warned by the Holy Ghost that bonds and afflictions awaited him.
With regard to themselves, he knew his ministry was ended, and that he
should see their face no more. Henceforth responsibility would specially
rest upon them.
Thus what the Holy Ghost here sets before us is, that now, when the detail
of his work among the Gentiles to plant the gospel is related as one entire
scene among Jews and Gentiles, he bids adieu to the work; in order to leave
those whom he had gathered together in a new position, and in a certain
sense to themselves.
It is a discourse which marks the cessation of one phase of the
assembly-that of apostolic labours-and the entrance into another-its
responsibility to stand fast now that those labours had ceased, the service
of the elders whom "the Holy Ghost had made overseers," and at the same
time the dangers and difficulties that would attend the cessation of
apostolic labour, and complicate the work of the elders on whom the
responsibility would now more especially devolve.
The first remark that flows from the consideration of this discourse is,
that apostolic succession is entirely denied by it. Owing to the absence of
the apostle various difficulties would arise, and there would be no one in
his place to meet or to prevent these difficulties. Successor therefore he
had none. In the second place the fact appears that, this energy which
bridled the spirit of evil, once away, devouring wolves from without, and
teachers of perverse things from within, would lift up their heads and
attack the simplicity and the happiness of the assembly, which would be
harassed by the efforts of Satan without possessing apostolic energy to
withstand them.
This testimony of Paul's is of the highest importance with regard to the
whole ecclesiastical system. The attention of the elders who are left in
charge is directed elsewhere than to present apostolical care (as having no
longer this resource, or anything that officially replaced it), in order
that the assembly might be kept in peace and sheltered from evil. It was
their part to care for the assembly in these circumstances. In the next
place, that which was principally to be done for the hindrance of evil was
to shepherd the flock, and to watch, whether over themselves or over the
flock, for that purpose. He reminds them how he had himself exhorted them
night and day with tears. Let them therefore watch. He then commends them,
neither to Timothy, nor to a bishop, but-in a way that sets aside all
official resource-to God, and to the word of His grace which was able to
build them up and assure them of the inheritance. This was where he left
the assembly; that which it did afterwards is not my subject here. If John
came later to work in these parts, it was a great favour from God, but it
changed nothing in the position officially. His labours (with the exception
of the warnings to the seven assemblies in the Apocalypse, where judgment
is in question) regarded the individual life, its character, and that which
sustained it.
With deep and touching affection Paul parts from the assembly at Ephesus.
Who filled the gap? At the same time he appealed to their consciences for
the uprightness of his walk. The free labours of the apostle of the Gentiles
were ended. Solemn and affecting thought! He had been the instrument chosen
of God to communicate to the world His counsels respecting the assembly,
and to establish in the midst of the world this precious object of His
affections united to Christ at His right hand. What would become of it down
here?
Chapter 21
After this time the apostle has to give account of himself, and to
accomplish in a striking manner the predictions of the Lord. Brought before
tribunals by the malice of the Jews, given up through their hatred into the
hands of the Gentiles, it was all to turn to a testimony. Kings and rulers
shall hear the gospel, but the love of many will grown cold. This in
general is his position; but there were details personal to himself.
We may remark here a leading feature in this book which has been little
noticed; that is, the development of the enmity of the Jews, bringing on
their final rejection, such as they were. The Acts ends with the last case
presented; the work in the midst of that people is left in oblivion, and
that of Paul occupies the whole scene in the historical narrative given by
the Spirit. The antagonism of the Jews to the manifestation of the
assembly, which took their place and blotted out the distinction between
them and the Gentiles, by bringing in heaven and full sovereign grace in
contrast with law, which while universal in its direction was given to a
distinct people (grace of which the sinner availed himself by faith)-this
antagonism, presenting itself at every step in the career of the apostle,
although he acted with all possible circumspection, is aroused in its full
intensity at Jerusalem, its natural centre, and manifests itself by
violence and by efforts made with the Gentiles for the purpose of cutting
off Paul from the earth. This rendered the apostle's position very serious
with regard to the Gentiles at Jerusalem-a city the more jealous of its
religious importance from having in fact under Roman bondage lost the
reality of it, through its being transformed into a spirit of rebellion
against the authority which crippled it.
After the history of Christianity, viewed as connected with Judaism (in
reference to the promises and their fulfilment in the Messiah), we find
Paul in three different positions. First, condescending, for the purpose of
conciliation, to take account of that which still existed at Jerusalem, and
even addressing the Jews everywhere in their synagogues, as having
administratively the first right to hear the gospel ("To the Jew first and
then to the Greek") for Jesus was the minister of the circumcision for the
truth of God, to fulfil the promises made to the fathers. In this respect
he never failed, and he establishes these principles clearly and
dogmatically in the Epistle to the Romans. We next find him, in all the
liberty of the full truth of grace and of the purposes of God, in his own
especial work from which he condescended in grace. This is recorded in the
Epistle to the Ephesians. In both these cases he acts under the guidance of
the Holy Ghost, fulfilling the Lord's will. Afterwards, in the third place,
we see him in conflict with the hostility of legal Judaism, the emissaries
of which he met continually, and into the very focus of which he at length
threw himself by going to Jerusalem, in that part of his history which we
are now considering. How much was of God-how much was the consequence of
his own steps-is matter for consideration in this narrative. That the hand
of God was in it for the good of the assembly, and in conducting His
beloved servant for his own good in the end, is beyond all doubt. We have
only to search out how far the will and the mind of Paul came in, as means
which God used to bring about the result He intended, whether for the
assembly or for His servant, or for the Jews. These thoughts are of the
deepest interest, and require humble examination of that which God has set
before us to instruct us on this point in the history which the Spirit
Himself has given us of these things.
The first thing which strikes us at the beginning of this history is that
the Holy Ghost tells him not to go to Jerusalem (chap. 21:4). This word
has evident importance. Paul felt himself bound: there was something in his
own mind which impelled him thither, a feeling that forced him in that
direction; but the Spirit, in His positive and outward testimony forbade
his going.
The apostle's intention had been to go to Rome. The apostle of the Gentiles
sent forth to preach the gospel to every creature, there was nothing of
self in this project that was not according to grace (Rom. 1:13-15).
Nevertheless God had not allowed him to go thither. He was obliged to write
his Epistle to them without seeing them. Heaven is the metropolis of
Christianity. Rome and Jerusalem must have no place with Paul, except as to
bearing with the one in affection, and being ready, when he might, to
evangelise the other. Acts 19:21, which is translated "in the spirit,"
only means the spirit of Paul. He purposed, in his own mind, saying, "When
I have been there, I must also see Rome." Afterwards he charge himself with
the offerings of the saints in Achaia and Macedonia. He wished to prove his
affection for the poor of his own people (Gal. 2:10). This was all well. I
do not know if it was a function suited to an apostle. It was an evidently
Jewish feeling, which set peculiar value on the poor of Jerusalem, and so
far on Jerusalem itself. A Jew would rather be poor at Jerusalem than rich
among the Gentiles. Poor Christians were there no doubt from the time of
their conversion, but that was the origin of this system (compare Neh. 11:
2 and Acts 24:17). All this belonged to relationship with Judaism (Rom.
15:25-28). Paul loved the nation to which he belonged after the flesh, and
which had been the people beloved of God and was still His people although
rejected for a time, the remnant having now to enter the kingdom of God
through Christianity. This attachment of Paul to them (which had its right
and deeply affecting side, but which on another side had to do with the
flesh) led him into the centre of Judaism. He was the messenger of the
heavenly glory, which brought out the doctrine of the assembly composed of
Jews and Gentiles, united without distinction in the one body of Christ,
thus blotting out Judaism; but his love for his nation carried him, I
repeat, into the very centre of hostile Judaism-Judaism enraged against
this spiritual equality. His testimony, the Lord had told him, they would
not receive.
Nevertheless the hand of God was doubtless in it. Paul individually found
his level.
As the instrument of God's revelation, he proclaims in all its extent and
all its force the purpose of the sovereign grace of God. The wine is not
adulterated; it flows out as pure as he had received it. And he walked in a
remarkable way at the height of the revelation committed to him. Still Paul
individually is a man; he must be exercised and manifested, and in those
exercises to which God has subjected us. Where the flesh has found its
pleasure, the sphere in which it has gratified itself, it is there that,
when God acts, it finds its sorrow. Yet, if God saw fit to prove His
servant and manifest him to himself, He stood by him, and blessed him even
through the trial itself-turned it into testimony, and refreshed the heart
of His beloved and faithful servant. The manifestation of that in him which
is not according to the Spirit, or to the height of his calling, was in
love for his blessing and for that of the assembly. Blessed is he who can
walk as faithfully and maintain his standing to the same degree through
grace in the path of grace! Nevertheless Christ is the only model. I see no
one who (in another career) so much resembled Him in His public life as
Paul.
The more we search into the apostle's walk the more we shall see this
resemblance. Only that Christ was the model of perfection in obedience; in
His precious servant there was the flesh. Paul would have been the first to
acknowledge that perfection may be ascribed to Jesus only.
I believe then that the hand of God was in this journey of Paul's; that in
His sovereign wisdom He willed that His servant should undertake it, and
also have blessing in it; but that the means employed to lead him into it
according to that sovereign wisdom, was the apostle's human affection for
the people who were his kinsmen after the flesh; and that he was not led
into it by the Holy Ghost acting on the part of Christ in the assembly.
This attachment to his people, this human affection, met with that among
the people which put it in its place. Humanly speaking, it was an amiable
feeling; but it was not the power of the Holy Ghost founded on the death
and resurrection of Christ. Here there was no longer Jew nor Gentile. In
the living Christ it was right. Christ went on in it to the end in order
that He might die; for this purpose He came.
Paul's affection was good in itself, but as a spring of action it did not
come up to the height of the work of the Spirit, who on Christ's part had
sent him afar from Jerusalem to the Gentiles in order to reveal the
assembly as His body united to Him in heaven. Thus the Jews hearkened to
him till it came to that word, and then they cried out and raised the
tumult which caused Paul to be made prisoner.
He suffered for the truth, but where that truth had no access according to
Christ's own testimony: "they will not receive thy testimony concerning
me." It was necessary however that the Jews should manifest their hatred to
the gospel, and give this final proof of their inveterate opposition to the
ways of God in grace.
At the same time, whatever may have been the subsequent labours of the
apostle (if there were any the Holy Ghost does not make mention of them:
Paul sees the Jews in his own house, and receives all who come to him; but)
the page of the Spirit's history closes here. This history is ended. The
apostolic mission to the Gentiles in connection with the founding of the
assembly is concluded. Rome is but the prison of the apostle of the truth,
to whom the truth had been committed. Jerusalem rejects him, Rome imprisons
him and puts him to death as it had done to Jesus, whom the blessed apostle
had to resemble in this also according to his desire in Philippians 3; for
Christ and conformity to Him was his only object. It was given him to find
this conformity in his service, as it was so strongly in his heart and
soul, with the necessary difference between a ministry which was not to
break the bruised reed nor lift up its voice in the street, and one which
in testimony was to bring forth judgment to the Gentiles.
The mission of the twelve to the Gentiles, going out from Jerusalem (Matt.
28), never took place, so far as any record of it by the Holy Ghost goes.
Jerusalem detained them. They did not even go over the cities of Israel.
The ministry of the circumcision was given to Peter, that of the Gentiles
to Paul in connection with the doctrine of the assembly and of a glorious
Christ-a Christ whom he no longer knew after the flesh. Jerusalem, to which
the apostle was drawn by his affection, rejected both him and his mission.
His ministry to the Gentiles, so far as the free effect of the power of the
Spirit, ended likewise. Ecclesiastical history may perhaps tell us more;
nevertheless God has taken care to bury it in profound darkness Nothing
farther is owned by the Spirit. We hear no more of the apostles at
Jerusalem; and Rome, as we have seen, had none, so far as the Holy Ghost
informs us, excepting that the apostle of the Gentiles was a prisoner there
and finally put to death. Man has failed everywhere on earth. The religious
and political centres of the world-centres, according to God, as to the
earth-have rejected the testimony, and put the testifier to death; but the
result has been that Heaven has maintained its rights inviolate and in
their absolute purity. The assembly the true heavenly and eternal
metropolis of glory and of the ways of God-the assembly which had its place
in the counsels of God before the world was-the assembly which answers to
His heart in grace as united to Christ in glory-remains the object of
faith. It is revealed according to the mind of God, and perfectly such as
it is in His mind, until, as the heavenly Jerusalem, it shall be manifested
in glory, in connection with the accomplishment of the ways of God on the
earth, in the re-establishment of Jerusalem as the centre of His earthly
dealings in grace, His throne, His metropolis in the midst even of the
Gentiles, and in the disappearance even of Gentile power, the seat and
centre of which was Rome.
Let us now examine the thoughts of the apostle, and that which took place
historically. Paul wrote from Corinth to Rome, when he had this journey in
view. Christianity had flowed towards that centre of the world, without any
apostle whatsoever having planted it there. Paul follows it. Rome is, as it
were, a part of his apostolic domain which escapes him (Rom. 1:13-15). He
returns to the subject in chapter IS. If he might not come (for God will
not begin with the capital of the world-compare the destruction of Hazor in
Canaan, Joshua 11:11), he will at least write to them on the ground of his
universal apostleship to the Gentiles. Some Christians were already
established there: so God would have it. But they were in some sort, of his
province. Many of them had been personally in connection with him. See the
number and character of the salutations at the end of the epistle, which
have a peculiar stamp, making the Roman Christians in great part the
children of Paul.
In Romans 15:14-29 he develops his apostolic position with respect to the
Romans and others. He desired also to go into Spain when he had seen the
brethren at Rome a little. He wishes to impart spiritual gifts to them, but
to be comforted by their mutual faith, to enjoy a little of their company.
They are in connection with him; but they have their place as Christians at
Rome without his ever having been there. When therefore he had seen them a
little, he would go into Spain. But he was disappointed with regard to
these projects. All that we are told by the Holy Ghost is that he was a
prisoner at Rome. Profound silence as to Spain. Instead of going farther
when he had seen them and imparted gifts, he remains two years a prisoner
at Rome. It is not known whether he was set free or not. Some say yes,
others no; the word says nothing.
It is here, when he had laid open his intentions and the character of his
relationships in the Spirit with Rome, and when a large field opens before
him in the west, that his old affection for his people and for Jerusalem
intervenes-"But now I go unto Jerusalem to carry help to the saints" (Rom.
15:25-28). Why not go to Rome according to the energy of the Spirit, his
work being finished in Greece? (v. 23). God, no doubt, ordained that those
things should happen at Jerusalem, and that Rome and the Romans should have
this sad place with respect to the testimony of a glorified Christ and of
the assembly, which the apostle rendered before the world. But as to Paul,
why put rebellious Jerusalem between his evangelical desire and his work?
The affection was good, and the service good-for a deacon, or a messenger
of the churches: but for Paul, who had the whole west open before his
evangelising thought!
For the moment Jerusalem intercepted his view. Accordingly, as we have
seen, the Holy Ghost warned him on his way. He foresaw himself also the dang
er he was running into (Rom. 15:30-32). He was sure (v. 29) of coming in
the fulness of the blessing of the gospel of Christ; but he was not sure
that he should come with joy. The thing for which he asked their prayers
turned out quite otherwise than he desired. He was delivered, but as a
prisoner. He took courage when he saw the brethren at Appii Forum and the
Three Taverns. There was no journey into Spain either.
All this to me is very solemn. The Lord, full of grace and tenderness, was
with His poor but beloved servant. In the case of such an one as Paul, it
is a most affecting history, and the Lord's ways adorable and perfect in
goodness. The reality of faith is there in full; the ways of grace perfect,
and perfect in tenderness also, in the Lord. He stands by His servant in
the trial in which he finds himself, to encourage and strengthen him. At
the same time, with regard to the desire of going to Jerusalem, he is
warned by the Spirit, and its consequences are set before him; and, not
turning back, he undergoes the needful discipline, which brings his soul
into its place, and a full place of blessing before God. His walk finds its
level as to spiritual power. He feels the power outwardly of that whereof
he had felt the moral power seeking to hinder his ministry; and a chain
upon his flesh answers to the liberty he had allowed it. There was justice
in God's dealings. His servant was too precious for it to be otherwise. At
the same time, as to result and testimony, God ordered everything for His
own glory, and with perfect wisdom as to the future welfare of the
assembly. Jerusalem, as we have seen, rejects the testimony to the
Gentiles, in a word the ways of God in the assembly (compare 1 Thess. 2:
14-16); and Rome becomes the prison of that testimony; while according to
the Lord's promise the testimony is carried before rulers and kings, and
before Caesar himself.
I have said that grace put Paul into the position of Christ given up to the
Gentiles by the hatred of the Jews. It was a great favour. The
difference-besides the infinite love of the Lord who gave Himself up-was
that Jesus was there in His true place before God. He had come to the Jews:
that He should be delivered up was the crowning act of His devotedness and
His service. It was in fact the offering Himself by the eternal Spirit. It
was the sphere of His service as sent of God. Paul re-entered it: the
energy of the Holy Ghost had placed him outside-"Delivering thee," said the
Lord, "from the people and from the Gentiles, to whom I now send thee to
open their eyes," etc. (Acts 26:17). Jesus had taken him out from them
both, to exercise a ministry that united the two in one body in Christ in
heaven who had thus sent him. In his service Paul knew no one after the
flesh; in Christ Jesus there was neither Jew nor Greek.
Let us resume his history. He is warned by the Holy Ghost not to go up
(chap. 21:4). Nevertheless he continues his journey to Caesarea. A prophet
named Agabus comes down from Judea, and announces that Paul shall be bound
and given up to the Gentiles. It might be said that this did not forbid his
going. It is true; yet, coming after the other, it strengthened the warning
already given. When he walked in the liberty of the Spirit, warned of
danger, he fled from it, while braving every peril if the testimony
required it. At Ephesus he allowed himself to be persuaded not to go into
the theatre.
The Holy Ghost does not usually warn of danger. He leads in the path of the
Lord, and if persecution comes, He gives strength to endure it. Here Paul
was continually warned. His friends entreat him not to go up. He will not
be persuaded. They hold their peace, little satisfied, saying, "The will of
the Lord be done." And, I doubt not, it was His will, but for the
accomplishment of purposes that Paul knew not by the intelligence given of
the Holy Ghost. Only he felt pressed in spirit to go, and ready to suffer
all things for the Lord.
Chapter 22
He departs therefore to Jerusalem; and when there, he goes to the house of
James, and all the elders assemble. Paul relates to them the work of God
among the Gentiles. They turn to their Judaism, of which the multitude were
full, and, while rejoicing in the good that was wrought of God by the
Spirit, they wish Paul to shew himself obedient to the law. The believers
in Jerusalem must needs come together on the arrival of Paul, and their
prejudices with regard to the law must be satisfied. Paul has brought
himself into the presence of man's exigencies: to refuse compliance with
them would be to say that their thoughts about him were true; to act
according to their desire was to make a rule, not of the guidance of the
Spirit in all liberty of love, but of the ignorant and prejudiced condition
of these Jewish believers. It is that Paul was there, not according to the
Spirit as an apostle, but according to his attachment to these former
things. One must be above the prejudices of others, and free from their
influence, to be able to condescend to them in love.
Being there, Paul can hardly do other than satisfy their demands. But the
hand of God is in it. This act throws him into the power of his enemies.
Seeking to please the believing Jews, he finds himself in the lion's mouth,
in the hands of the Jews who were adversaries to the gospel. It may be
added that we hear nothing more of the Christians of Jerusalem. They had
done their work. I have no doubt that they accepted the alms of the
Gentiles.
The whole city being moved and the temple shut, the commander of the band
comes to rescue Paul from the Jews who wished to kill him, taking him
however into custody himself, for the Romans were used to these tumults,
and heartily despised this nation beloved of God, but proud and degraded in
their own condition. Nevertheless Paul commands the respect of the captain
of the band by his manner of addressing him, and he permits him to speak to
the people. To the chief captain Paul had spoken in Greek; but, always
ready to win by the attentions of love, and especially when the loved
though rebellious people were in question, he speaks to them in Hebrew;
that is, in their ordinary language called Hebrew. He does not enlarge upon
what the Lord said revealing Himself to him, but he gives them a particular
account of his subsequent interview with Ananias, a faithful Jew and
esteemed of all. He then enters on the point which necessarily
characterised his position and his defence. Christ had appeared to him,
saying, "They will not receive thy testimony at Jerusalem. I will send thee
far hence unto the Gentiles." Blessed be God! it is the truth; but why tell
it to those very persons who, according to his own words, would not receive
his testimony? The only thing which gave authority to such a mission was
the Person of Jesus, and they did not believe in it.
In his testimony to the people the apostle laid stress in vain upon the
Jewish piety of Ananias: genuine as it might be, it was but a broken reed.
Nevertheless it was all, except his own. His discourse had but one
effect-to bring out the violent and incorrigible hatred of this unhappy
nation to every thought of grace in God, and the unbounded pride which
indeed went before the fall that crushed them. The chief captain, seeing
the violence of the people, and not at all understanding what was going on,
with the haughty contempt of a Roman, orders Paul to be bound and scourged
to make him confess what it meant. Now Paul was himself a Roman citizen,
and born such, while the chief captain had purchased that freedom. Paul
quietly makes this fact known, and they who were about to scourge him
withdraw. The chief captain was afraid because he had bound him; but, as
his authority was concerned in it, he leaves him bound. The next day he
looses him and brings him before the council, or Sanhedrim, of the Jews.
The people, not merely their rulers, had rejected grace.
Chapter 23
Paul addresses the council with the gravity and dignity of an upright man
accustomed to walk with God. It is not a testimony borne to them for their
good; but the appeal of a good conscience to their consciences, if they had
any. The immediate answer is an outrage on the part of the judge or chief
of the council. Paul, roused by this procedure, denounces judgment on him
from God; but, warned that he was the high priest (who was not so clothed
as to be recognised), he excuses himself by his ignorance of the fact,
quoting the formal prohibition of the law to speak evil of the ruler of the
people. All this was right and in place with regard to men; but the Holy
Ghost could not say, "I wist not." It is not the activity of the Spirit
performing the work of grace and of testimony. But it is the means of the
final judgment of God upon the people. It is in this character, as regards
the Jews, that Paul appears here. Paul makes a much better appearance than
his judges, who thoroughly disgrace themselves and manifest their dreadful
condition; but he does not appear for God before them. Afterwards he avails
himself of the different parties of which the council were composed to
throw complete disorder into it, by declaring himself to be a Pharisee, the
son of a Pharisee, and called in question for a dogma of that sect. This
was true; but it was below the height of his own word, "that which was gain
I counted loss for Christ's sake." The Jews however fully manifest
themselves. That which Paul said raises a tumult, and the chief captain
takes him from among them. God has all things at His disposal. A nephew of
Paul's, never mentioned elsewhere, hears of an ambush laid for him and
warns him of it. Paul sends him to the chief captain, who expedites the
departure of Paul under a guard to Caesarea. God watched over him, but all
is on the level of human and providential ways. There is not the angel as
in Peter's case, nor the earthquake as at Philippi. We are sensibly on
different ground.
Chapter 24
Paul appears before the governors in succession-the Sanhedrim, Felix,
Festus, Agrippa, and afterwards Caesar. And here, when occasion offers, we
have striking appeals to conscience; when his defence is in question, the
manly and honest declarations of a good conscience, that rose above the
passions and interests that surrounded him. I pass over in silence the
worldly egotism which betrays itself in Lysias and Festus, by their
assumption of all sorts of good qualities and good conduct; the mixture of
awakened conscience and absence of principle in the governors; the desire
to please the Jews for their own importance, or to facilitate their
government of a rebellious people; and the contempt felt by those who were
not as responsible as Lysias for the public tranquillity. The position of
Agrippa and all the details of the history have a remarkable stamp of
truth, and present the various characters in so living a style that we seem
to be in the scenes described. We see the persons moving in it. This
moreover strikingly characterises the writings of Luke.
Other circumstances claim our attention. Festus, in order to please the
Jews, proposed to take Paul to Jerusalem. But Rome was to have its share in
the rejection of the gospel of grace, of the testimony to the assembly; and
Paul appeals to Caesar. Festus must therefore send him thither, although
embarrassed to know what crime he is to charge him with in sending him. Sad
picture of man's injustice! But everything accomplishes the purposes of
God. In the use of the means Paul succeed no better than in his attempt to
satisfy the Jews. It was perhaps to the eye of man his only resource under
the circumstances; but the Holy Ghost is careful to inform us that he might
have been set at liberty if he had not appealed to Caesar.
In Agrippa there was, I believe, more curiosity than conscience, though
there may have been some desire to profit by the occasion to know what the
doctrine was which had so stirred up people's minds, a disposition to
inquire which was more than curiosity. In general his words are taken as if
he was not far from being convinced that Christianity was true: perhaps he
would have been so if his passions had not stood in the way. But it may be
questioned whether this is the force of the Greek, as generally supposed,
and not, rather, 'In a little you are going to make a Christian of me,'
covering his uneasiness at the appeal to his professed Judaism before
Festus, by an affected and slighting remark. And such I believe to be the
case. The notion of an "almost christian" is quite a mistake, though a
man's mind may be under influences which ought to lead him to it, and yet
reject it. He would have been glad for Paul to be set free. He expressed
his conviction that it might have been done if he had not appealed to
Caesar. He gives his opinion to Festus as a wise and reasonable man; but
his words were in reality dictated by his conscience-words that he could
venture to utter when Festus and all the rest were agreed that Paul had
done nothing worthy of death or of bonds.
Chapters 24-25
God would have the innocence of his beloved servant proved in the face of
the world. His discourse tends to this. He goes farther, but his object is
to give account of his conduct. His miraculous conversion is related in
order to justify his subsequent career; but it is so related as to act upon
the conscience of Agrippa, who was acquainted with Jewish things, and
evidently desired to hear something of Christianity, which he suspected to
be the truth. Accordingly he lays hold with eagerness of the opportunity
that presents itself to hear the apostle explain it. But he remains much
where he was. His condition of soul opens however the mouth of Paul, and he
addresses himself directly and particularly to the king; who moreover,
evidently engrossed by the subject, had called on him to speak. To Festus
it was all a rhapsody.
The dignity of Paul's manner before all these governors is perfect. He
addresses himself to the conscience with a forgetfulness of self that
shewed a man in whom communion with God, and the sense of his relationship
with God, carried the mind above all effect of circumstances. He was acting
for God; and, with a perfect deference for the position of those he
addressed, we see that which was morally altogether superior to them. The
more humiliating his circumstances, the more beauty there is in this
superiority. Before the Gentiles he is a missionary from God. He is again
(blessed be God!) in his right place. All that he said to the Jews was
right and deserved; but why was he, who had been delivered from the people,
subjected to their total want of conscience, and their blind passions which
gave no place for testimony? Nevertheless, as we have seen, it was to be so
in order that the Jews might in every way fill up the measure of their
iniquity, and indeed that the blessed apostle might follow the steps of his
Master.
Chapter 26
Paul's address to king Agrippa furnishes us with the most complete picture
of the entire position of the apostle, as he himself looked at it when his
long service and the light of the Holy Ghost illuminated his backward
glance.
He does not speak of the assembly-that was a doctrine for instruction, and
not a part of his history. But everything that related to his personal
history, in connection with his ministry, he gives in detail. He had been a
strict Pharisee; and here he connects the doctrine of Christ with the hopes
of the Jews. He was in bonds "for the hope of the promise made unto the
fathers." No doubt resurrection entered into it. Why should the king think
resurrection impossible, that God was not able to raise the dead? This
brings him to another point. He had verily thought with himself that he
ought to do many things against Jesus of Nazareth, and had carried them out
with all the energy of his character, and with the bigotry of a devout Jew.
His present condition, as a witness among the Gentiles, depended on the
change wrought in him by the revelation of the Lord when he was engaged in
seeking to destroy His name. Near Damascus a light brighter than the sun
struck them all to the earth, and he alone heard the voice of the Righteous
One, so that he knew from His own mouth that it was Jesus, and that He
looked upon those who believed in Him as Himself. He could not resist such
a testimony. But as this was the great grievance to the Jews, he shews that
his own position was formally marked out by the Lord Himself. He was called
to give ocular evidence of the glory which he had seen; that is, of Jesus
in that glory; and of other things also, for the manifestation of which
Jesus would again appear to him. A glorious Christ known (personally) only
in heaven was the subject of the testimony committed to him. For this
purpose He had set Paul apart from the Jews as much as from the Gentiles,
his mission belonging immediately to heaven, having its origin there; and
he was sent formally by the Lord of glory to the Gentiles, to change their
position with respect to God through faith in this glorious Jesus, opening
their eyes, bringing them out of darkness into light, from the power of
Satan to God, and giving them an inheritance among the sanctified. This was
a definite work. The apostle was not disobedient to the heavenly vision,
and he had taught the Gentiles to turn to God, and to act as those who had
done so. For this cause the Jews sought to kill him.
Nothing more simple, more truthful, than this history. It put the case of
Paul and the conduct of the Jews in the clearest light. When called to
order by Festus, who naturally thought it nothing more than irrational
enthusiasm, he appeals with perfect dignity and quick discernment to
Agrippa's knowledge of the facts upon which all this was based: for the
thing had not been done in a corner.
Agrippa was not far from being convinced; but his heart was unchanged. The
wish that Paul expresses brings the matter back to its moral reality. The
meeting is dissolved. The king resumes his kingly place in courtesy and
condescension, and the disciple that of a prisoner; but, whatever might be
the apostle's position, we see in him a heart thoroughly happy and filled
with the Spirit and love of God. Two years of prison had brought him no
depression of heart or faith, but had only set him free from his harassing
connection with the Jews, to give him moments spent with God.
Agrippa, surprised and carried away by Paul's clear and straightforward
narrative,
relieves himself from the pressure of Paul's personal address by saying,
'In a little you are going to make a Christian of me.' Charity might have
said, "Would to God that thou wert!" But there is a spring in the heart of
Paul that does not stop there. "Would to God," says he, "that not only
thou, but all those that hear me, were ... altogether such as I am, except
these bonds!" What happiness and what love (and in God these two things go
together) are expressed in these words! A poor prisoner, aged and rejected,
at the end of his career he is rich in God. Blessed years that he had spent
in prison! He could give himself as a model of happiness; for it filled his
heart. There are conditions of soul which unmistakably declare themselves.
And why should he not be happy? His fatigues ended, his work in a certain
sense finished, he possessed Christ and in Him all things. The glorious
Jesus, who had brought him into the pains and labour of the testimony, was
now his possession and his crown. Such is ever the case. The cross in
service-by virtue of what Christ is-is the enjoyment of all that He is,
when the service is ended; and in some sort is the measure of that
enjoyment. This was the case with Christ Himself, in all its fulness; it is
ours, in our measure, according to the sovereign grace of God. Only Paul's
expression supposes the Holy Ghost acting fully in the heart in order that
it may be free to enjoy, and that the Spirit is not grieved.
A glorious Jesus-a Jesus who loved him, a Jesus who put the seal of His
approbation and love upon his service, a Jesus who would take him to
Himself in glory, and with whom he was one (and that known according to the
abundant power of the Holy Ghost, according to divine righteousness), a
Jesus who revealed the Father, and through whom he had the place of
adoption-was the infinite source of joy to Paul, the glorious object of his
heart and of his faith; and, being known in love, filled his heart with
that love overflowing towards all men. What could he wish them better than
to be as he was except his bonds? How, filled with this love, could he not
wish it, or not be full of this large affection? Jesus was its measure.
Chapter 27
His innocence fully established and acknowledged by his judges, the
purposes of God must still be accomplished. His appeal to Caesar must carry
him to Rome, that he may bear testimony there also. In his position here he
again resembles Jesus. But at the same time, if we compare them, the
servant, blessed as he is, grows dim, and is eclipsed before Christ, so
that we could no longer think of him. Jesus offered Himself up in grace; He
appealed to God only; He answered but to bear testimony to the truth-that
truth was the glory of His Person, His own rights, humbled as He was. His
Person shines out through all the dark clouds of human violence, which
could have had no power over Him had it not been the moment for thus
fulfilling the will of God. For that purpose He yields to power given them
from above. Paul appeals to Caesar. He is a Roman-a human dignity conferred
by man, and available before men; he uses it for himself, God thus
accomplishing His purposes. The one is blessed, and his services; the other
is perfect, the perfect subject of the testimony itself.
Nevertheless, if there is no longer the free service of the Holy Ghost for
Paul, and if he is a prisoner in the hands of the Romans, his soul at least
is filled with the Spirit. Between him and God all is liberty and joy. All
this shall turn to his salvation, that is, to his definitive victory, in
his contest with Satan. How blessed! Through the communications of the
Spirit of Jesus Christ the word of God shall not be bound. Others shall
gain strength and liberty in view of his bonds, even although, in the low
state of the church, some take advantage of them. But Christ will be
preached and magnified, and with that Paul is content. Oh how true this is,
and the perfect joy of the heart, come what may! We are the subjects of
grace (God be praised!), as well as instruments of grace in service. Christ
alone is its object, and God secures His glory-nothing more is needed: this
itself is our portion and our perfect joy.
It will be remarked in this interesting history, that at the moment when
Paul might have been the most troubled, when his course was perhaps the
least evidently according to the power of the Spirit, when he brought
disorder into the council by using arguments which afterwards he hesitates
himself entirely to justify-it is then that the Lord, full of grace,
appears to him to encourage and strengthen him. The Lord, who formerly had
told him at Jerusalem to go away because they would not receive his
testimony, who had sent him warnings not to go thither, but who
accomplished His own purposes of grace in the infirmity and through the
human affections of His servant, by their means even, exercising at the
same time His wholesome discipline in His divine wisdom by these same
means-Jesus appears to him to tell him that, as he had testified of Him at
Jerusalem, so should he bear witness at Rome also. This is the way that the
Lord interprets in grace the whole history, at the moment when His servant
might have felt all that was painful in his position, perhaps have been
overwhelmed by it, remembering that the Spirit had forbidden him to go up;
for, when in trial, a doubt is torment. The faithful and gracious Saviour
intervenes therefore to encourage Paul, and to put His own interpretation
on the position of His poor servant, and to mark the character of His love
for him. If it was necessary to exercise discipline for his good on account
of his condition and to perfect him, Jesus was with him in the discipline.
Nothing more touching than the tenderness, the opportuneness, of this grace.
Moreover, as we have said, it all accomplished the purposes of God with
regard to the Jews, to the Gentiles, to the world. For God can unite in one
dispensation the most various ends.
And now, restored, reanimated by grace, Paul shews himself in his journey
to be master of the position. It is he who counsels, according to the
communication he receives from God, he who encourages, he who acts, in
every way, on God's part, in the midst of the scene around him. The
description, full of life and reality, which Luke his companion, gives of
this voyage, needs no comment. It is admirable as a living picture of the
whole scene. Our concern is to see what Paul was amid the false confidence,
or the distress of the whole company.
Chapter 28
At Melita we find him again exercising his accustomed power among that
barbarous people. One sees that God is with him. Evangelisation does not,
however, appear in the account of his sojourn there, or of his journey.
Landed in Italy, we see him depressed: the love of the brethren encourages
and reanimates him; and he goes on to Rome, where he dwells two years in a
house that he hires, a soldier being with him as a guard. Probably those
who carried him to Rome had been given to understand that it was only a
matter of Jewish jealousy, for all through the journey they treated him
with all possible respect. Besides he was a Roman.
Arrived at Rome, he sends for the Jews; and here, for the last time, their
condition is set before us, and the judgment which had been hanging over
their heads ever since the utterance of the prophecy (which was especially
connected with the house of David and with Judah)-the judgment pronounced
by Esaias, which the Lord Jesus declared should come upon them because of
His rejection, the execution of which was suspended by the long-suffering
of God, until the testimony of the Holy Ghost was also rejected-this
judgment is here brought to mind by Paul at the end of the historical part
of the New Testament. It is their definitive condition solemnly declared by
the minister of sovereign grace, and which should continue until God
interposed in power to give them repentance, and to deliver them, and to
glorify Himself in them by grace.
We have already marked this characteristic of the Acts, which comes out
here in a clear and striking manner-the setting aside of the Jews. That is
to say, they set themselves aside by the rejection of the testimony of God,
of the work of God. They put themselves outside that which God was setting
up. They will not follow Him in His progress of grace. And thus they are
altogether left behind, without God and without present communication with
Him. His word abides for ever, and His mercy; but others take the place of
positive and present relationship with Him. Individuals from among them
enter into another sphere on other grounds; but Israel disappears and is
blotted out for a time from the sight of God.
It is this which is presented in the book of Acts. The patience of God is
exercised towards the Jews themselves in the preaching of the gospel and
the apostolic mission at the beginning. Their hostility develops itself by
degrees and reaches its height in the case of Stephen. Paul is raised up, a
witness of grace towards them as an elect remnant, for he was himself of
Israel; but introducing, in connection with a heavenly Christ, something
entirely new as doctrine-the assembly, the body of Christ in heaven; and
the setting aside of all distinction between Jew and Gentile as sinners,
and in the oneness of that body. This is linked historically with that
which had been established at Jerusalem, in order to maintain unity and the
connection of the promises; but in itself, as a doctrine, it was a thing
hidden in God in all the ages, having been in His purposes of grace before
the world was. The enmity of the Jews to this truth never abated. They used
every means to excite the Gentiles against those who taught the doctrine,
and to prevent the formation of the assembly itself. God, having acted with
perfect patience and grace unto the end, puts the assembly into the place
of the Jews, as His house, and the vessel of His promises on earth, by
making it His habitation by the Spirit. The Jews were set aside (alas!
their spirit soon took possession of the assembly itself); and the
assembly, and the clear and positive doctrine of no difference between Jew
and Gentile (by nature alike the children of wrath), and of their common
and equal privileges as members of one only body, has been fully declared
and made the basis of all relationship between God and every soul possessed
of faith. This is the doctrine of the apostle in the Epistles to the Romans
and Ephesians.
At the same time the gift of eternal life, as promised before the world
was, has been made manifest by being born again
(the commencement of a new existence with a divine character), and
partaking of divine righteousness; these two things being united in our
resurrection with Christ, by which, our sins being forgiven, we are placed
before God as Christ, who is at once our life and our righteousness. This
life manifests itself by conformity to the life of Christ on earth, who
left us an example that we should follow His steps. It is the divine life
manifested in man-in Christ as the object, in us as testimony.
The cross of Christ is the basis, the fundamental centre, of all these
truths,-the relations between God and man as he was, his responsibility;
grace; expiation; the end of life, as to sin, the law, and the world; the
putting away of sin through the death of Christ, and its consequences in
us. Everything is established there, and gives place to the power of life
that was in Christ, who there perfectly glorified God-to that new existence
into which He entered as man into the presence of the Father; by whose
glory, as well as by His own divine power, and by the energy of the Holy
Ghost, He was raised from the dead.
This does not prevent God's resuming His ways in government with the Jews
on earth, when the church is complete and manifested on high; and which He
will do according to His promises and the declarations of prophecy. The
apostle explains this also in the Epistle to the Romans; but it belongs to
the study of that epistle. The ways of God in judgment with regard to the
Gentiles also at the same period will be shewn us in the Apocalypse, as
well as in prophetic passages of the Epistles in connection with the coming
of Christ, and even with His government of the world in general from the
beginning to the end; together with the warnings necessary for the assembly
when the days of deception begin to dawn and to be developed morally in the
ruin of the assembly, viewed as God's witness in the world.
Our apostle, when brought to Rome, declares (upon the manifestation of
unbelief among the Jews, which we have pointed out) that the salvation of
God is sent to the Gentiles; and he dwells two whole years in the house he
had hired, receiving those who came to him (for he had not liberty to go to
them) preaching the kingdom of God and those things which concerned the
Lord Jesus, with all boldness, no man forbidding him. And here the history
is ended of this precious servant of God, beloved and honoured by his
Master, a prisoner in that Rome which, as head of the fourth empire, was to
be the seat of opposition among the Gentiles, as Jerusalem of opposition
among the Jews, to the kingdom and to the glory of Christ. The time for the
full manifestation of that opposition was not yet come; but the minister of
the assembly and of the gospel of glory is a prisoner there. It is thus
that Rome begins its history in connection with the gospel that the apostle
preached. Nevertheless God was with him.
|
 |

|